[
1. Teramukai S, Okuda Y, Miyazaki S, Kawamori R, Shirayama M, Teramoto T. Dynamic prediction model and risk assessment chart for cardiovascular disease based on on-treatment blood pressure and baseline risk factors. Hypertens Res. 2016 Feb; 39(2):113-8. doi: 10.1038/hr.2015.120. Epub 2015 Nov 26. PubMed PMID: 26606874; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4753397.10.1038/hr.2015.120
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Reiner Z. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with statins in the elderly. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Jul; 16(7):420.10.1007/s11883-014-0420-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Titapiccolo JI, Ferrario M, Barbieri C, Marcelli D, Mari F, Gatti E, et al. Predictive modeling of cardiovascular complications in incident hemodialysis patients. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012; 2012:3943–6.10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346829
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 774–781.10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00341-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 2013; 31: 1925–1938.10.1097/HJH.0b013e328364ca4c
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996; 15: 361–387.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Kononenko, I., Kukar, M., 2007. Machine Learning and Data Mining: Introduction to Principles and Algorithms. Horwood publm10.1533/9780857099440
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Maimon. O., Rokach, L., 2005. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer, Heidelberg.10.1007/b107408
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. De Graaf, M. A., Broersen, A., Ahmed, W., Kitslaar, P. H., Dijkstra, J., Kroft, L. J., Scholte, A. J., 2014. Feasibility of an Automated Quantitative Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Risk Score for Risk Stratification of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. The American Journal of Cardiology, 113(12):1947–1955. doi:10.1016/j.ajcard.2014.03.034.10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Chawla, N., Bowyer, K., Hall, L., Kegelmeyer, W., 2002. SMOTE: Syntheticminority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16:321–35710.1613/jair.953
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Yijing, L., Haixiang, G., Xiao, L., Yanan, L., Jinling, L., 2016. Adapted ensemble classification algorithm based on multiple classifier system and feature selection for classifying multi-class imbalanced data. Knowl.-Based Syst. 94:88-104.10.1016/j.knosys.2015.11.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Robnik-Sikonja, M., Kononenko, I., 1997. An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression. In: Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. 296-304.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Peng, H., Long, F., Ding, C., 2005. Feature Selection Based on Mutual Information: Criteria of Max-Dependency, Max-Relevance, and Min-Redundancy. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 27 (8):1226-12 38.10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Kohavi, R., John, G., 1997. Wrapper for Feature Subset Selection. Artificial Intelligencel. 97 (1-2): 273-324. Doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X.10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. SMARTool EU Horizon 2020 project: Simulation Modeling of coronary ARTery disease: a tool for clinical decision support. Grant agreement ID: 689068, 2016-2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. EVINCI EU FP7 Project: EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging. Grant agreement ID: 222915, 2009-2012
]Search in Google Scholar
