Spatial distribution of four sympatric owl species in Carpathian montane forests

Baddeley AJ & Turner R 2005: spatstat: An R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of Statistical Software 12(6): 1–42.10.18637/jss.v012.i06 Search in Google Scholar

Baddeley A, Rubak E & Turner R 2015: Spatial point patterns: methodology and applications with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, London10.1201/b19708 Search in Google Scholar

Barbaro L, Blache S, Trochard G, Arlaud C, de Lacoste N & Kayser Y 2016: Hierarchical habitat selection by Eurasian pygmy owls Glaucidium passerinum in old-growth forests of the southern French Prealps. Journal of Ornithology 157: 333–342. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1285-3.10.1007/s10336-015-1285-3 Search in Google Scholar

Baroni D, Korpimäki E, Selonen V & Laaksonen T 2020: Tree cavity abundance and beyond: nesting and food storing sites of the pygmy owl in managed boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 460: 117818. DOI: 10.1016/j foreco.2019.117818. Search in Google Scholar

Biely A, Bezák V, Elečko M, Gross P et al. 2002: Geological structure, 74–77. In: Miklós L et al. (eds), Landscape Atlas of the Slovak Republic. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava & Slovak Environmental Agency, Banská Bystrica Search in Google Scholar

Burgos G & Zuberogoitia I 2018: A telemetry study to discriminate between home range and territory size in tawny owls. Bioacoustics 29: 109–121. DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2018.1555717.10.1080/09524622.2018.1555717 Search in Google Scholar

Connell J 1983: On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. American Naturalist 122 (5): 661–696. DOI: 10.1086/284165.10.1086/284165 Search in Google Scholar

Cornulier T & Bretagnolle V 2006: Assessing the influence of environmental heterogeneity on bird spacing patterns: a case study with two raptors. Ecography 29: 240–250. DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04287.x.10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04287.x Search in Google Scholar

Dhondt AA 2010: Effects of competition on great and blue tit reproduction: intensity and importance in relation to habitat quality. Journal of Animal Ecology 79: 257–265. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01624.x.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01624.x19804539 Search in Google Scholar

Faško P & Šťastný P 2002: Mean annual precipitation totals, 99. In: Miklós L et al. (eds.), Landscape Atlas of the Slovak Republic. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava & Slovak Environmental Agency, Banská Bystrica Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher R & Fortin MJ 2018: Spatial ecology and conservation modeling. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01989-1_4.10.1007/978-3-030-01989-1_4 Search in Google Scholar

Fox J & Weisberg S 2019: An R companion to applied regression. 3^rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Search in Google Scholar

Google 2020. Veľká Fatra. CNES / Airbus, Google, Maxar Technologies. Google Earth Pro 7.3.3.7699. Retrieved June 13, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Hagemeijer EJM & Blair MJ (eds) 1997: The EBCC atlas of european breeding birds. Their distribution and abundance. T & A D Poyser, London. Search in Google Scholar

Hakkarainen H & Korpimaki E 1996: Competitive and predatory interactions among raptors: an observational and experimental study. Ecology 77: 1134–1142.10.2307/2265582 Search in Google Scholar

Hakkarainen HV, Koivunen & Korpimäki E 1997: Reproductive success and parental effort of Tengmalm’s owls: Effects of spatial and temporal variation in habitat quality. Ecoscience 4: 35–42.10.1080/11956860.1997.11682374 Search in Google Scholar

Henrioux PJD, Henrioux WP & Chopard G 2003: Effects of forest structure on the ecology of pygmy owl Glaucidium passerinum in the Swiss Jura Mountains. Vogelwelt 124: 309–312. Search in Google Scholar

Holm SR, Noon BR, Wiens JD & Ripple WJ 2016: Potential trophic cascades triggered by the barred owl range expansion. Wildlife Society Bulletin 40: 615–624. DOI: 10.1002/wsb.714.10.1002/wsb.714 Search in Google Scholar

Hothorn T, Hornik K, van de Wiel M, Winell H & Zeileis A 2017: Package xcoiny 1.2-1. Conditional inference procedures in a permutation test framework. Retrieved January 24, 2018, from http://coin.r-forge.r-project.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Jackman S 2017: pscl: Classes and methods for r developed in the political science computational laboratory. United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. R package version 1.5.2. Retrieved January 24, 2018, from https://github.com/atahk/pscl/. Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins JM, Lesmeister DB, Wiens JD, Kane JT, Kane VR & Verschuyl J 2019: Three-dimensional partitioning of resources by congeneric forest predators with recent sympatry. Scientific Reports 9(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42426-0.10.1038/s41598-019-42426-0646540030988324 Search in Google Scholar

Kajtoch Ł, Mihorski M & Wieczorek P 2015: Habitat displacement effect between two competing owl species in fragmented forests. Population Ecology 57: 517–527. DOI: 10.1007/s10144-015-0497-y.10.1007/s10144-015-0497-y Search in Google Scholar

Kajtoch Ł, Matysek M & Figarski T 2016: Spatio-temporal patterns of owl territories in fragmented forests are affected by a top predator (Ural owl). Annales Zoologici Fennici 53: 165–174.10.5735/086.053.0405 Search in Google Scholar

Kissling ML, Lewis SB, & Pendleton G 2010: Factors influencing the detectability of forest owls in Southeastern Alaska. Condor 112: 539–548. DOI: 10.1525/cond.2010.090217.10.1525/cond.2010.090217 Search in Google Scholar

Kloubec B, Hora J,Šťastný K 2015: Ptáci jižních Čech. Jihočeský kraj, České Budějovice. [In Czech] Search in Google Scholar

Korpimäki E & Hakkarainen H 2012: The boreal owl: Ecology, behaviour and conservation of a forest-dwelling predator. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511844164 Search in Google Scholar

König C & Weick F 2008: Owls of the world. 2^nd ed. Christopher Helm, London. Search in Google Scholar

LGIS 2020: Lesnícky geografický informačný systém [Forestry geographic information system]. NLC, Zvolen. Retrieved January 24, 2020, from http://gisnlcsk.org/lgis/ Search in Google Scholar

Lourenço R, Goytre F, del Mar Delgado M, Thornton M, Rabaça JE & Penteriani V 2013: Tawny owl vocal activity is constrained by predation risk. Journal of Avian Biology 44: 461–468. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2013.00157.x.10.1111/j.1600-048X.2013.00157.x Search in Google Scholar

Lourenço R, Penteriani V, Rabaça JE & Korpimäki E 2014: Lethal interactions among vertebrate top predators: a review of concepts, assumptions and terminology. Biological Review 89: 270–283. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12054.10.1111/brv.1205423980715 Search in Google Scholar

Lundberg A 1980: Why are the Ural owl Strix uralensis and the tawny owl S. aluco parapatric in Scandinavia? Ornis Scandinavica 11: 116–120.10.2307/3675917 Search in Google Scholar

Mangiafico S 2017: Package xrcompaniony 1.10.1. Functions to support extension education program evaluation. Retrieved January 24, 2018, from http://rcompanion.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Marks JS, Cunnings RJ & Mikkola H 1999: Family Strigidae (typical owls), 76–242. In: del Hoyo J, Elliot A & Sargatal J (eds), Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 5, Barn owls to hummingbirds. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Search in Google Scholar

Mennill DJ 2011: Individual distinctiveness in avian localizations and the spatial monitoring of behaviour. Ibis 153: 235–238. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01119.x.10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01119.x Search in Google Scholar

Mikoláš‚ M, Ujházy K, Jasík M, Wiezik M, Gallay I, Polák P, Vysoký J, Čiliak M, Meigs GW, Svoboda M, Trotsiuk V & Keeton WS 2019: Primary forest distribution and representation in a Central European landscape: Results of a large-scale field-based census. Forest Ecology and Management 449: 117466. DOI: 10.1016/j foreco.2019.117466. Search in Google Scholar

Mikkola H 1976: Owls killing and killed by other owls and raptors in Europe. British Birds 69: 144–154. Search in Google Scholar

Mikkola H 1983: Owls of Europe. T. & A. D. Poyser, Calton. Search in Google Scholar

Morosinotto C, Villers A, Thomson, RL, Varjonen R & Korpimäki E 2017: Competitors and predators alter settlement patterns and reproductive success of an intraguild prey. Ecological Monographs 87: 4–20. DOI: 10.1002/ecm.1238.10.1002/ecm.1238 Search in Google Scholar

Newton I 1998: Population limitation in birds. Academic Press, San Diego & London. Search in Google Scholar

Newton I 2007: Population limitation in birds: the last 100 years. British Birds 100(9): 518. Search in Google Scholar

Obuch J 2011: Spatial and temporal diversity of the diet of the tawny owl (Strix aluco). Slovak Raptor Journal 5: 1–120. DOI: 10.2478/v10262-012-0057-8.10.2478/v10262-012-0057-8 Search in Google Scholar

Pačenovský S 1995: K medzidruhovým vzťahom Glaucidium passerinum, Strix uralensis a Strix aluco [On interspecific relationships between Glaucidium passerinum, Strix uralensis a Strix aluco]. Tichodroma 8: 61–73. [In Slovak with English summary] Search in Google Scholar

Pačenovský S 2002a: Kuvičok vrabčí (Glaucidium passerinum) [Eurasian pygmy owl], 364–367. In: Danko Š, Darolová A & Krištín A (eds), Rozšírenie vtákov na Slovensku [Birds distribution in Slovakia]. Veda, Bratislava. [in Slovak with English summary] Search in Google Scholar

PaŠenovský S 2002b: Pôtik kapcavý (Aegolius funereus) [The Tengmalm’s owl], 379–381 In: Danko Š, Darolová A & Krištín A (eds), Rozšírenie vtákov na Slovensku [Birds distribution in Slovakia]. Veda, Bratislava. [in Slovak with English summary] Search in Google Scholar

Peri A 2018a: A comparison of three methods for planning a census of tawny owl (Strix aluco) populations living at high territorial density. Bioacoustics 27: 245–260. DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2017.1326164.10.1080/09524622.2017.1326164 Search in Google Scholar

Peri A 2018b: Censusing a tawny owl (Strix aluco) population living at high density merging two consolidated techniques. Écoscience 25: 249–257. DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2018.1455370.10.1080/11956860.2018.1455370 Search in Google Scholar

Polis GA, Myers CA & Holt RD 1989: The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 297–330.10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001501 Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team 2020: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved January 24, 2020, from https://www.R-project.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Rebollo S, Martínez-Hesterkamp S, García-Salgado G, Pérez-Camacho L, Fernández-Pereira JM & Jenness J 2017: Spatial relationships and mechanisms of coexistence between dominant and subordinate top predators. Journal of Avian Biology 48: 1226–1237. DOI: 10.1111/jav.01337.10.1111/jav.01337 Search in Google Scholar

Salvati L, Manganaro A & Ranazzi L. 2002. Wood quality and the tawny owl Strix aluco in different forest types of central Italy. Ornis Svecica 12: 47–51. Search in Google Scholar

Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA, Benham EC & Soil Survey Staff 2012: Field book for describing and sampling soils. Version 3.0. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. Search in Google Scholar

Sergio F, Marchesi L & Pedrini P 2003: Spatial refugia and the coexistence of a diurnal raptor with its intraguild owl predator. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 232–245. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003. 00693.x. Search in Google Scholar

Sergio F & Hiraldo F 2008: Intraguild predation in raptor assemblages: a review. Ibis 150: 132–145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00786.x.10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00786.x Search in Google Scholar

Sergio F, Marchesi L, Pedrini P & Penteriani V 2007: Coexistence of a generalist owl with its intraguild predator: distance-sensitive or habitat-mediated avoidance? Animal Behaviour 74: 1607–1616. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.022.10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.022 Search in Google Scholar

Solonen T 1994: Factors affecting the structure of Finnish birds of prey communities. Ornis Fennica 71: 156–169 Search in Google Scholar

Ševčík R, Riegert J, Šindelář J & Zárybnická M 2019: Vocal activity of the Central European boreal owl population in relation to varying environmental conditions. Ornis Fennica 96: 1–12. Search in Google Scholar

Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J & Strohmeier K 1985: Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 269–311.10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001413 Search in Google Scholar

Šotnár K, Pačenovský S & Obuch J 2015: On the food of the Eurasian pygmy owl (Glaucidium passerinum) in Slovakia. Raptor Journal 9: 115–126. DOI: 10.1515/srj-2015-0009.10.1515/srj-2015-0009 Search in Google Scholar

Šťastný P, Nieplová E & Melo M 2002: Mean annual air temperature, 98. In: Miklós L et al. (eds), Landscape atlas of the Slovak Republic. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava & Slovak Environmental Agency, Banská Bystrica Search in Google Scholar

Suhonen J, Halonen M, Mappes T & Korpimäki E 2007: Interspecific competition limits larders of pygmy owls Glaucidium passerinum. Journal of Avian Biology 38: 630–634. DOI: 10.1111/j. 2007.0908-8857.03960.x. Search in Google Scholar

Sunde P & Bølstad MS 2004: A telemetry study of the social organization of a tawny owl (Strix aluco) population. Journal of Zoology 263: 65–76. DOI: 10.1017/S0952836904004881.10.1017/S0952836904004881 Search in Google Scholar

Townsend CR, Begon M & Harper JL 2008: Essentials of ecology. 3^rd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford. Search in Google Scholar

Venables WN & Ripley BD 2002: Modern applied statistics with S. 4^th ed. Springer, New York.10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 Search in Google Scholar

Vrezec A & Bertoncelj I 2018: Territory monitoring of tawny owls Strix aluco using playback calls is a reliable population monitoring method. Bird Study 65 (suppl. 1): S52–S62.10.1080/00063657.2018.1522527 Search in Google Scholar

Vrezec A & MiheliŠ T 2013: The Ural owl, Strix uralensis macroura, in Slovenia: an overview of current knowledge on species ecology. Rivista Italiana di Ornitologia 82: 30–37.10.4081/rio.2012.107 Search in Google Scholar

Vrezec A & Tome D 2004a: Habitat selection and patterns of distribution in a hierarchic forest owl guild. Ornis Fennica 81: 109–118. Search in Google Scholar

Vrezec A & Tome D 2004b: Altitudinal segregation between Ural owl Strix uralensis and tawny owl S. aluco: evidence for competitive exclusion in raptorial birds. Bird Study 52: 264–269. DOI: 10.1080/00063650409461362.10.1080/00063650409461362 Search in Google Scholar

Vrh P & Vrezec A 2006: Interspecific territorial vocal activity of the Ural owl (Strix uralensis) towards tawny owl (Strix aluco), sympatric owl competitor: a playback experiment. Razprave Razreda SAZU 47: 99–105. Search in Google Scholar

Wickham H, Chang W & RStudio 2016: Package xggplot2y 2.2.1. create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. Retrieved January 24, 2017, from http://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Zuberogoitia I & Campos LF 1998: Censusing owls in large areas: a comparison between methods. Ardeola 45: 47–53. Search in Google Scholar

Zuberogoitia I & Martínez JA 2000: Methods for surveying tawny owl Strix aluco populations in large areas. Biota 1: 79–88. Search in Google Scholar

Zuberogoitia I, Martinez JA, Zabala J & Martínez JE 2005: Interspecific aggression and nest-site competition in a European owl community. Journal of Raptor Research 39: 156–159. Search in Google Scholar

Zuberogoitia I, Burgos G, González-Oreja JA, Morant J, Martínez JE & Zabala Albizua J 2019: Factors affecting spontaneous vocal activity of tawny owls Strix aluco and implications for surveying large areas. Ibis 161: 495–503. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12684.10.1111/ibi.12684 Search in Google Scholar