[ANDERSON, R. D. Jr., 2001. Metaphors of dictatorship and democracy: Change in the Russian political lexicon and the transformation of Russian politics. Slavic Review, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 312-335.10.2307/2697273]Search in Google Scholar
[AZAROV, M., 2010. Ukraine-Finland: European rapprochement. Baltic Rim Economies, no. 5, pp. 173.]Search in Google Scholar
[BECKEN, S., 2014. Oil depletion or a market problem? A framing analysis of peak oil in The Economist news magazine. Energy Research & Social Science, no. 2, pp. 125-134.10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.018]Search in Google Scholar
[BILGIN, M., 2011. Energy security and Russia’s gas strategy: The symbiotic relationship between the state and firms. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, no. 44, pp. 119-127.10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.04.002]Search in Google Scholar
[BLANK, S., 2008. Russia and the Black Sea's frozen conflicts in strategic perspective. Mediterranean Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 23-54.10.1215/10474552-2008-012]Search in Google Scholar
[BLOCKMANS, S. and VAN VOOREN, B., 2012. Revitalizing the European ‘Neighbourhood Economic Community’: The Case for Legally Binding Sectoral Multilateralism. Working papers of Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, no. 91, pp.1-34.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOUDET, H. et al., 2014. “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy, no. 65, pp.57-67.10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017]Search in Google Scholar
[CAMERON, F., 2010. The politics of EU-Russia energy relations. EU-Russia Energy Relations.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGEL collection, Euroconfidential, pp. 25-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[CAMERON, L., et al., 2009. The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 24 no. 2, pp.63-89.10.1080/10926480902830821]Search in Google Scholar
[CARVALHO, A., 2010. Media(ted) discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Climate Change, no. 1, pp.172-179.10.1002/wcc.13]Search in Google Scholar
[CHERP, A. and JEWELL, J., 2011. The three perspectives on energy security: intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 202-212.10.1016/j.cosust.2011.07.001]Search in Google Scholar
[CHILTON, P., 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.10.4324/9780203561218]Search in Google Scholar
[CHUM, H. L. and OVEREND, R., 2001. Biomass and renewable fuels. Fuel Processing Technology, vol.71, no. 1, pp. 187-195.10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00146-1]Search in Google Scholar
[CROFT, W. and CRUSE , D. A., 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864]Search in Google Scholar
[DE CILLIA, R., et al., 1999. The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, vol. 10, no. 2, pp.149-173.10.1177/0957926599010002002]Search in Google Scholar
[FLETCHER, A. L., 2009. Clearing the air: the contribution of frame analysis to understanding climate policy in the United States. Environmental Politics, vol.18, no. 5, pp. 800-816.10.1080/09644010903157123]Search in Google Scholar
[FLØTTUM K., et al., 2014. Representations of the future in English language blogs on climate change. Global Environmental Change, no. 29, pp. 213-222.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[GIBBS, R. W. Jr., 2011. Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 529-562.10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103]Search in Google Scholar
[GLYNOS, J., et al., 2009. Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods.[online] [Accessed 15 January 2015]. Available at http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/796/]Search in Google Scholar
[GOLDMAN, A. Y. , 2010. Geopolitical Struggles: The Case of Russo-Ukrainian Natural Gas Tensions. [online] [Accessed 15 January 2015]. Available at http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/146044]Search in Google Scholar
[HART, C., 2008. Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: toward a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91-106.10.1080/17405900801990058]Search in Google Scholar
[HART, C., 2011. Force-interactive patterns in immigration discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA. Discourse & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 269-286.10.1177/0957926510395440]Search in Google Scholar
[HART, C., 2014. Constructing contexts through grammar: Cognitive models and conceptualization in British newspaper reports of political protests. Discourse in Context: Contemporary Applied Linguistics, no. 3.]Search in Google Scholar
[HÖGSELIUS, P., 2013. Red Gas. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137286154]Search in Google Scholar
[IJZERMAN, H. and KOOLE, S., 2011. From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches-Bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: Comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). Psychological Bulletin, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 355-361.]Search in Google Scholar
[JASPAL, R., et al., 2014. Fracking in the Polish press: Geopolitics and national identity. Energy Policy, no 74, pp. 253-261.10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.007]Search in Google Scholar
[KATZ, M. N., 2005. Exploiting rivalries for prestige and profit: An assessment of Putin's foreign policy approach. Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 25-36.10.1080/10758216.2005.11052199]Search in Google Scholar
[KELSEY, D. and BENNETT, L., 2014. Discipline and resistance on social media: Discourse, power and context in the Paul Chambers ‘Twitter Joke Trial’. Discourse, Context and Media, no.3, pp. 37-45.10.1016/j.dcm.2013.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[KORPPOO, A. and GASSAN-ZADE, O., 2014. Lessons from JI and GIS for post-2012 carbon finance mechanisms in Russia and Ukraine. Climate Policy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 224-241.10.1080/14693062.2014.844529]Search in Google Scholar
[KRZYZANOWSKI, M. and WODAK, R., 2011. Political strategies and language policies: the European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy. Language Policy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115-136.10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5]Search in Google Scholar
[KRATOCHVIL, P., et al., 2011. The EU as a ‘Framing Actor’: Reflections on media debates about EU foreign policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49, no. 2, pp.391-412.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02122.x]Search in Google Scholar
[LAKOFF, G. and JOHNSON, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[LANCOR, R., 2014. Using metaphor theory to examine conceptions of energy in biology, chemistry, and physics. Science & Education, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1245-1267.10.1007/s11191-012-9535-8]Search in Google Scholar
[LANGACKER, R. W., 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2. Descriptive application.10.1075/cilt.75.10lan]Search in Google Scholar
[LILLIESTAM, J. and ELLENBECK, S., 2011. Energy security and renewable electricity trade - Will Desertec make Europe vulnerable to the “energy weapon”?. Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp.3380-3391.10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.035]Search in Google Scholar
[MALEK, M., 2012. Challenges of European Union’s Energy Policy in the Central Asia and Caspian Region. Elektronik Siyaset Bilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 5, pp.1-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[MCGLONE, M. S., 2007. What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language & Communication, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 109-126.10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.016]Search in Google Scholar
[MUSOLFF, A., 2004. Metaphor and political discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230504516]Search in Google Scholar
[MUSOLFF, A., 2006. Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 23-38. CHILTON, P., 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2]Search in Google Scholar
[NERLICH,B., 2010. 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 419-442.10.3197/096327110X531543]Search in Google Scholar
[NICHOL, J. et al., 2006. Russia’s cutoff of natural gas to Ukraine: Context and implications. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.]Search in Google Scholar
[NYGREN, B., 2008. Putin's use of natural gas to reintegrate the CIS region. Problems of Post- Communism, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 3-15.10.2753/PPC1075-8216550401]Search in Google Scholar
[OBYDENKOVA, A. and LIBMAN, A., 2014. Understanding the foreign policy of autocratic actors: ideology or pragmatism? Russia and the Tymoshenko trial as a case study. Contemporary Politics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 347-364.10.1080/13569775.2014.911500]Search in Google Scholar
[PAASI, A., 2001. Europe as a social process and discourse considerations of place, boundaries and identity. European urban and regional studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7-28.10.1177/096977640100800102]Search in Google Scholar
[PIDGEON, N., 2012. Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 85-106.10.1080/14693062.2012.702982]Search in Google Scholar
[PIDGEON, N.F., KASPERSON, R.K. and SLOVIC, P., 2003. The social amplification of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550461]Search in Google Scholar
[PRINCEN, T., 2010. Speaking of sustainability: the potential of metaphor. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 60-65.10.1080/15487733.2010.11908050]Search in Google Scholar
[RALBOVSKY, J., 2011. Renewable energy policy in Ukraine. Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis. [online] [Accessed 15 January 2015]. Available at http://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/299/ ]Search in Google Scholar
[ROGERS-HAYDEN, T., et al., 2011. ‘Energy security’ and ‘climate change’: Constructing UK energy discursive realities. Global Environmental Change, no. 21, pp. 134-142.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[ROMAINE, S., 1996. War and peace in the global greenhouse: metaphors we die by. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 175-194.10.1207/s15327868ms1103_1]Search in Google Scholar
[RUTLAND, P., 2008. Russia as an energy superpower. New Political Economy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 203-210.10.1080/13563460802018547]Search in Google Scholar
[SHAW, C. and NERLICH, B., 2015. Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: A study of international policies, 1992-2012. Ecological Economics, no. 109, pp. 34-40.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.001]Search in Google Scholar
[SHKARLET, S. and PETRAKOV, I., 2013. Environmental taxation evolution in Ukraine: Trends, Challenges and Outlook. The Herald of Chernihiv State Technological University, vol. 4, no. 64, pp. 287-301.]Search in Google Scholar
[SMITH, K. C., 2007. Russian energy pressure fails to unite Europe. CSIS Euro-Focus, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[SMITH STEGEN, K., 2011. Deconstructing the “energy weapon”: Russia's threat to Europe as case study. Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 6505-6513.10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.051]Search in Google Scholar
[STEEN, G., 2008. The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 213-241.10.1080/10926480802426753]Search in Google Scholar
[TARUS, T. and CRANDALL, M., 2012. Is Russia a threat to Estonian energy security? Baltic Journal of Political Science, no. 1, 77-91.10.15388/BJPS.2012.1.433]Search in Google Scholar
[TROMBETTA, M. J., 2008. Environmental security and climate change: analysing the discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 585-602.10.1080/09557570802452920]Search in Google Scholar
[VAN DIJK, T. A., 2002. Political discourse and political cognition. Politics as text and talk: Analytical approaches to political discourse, no.204, pp. 236.10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij]Search in Google Scholar
[WALKER, M., 2007. Russia v. Europe: The energy wars. World Policy Journal, pp. 1-8.10.1162/wopj.2007.24.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[WIGEN, E., 2012. Pipe Dreams or Dream Pipe?: Turkey's Hopes of Becoming an Energy Hub. The Middle East Journal, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 598-612.10.3751/66.4.12]Search in Google Scholar
[WILSON, K. M., 2000. Communicating climate change through the media. Environmental risks and the media, pp. 201-217.]Search in Google Scholar
[WODAK, R., 2011. The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZHERYBOR, D., 2010. Gas price increase for population and factual gas price dividends for traditional industries: What is the future of Ukrainian economy? КИЇВСЬКИЙ ІНСТИТУТ БІЗНЕСУ ТА ТЕХНОЛОГІЙ, vol. 3, no. 13, pp. 6-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[www.kmu.gov.ua ]Search in Google Scholar
[www.tymoshenko.ua ]Search in Google Scholar
[www.ukurier.gov.ua ]Search in Google Scholar
[www.ukrinform.ua ]Search in Google Scholar
[zakon4.rada.gov.ua ]Search in Google Scholar