[
Anonymous. (1908). Toasts and Maxims. A Book of Humour to Pass the Time. New York: R. F. Fenno & Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arewa, O. and A. Dundes. (1964). Proverbs and the ethnography of speaking folklore. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 70–85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barcelona, A. (2000). The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. In A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective, 1–28. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barcelona, A. (2003). The metaphorical and metonymic understanding of the Trinitarian dogma. International Journal of English Studies, 3(1), 1–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauman, R. and N. McCabe. (1970). Proverbs in an LSD cult. The Journal of American Folklore, 83/329, 318–324.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bierwiaczonek, B. (2013). Metonymy in Language, Thought and Brain. Sheffield: Equinox.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bierwiaczonek, B. (2014). Conceptual blending in the interpretation of proverbs. Linguistica Silesiana, 35, 101–117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradbury, N. M. (2002). Transforming experience into tradition: Two theories of proverb use and Chaucer’s practice. Oral Tradition, 17(2), 261–289.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buljan, G. and T. Gradečak-Erdeljić. (2013). Where cognitive linguistics meets paremiology: a cognitive-contrastive view of selected English and Croatian proverbs. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 63–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costello, K. (2012). Determinants and consequences of dehumanization: An inter-species model of prejudice. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Department of Psychology, Brock University. Ontario, Canada.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costello, K. and G. Hodson. (2014). Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 175–197.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diez, O. (2001–2002). Metaphor, metonymy, and image schemas: An analysis of conceptual interaction patterns. Journal of English Studies, 3, 47–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doyle, Ch. C. and W. Mieder. 2016. The Dictionary of Modern Proverbs: First Supplement. Proverbium 33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doyle, Ch. C. and W. Mieder. (2018). The Dictionary of Modern Proverbs: Second Supplement. Proverbium 35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doyle, Ch. C. and W. Mieder. (2020). The Dictionary of Modern Proverbs: Third Supplement. Proverbium 37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doyle, Ch. C., W. Mieder and Fred R. Shapiro. (2012). Dictionary of Modern Proverbs. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esar, E. (1952). The Humor of Humor. New York: Horizon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esar, E. (1968). 20,000 Quips and Quotes. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., H. L. Colston and M. D. Johnson. (1996a). Proverbs and the metaphorical mind. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11, 207–216.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., H. L. Colston and M. D. Johnson. (1996b). How to study proverb understanding. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11, 233–239.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive linguistics, 1(3), 323–342.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Honeck, R. (1997). A Proverb in Mind: The Cognitive Science of Proverbial Wit and Wisdom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Honeck, R. P., and J. G. Temple. (1994). Proverbs: The extended conceptual base and Great Chain Metaphor theories. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(2), 85–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Honeck, R. and J. Welge. (1997). Creation of proverbial wisdom in the laboratory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(6), 695–629.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hussein, J. W. (2005). The social and ethno-cultural construction of masculinity and femininity in African proverbs. African Study Monographs, 6(2), 59–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kerschen, L. (1998). American Proverbs about Women: A Reference Guide. Westport, Connecticut; London: Greenwood Publishing House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Key, M. R. (1975). Male/Female Language: With a Comprehensive Bibliography. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiełtyka, R. (2020). The role of historical context responsible for the figurative use of common words derived from place-name. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow, 5F(1), 54–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirsanova, M. (2018). Androcentrism of English proverbs and anti-proverbs with gender components. Journal of Language and Education, 4(2), 68–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kochman-Haładyj, B. (2009). English proverbs – A contributive factor to the stereotype of woman. Galicia English Teachings: Old Pitfalls, Changing Attitudes and New Vista, 60–66. Rzeszów: University of Rzeszów Publishing House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kochman-Haładyj, B. and G.A. Kleparski. (2011). On Pejoration of Women Terms in the History of English. Rzeszów: University of Rzeszów Publishing House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kochman-Haładyj, B. (2020). The vexing problem of gender stereotyping in world proverbs. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 17(1), 73–86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kochman-Haładyj, B. (2021). Anglo American and Polish Proverbs. Linguo-Cultural Perspective on Traditional Values. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, Mind and Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Z. (2008). Metaphor and emotion. In Raymond W. Gibbs, The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 380–396. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come from. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Z. (2018). Metaphor in media language and cognition: A perspective from conceptual metaphor theory. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 3(1), 124–141.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krzeszowski, T. P. (1997). Angels and Devils in Hell: Elements of Axiology in Semantics. Warszawa: Energeia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lai, H. L. (2008). Understanding and classifying two-part allegorical sayings: Metonymy, metaphor, and cultural constraints. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 454–474.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. (1980). Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. and M. Turner. (1989). More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. New York, USA: Harper.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lemghari, E. M. (2019). A metonymic-based account of the semiotic status of proverbs: Against the “deproverbialization thesis.” The Linguistics Journal, 13(1), 30–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Litovkina, A. T. (2019). Women Through Anti-Proverbs. Cham, Switzerland: Pal-grave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Litovkina, A. T. and W. Mieder. (2019). Marriage Seen through Proverbs and Anti-proverbs. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Litovkina, A. T. and W. Mieder. (2006). Old Proverbs Never Die, they just Diversify: A Collection of Anti-proverbs. Burlington: The University of Vermont – Veszprem: The Pannonian University of Veszprem.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loomis, C. G. (1949). Traditional American wordplay: The epigram and perverted proverbs. Western Folklore, 8, 348–357.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maalej, Z. (2003). A cognitive-pragmatic perspective on proverbs and its implications for translation. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 10, 135–154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maggio, R. (1991). A Guide to Nondiscriminatory Language. Phoenix: Oryx Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manser, M. H. (2002). The Facts on File Dictionary of Proverbs. New York: In imprint of Infobase Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Masegosa, A. G. (2010). Metaphoric complexes: A Spanish-English contrastive analysis of metaphor and metonymy in interaction. RESLA, 23, 175–193.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mieder, W. (1982). Proverbs in Nazi Germany: The promulgation of anti-semitism and stereotypes through folklore. The Journal of American Folklore, 95(378), 435–464.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mieder, W. (1993). Proverbs are never out of Season: Popular Wisdom in the Modern Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A Handbook. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mieder, W. (2014). Behold the Proverbs of a People. Proverbial Wisdom in Culture, Literature, and Politics. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mieder, W., S. A. Kingsbury, and K. B. Harder. (1992). A Dictionary of American Proverbs. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mieder, W. and T. Litovkina, A. (1999). Twisted Wisdom: Modern Anti-proverbs. Burlington: The University of Vermont.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moreno, A. I. (2005). An analysis of the cognitive dimension of proverbs in English and Spanish: The conceptual power of language reflecting popular believes. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2, 42–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Musolff, A. (2012). Immigrants and parasites: The history of a bio-social metaphor. In M., Messer, R. Schroeder, and R. Wodak (eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 249–258. Vienna, Austria: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Musolff, A. (2017). Language aggression in public debates on immigration. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 5, 175–177.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norrick, N.R. (1981). Semiotic Principles in Semantic Theory. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Panther, K.-U., and L. Thornburg. (1999). The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, 333–357. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrova, R. (2002). Gender aspects of English proverbs. In W. Mieder (ed.) Prover-bium: Yearbook of International Proverb Scholarship 19, 337–348. Burlington: The University of Vermont.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrova, R. (2014). How religious are the modern Anglo-American proverbs: A linguocultural study. New Semiotics: Between Tradition and Innovation. 12th WORLD CONGRESS OF SEMIOTICS. Sofia 2014 New Bulgarian University. IASS Publications & NBU Publishing House. Proceedings of the World Congress of the IASS/AIS, 847–855. IASS Publications & NBU Publishing House. http://www.iass-ais.org/proceedings2014/viewlesson.php?id=81 (December 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prażmo, E. (2019). ‘Leftiesnowflakes’ and other metaphtonymies in the British political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 18(3), 371–392.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prażmo, E. and R. Augustyn. (2020). Parasites, herbivores and dried fish: Dehumanising metaphorical blends in Japanese. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(2), 148–167.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radden, G. and Z. Kövecses. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, 17–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rigato, E. and A. Minelli. (2013). The great chain of being is still here. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(1), 18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rittersbacher, Ch. (2002). Frau und Mann im Sprichwort: Einblicke in die sprichwortliche Weltanschauung Grosbritanniens und Amerikas. Heidelberg: Das Wunderhorn.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáńez, F. J. (1998). On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(3), 259–274.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáńez, F. J. (2001). Metonymy and the grammar. Language and Communication 21(4), 321–357.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáńez, F. J. (2021). Conceptual Metonymy Theory revisited: Some definitional and taxonomic issues. In X. Wen & J. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 204–227. London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáńez, F.J. and O. I. Díez Velasco. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven, R. and R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, 489–532. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., and A. Galera. (2014). Cognitive Modelling: A Linguistic Perspective. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Safian, L. A. (1967). The Book of Updated Proverbs. New York: Abelard-Schuman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanauddin, N. (2015). Proverbs and patriarchy: analysis of linguistic sexism and gender relations among the Pashtuns of Pakistan. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/6243/1/2015SanauddinPhD.pdf (December 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sapir, E. (1973). Selected Writings in Language, Culture and Personality, D. G. Mandelbaum (ed.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schipper, M. (2006). Never Marry a Woman with Big Feet: Women in Proverbs from around the World. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spender, D. (1980). Man Made Language. London, GB: Routledge and Regan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sullivan, K. and E. Sweetser. (2010). Is ‘Generic is Specific’ a metaphor? In P. Fey, V. Tobin and M. Turner (eds.),Meaning, Form and Body, 309–328. Stand-ford: CSLI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szpila, G. (2003). Krótko o przysłowiu. Kraków: Collegium Columbinum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szpila, G. (2005). Metonymic operations in Polish proverbs. Proverbium, 22, 403–414.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szpila, G. (2017). Współczesne przysłowie – rozważania teoretyczne vs. badania ankietowe. Język Polski, 2, 5–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szutkowski, T. (2019). (Anty)przysłowia vel. innowacje przysłowiowe w przestrzeni e-tekstów. Przyczynek do paremiologii w perspektywie tekstologicznej. Studia Rossica Posnaniensia, 44(2), 169–185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Temple, J. and R. Honeck. (1999). Proverb comprehension: the primacy of literal meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistic Research, 28(1), 41–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Phrase Finder. https://www.phrases.org.uk/ (February 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, M. and G. Fauconnier. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Journal of Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(3), 183–203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walter, N. (1999). The New Feminism. London: Virago.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiktionary. https://www.wiktionary.org/ (February 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
Profilo Orcid