[1. Peters H. Intrauterine gonadal developement. Fertil Steril 1976;27:493-500.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)41829-7]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Holman DJ, Wood JW, Cambell KL. Age dependent decline of female fecundity is caused by early fetal loos. In Female Reproductive Aging. UK: Parthenon Publishing Group 2000; 123-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Vaskivuo TE, Anttonen M, Herva R, Billing H, Dorland M, te Velde ER, Stenback F, Heikinheimo M & Tapanainen JS. Survival of human ovarian follicles from fetal to adult life: apoptosis, apoptosis-related proteins and transcription factor GATA-4. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:3421-9. DOI:10.1210/jcem.86.7.767910.1210/jcem.86.7.7679]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ & Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1342-6.129155710.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137570]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LS, Piccinino LJ. Ferility, family planning and womens health: new data from the 1995. National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 1997; 23: 1-114.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Polani PE & Crolla JA. A test of the production line hypothesis of mammalian oogenesis. Hum Genet 1991;88:64-70.10.1007/BF002049311959927]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Van Blerkom J, Antczak M & Schrader R. The developmental potential of the human oocite is related to the dissolved oxygen content of folikular fluid: association with vascular endothelial growth factor levels and perifollicular blood flow characteristics. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1047-55.10.1093/humrep/12.5.1047]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Volarcik K, Sheean L, Goldfarb J, Woods L, Abdul Karim FW and Hunt P. The meiotic competence of in vitro matured human oocytes is influenced by donor age: evidence that folliculogenesis is compromised in the reproducively aged ovary. Hum Reprod 1998;13:154-60.10.1093/humrep/13.1.154]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Keefe DL, Niven-Fairchild T, PowellS, Buradagunta S. Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid deletions in oocytes and reproductive aging in women. Fertil Steril 1995;64:577-83.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57796-67641914]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Fritz B, Hallermann C, Olert J, Fuchs B, Bruns M, et al. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)-reevaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. Eur J Hum Genet 2001;9:539-47.10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200669]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Chang MY, Chiang CH, Hsieh TT, Soong YK and Hsu KH. Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1998;69:505-10.10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00557-8]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Babcová K, Ulcová-Gallová Z, Rumpík D, Micanová Z, Bibková K. Inhibin A and B levels in serum and follicular fluids of women with various reproductive failures undergoing in vitro fertilization. Ginekol Pol. 2015;86(10):726-30.10.17772/gp/5784426677580]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Goswami D, Conway SG. Premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:391–410. doi 10.1093/humupd/dmi01210.1093/humupd/dmi012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Steiner AZ, Pritchard D, Stanczyk FZ, Kesner JS, Meadows JW, Herring AH, Baird DD. Association Between Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve and Infertility Among Older Women of Reproductive Age. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1367-1376. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14588.10.1001/jama.2017.14588]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Van Rooij IA, Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, te Velde ER. Women older than 40 years of age and those with elevated FSH levels differ in poor response rate and embrio quality in in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril 2003;79:482-8.10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04839-2]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Perez Mayorga M, Gromoll J, Behere HM, Gassner C, Simoni M. Ovarian response to FSH stimulation depends on the FSH receptor genotype. J clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:3365-9. DOI:10.1210/jcem.85.9.678910.1210/jcem.85.9.6789]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Mohiyiddeen L, Newman WG, McBurney H, Mulugeta B, Roberts SA, Nardo LG. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian reserve markers. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(3):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.04010.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.040]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Argento C, Grisendi V, Casarini L, Volpe A, Simoni M. Polymorphisms in gonadotropin and gonadotropin receptor genes as markers of ovarian reserve and response in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(4):970-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2013.01.086.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.086]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Strowitzki, T., Germeyer, A., Popovici, R., and von Wolff, M. The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:617–630. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml03310.1093/humupd/dml033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh TB, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, Haas J. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1301-05. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1190-910.1007/s10815-018-1190-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Baroni E, Ferrero S, Iacobelli M, et all. Implantation in patients over 40 and raising FSH levels-a review. Placenta 2003;24:34-8.10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00179-6]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Levi AJ, Drews MR, Bergh PA et al. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation does not adversely affect endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilisation cycles. Fertil Steril 2001;76:670-4.10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01988-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[23. Jin XY, Zhao LJ, Luo DH, Liu L, Dai YD, Hu XX, Wang YY, Lin X, Hong F, Li TC, Zhang SY. Pinopode score around the time of implantation is predictive of successful implantation following frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(12):2394-2403. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex312.10.1093/humrep/dex31229040606]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[24. Revel A. Defective endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2012;97(5):1028-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.039.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.03922542142]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[25. Perez-Medina, T., Bajo-Arenas, J., Salazar, F., Redondo, T., Sanfrutos, L., Alvarez, P. et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20: 1632–1635. DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh82210.1093/humrep/deh82215760959]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Siristatidis C, Rigos I, Pergialiotis V, Karageorgiou V, Christoforidis N, Daskalakis G, Bettocchi S, Makrigiannakis A. Endometrial injury for patients with endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing medically assisted reproduction: current data and a protocol.Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2018;35(1). doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2018-004010.1515/hmbci-2018-004030144383]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[27. Matsuzaki, S., Canis, M., Darcha, C., Pouly, J.L., and Mage, G. HOXA-10 expression in the mid-secretory endometrium of infertile patients with either endometriosis, uterine fibromas or unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod. 2009;24: 3180–3187. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep30610.1093/humrep/dep30619736237]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Yu, D., Wong, Y.M., Cheong, Y., Xia, E., and Li, T.C. Asherman syndrome–one century later. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:759–779. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.09610.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.09618406834]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[29. Lessey, B.A. Assessment of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:522–529.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.109521880273]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[30. Lessey, B.A., Killam, A.P., Metzger, D.A., Haney, A.F., Greene, G.L., and McCarty, K.S. Jr. Immunohistochemical analysis of human uterine estrogen and progesterone receptors throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67:334–340. DOI:10.1210/jcem-67-2-33410.1210/jcem-67-2-3342455728]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[31. Chen SL, Wu FR, Luo C, Chen X, Shi XY, Zheng HY. et al. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2010;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-30.10.1186/1477-7827-8-30285169720334664]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[32. Gleicher N, Vidali A, and Barad DH. Successful treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium.Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2123. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.143.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.14321324451]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[33. Mansour R, Tawab N, Kamal O, El-Faissal Y, Serour A, Aboulghar M et al. Intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer significantly improves the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1370–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.04410.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.0442204766422047664]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[34. Bagrie E. Ovarian reserve tests for predicting fertility outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: the International Systematic Collaboration of Ovarian Reserve Evaluation protocol for a systematic review of ovarian reserve test accuracy. BJOG 2006; 113(12):1472-80. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01068.x10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01068.x17176280]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[35. Zebitay AG, Cetin O, Verit FF, Keskin S, Sakar MN, Karahuseyinoglu S, Ilhan G, Sahmay S. The role of ovarian reserve markers in prediction of clinical pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(4):492-497. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1049253.10.3109/01443615.2015.10492532842190226492218]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[36. Coccia ME, Rizzello F. Ovarian reserve. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1127:27-30.10.1196/annals.1434.01118443326]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[37. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 12:685–718. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml034.10.1093/humupd/dml03416891297]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[38. La Marca A, Argento C, Sighinolfi G, Grisendi V, Carbone M, D’Ippolito G, Artenisio AC, Stabile G, Volpe A. Possibilities and limits of ovarian reserve testing in ART. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13(3):398-408.10.2174/13892011279936197221657996]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[39. Amsiejiene A, Drasutiene G, Usoniene A, Tutkuviene J, Vilsinskaite S, Barskutyte L. The influence of age, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio and anti-Mullerian hormone level on clinical pregnancy rates in ART. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(sup1):41-43. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1399692.10.1080/09513590.2017.139969229264991]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[40. Hansen KR, Hodnett GM, Knowlton N, Craig LB. Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril 2011;95:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.00610.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.00620522327]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[41. Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R, Griesinger G, Kelsey TW, La Marca A, Lambalk C, Mason H, Nelson SM, Visser JA, Wallace WH, Anderson RA. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20(3): 370-85. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt062.10.1093/humupd/dmt0622443086324430863]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[42. Hiedar Z, Bakhtiyari M, Foroozanfard F, Mirzamoradi M. Age-specific reference values and cut-off points for antimüllerian hormone in infertile women following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF. J Endocrinol Invest. 2018; 41(7):773-780. doi: 10.1007/s40618-017-0802-z.10.1007/s40618-017-0802-z2923504929235049]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[43. Jeppesen JV, Anderson RA, Kelsey TW, Christiansen SL, Kristensen SG, Jayaprakasan K, Raine-Fenning N, Campbell BK, Yding Andersen C. Which follicles make the most anti-Mullerian hormone in humans? Evidence for an abrupt decline in AMH production at the time of follicle selection. Mol Hum Reprod 2013;19:519-527. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat024.2356294410.1093/molehr/gat02423562944]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Robert KK Lee, Frank SY Wu, Ming-Huei Lin, Shyr-Yeu Lin, and Yuh-Ming Hwu. The predictability of serum anti-Müllerian level in IVF/ICSI outcomes for patients of advanced reproductive age. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:115. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-115.10.1186/1477-7827-9-115317545621843363]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[45. Sayadyan A, Totoyan E. OVARIAN RESERVE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF IVF IN WOMEN OF VARIOUS AGE GROUPS. Georgian Med News. 2017;268:67-72.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Tolikas A, Tsakos E, Gerou S, Prapas Y, Loufopoulos A. Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in serum and follicular fluid as predictors of ovarian response in stimulated (IVF and ICSI) cycles. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2011; 14(4): 246-53. doi:10.3109/14647273.2011.608464.2208813010.3109/14647273.2011.60846422088130]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Bentzen JG, Forman JL, Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, Larsen EC, Friis-Hansen L, Johannsen TH, Nyboe Andersen A. Ovarian reserve parameters: a comparison between users and non-users of hormonal contraception. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:612-619. doi: 10.1016/j. rbmo.2012.09.0012306974010.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.00123069740]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Deb S, Campbell BK, Pincott-Allen C, Clewes JS, Cumberpatch G, Raine-Fenning NJ. Quantifying effect of combined oral contraceptive pill on functional ovarian reserve as measured by serum anti-Müllerian hormone and small antral follicle count using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(5): 574-80. doi: 10.1002/uog.10114.10.1002/uog.1011421997961]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[49. Šorak M, Arsenijevic S, Loncar D, Đuric J, Živanovic A. Climen u terapiji perimenopauzalnih simptoma. Zbornik radova i sažetaka predavanja XV Jugoslovenski simpozijum o fertilitetu i sterilitetu 2002: 245-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Broekmans FJ, de Ziegler D, Howles CM, Gougeon A, Trew G, Olivennes F. The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1044-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2009.04.040.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.04019589513]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[51. Usta T, Oral E. Is the measurement of anti-Müllerian hormone essential? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 24(3): 151-7. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283527dcf.10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283527dcf22487725]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[52. Lass A, Skull J, Mcveigh E, Margara R, Winston R. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod 1997;12:294-297.10.1093/humrep/12.2.29490707149070714]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[53. Pavlik EJ, DePriest PD, Gallion HH, Ueland FR, Reedy MB, Kryscio RJ, et al. Ovarian volume related to age. Gynecol Oncol 2000;77:410–12.10.1006/gyno.2000.578310831351]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Steiner AZ, Pritchard D, Stanczyk FZ, Kesner JS, Meadows JW, Herring AH, Baird DD.Association Between Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve and Infertility Among Older Women of Reproductive Age. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1367-1376. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14588.10.1001/jama.2017.14588574425229049585]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Jirge PR. Poor ovarian reserve. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):63-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.183514.10.4103/0974-1208.183514491528827382229]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[56. De Koning CH, Popp-Snijders C, Schoemaker J, Lambalk CB. Elevated FSH concentrations in imminent ovarian failure are associated with higher FSH and LH pulse amplitude and response to GnRH. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1452–6.10.1093/humrep/15.7.1452]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[57. Barroso G, Oehninger S, Monzo A, Kolm P, Gibbons WE, Muasher SJ. High FSH.:LH ratio and low LH levels in basal cycle day 3: impact on follicular development and IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:499–505.10.1023/A:1016601110424]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Fanchin R, De Ziegler D, Olivennes F, Taieb J, Dzik A, Frydman R. Exogenous follicle stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test (EFORT): a simple and reliable screening test for detecting ‘poor responders’ in invitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1607–11.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138760]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Ranieri DM, Quinn F, Makhlouf A, Khadum I, Ghutmi W, Mcgarrigle H, Davies M, Serhal P. Simultaneous evaluation of basal follicle-stimulating hormone and 17 beta-estradiol response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue stimulation: an improved predictor of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 1998;70:227-33.10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00159-9]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Winslow KL, Toner JP, Brzyski RG, Oehninger SC, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist stimulation test—a sensitive predictor of performance in the flare-up in vitro fertilization cycle. Fertil Steril 1991;56:711–17.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54604-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[61. Ravhon A, Aurell R, Lawrie H, Margara R, Winston RM. The significance of delayed suppression using buserelin acetate and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a long protocol in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 2000;73:325–9.10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00521-X]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Bonilla-Musoles F, Castillo JC, Caballero O, Pérez- Panades J, Bonilla F Jr, Dolz M, Osborne N. Predicting ovarian reserve and reproductive outcome using antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) in patients with previous assisted reproduction technique (ART) failure. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(1): 13-8.22675946]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Ciray HN, Ulug U, Tosun S, Erden HF, Bahceci M. Outcome of 1114 ICSI and embryo transfer cycles of women 40 years of age and over. RBM Online 2006:13(4);516-22.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60639-6]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Jansen RP. The effect of female age on the likelihood of a live birth from in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Medical Journal of Australia 2003:179;258-61.10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05190.x]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Combelles CMH, Orasanu B, Ginsburg ES et al. Optimum number of embryos to transfer in women more than 40 years of ageundergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility 2005:84;1637-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.07010.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.07016359957]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[66. Devroey P, Godoy H, Smitz I et al. Female age predicts embryonic implantation after ICSI- a case controlled study. Human Reproduction 1996:11;1324-7.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a0193808671448]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[67. Szamatowicz M, Grochowski D. Fertility and infertility in aging women. Journal of Gynaecological Endocrinology 1998:12;407-13.10.3109/09513599809012843]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P et al. Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2005:10;436-41.1590144910.1016/S1472-6483(10)60818-8]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Alvaro Mercadal B, Rodríguez I, Arroyo G, Martínez F, Barri PN, Coroleu B. Characterization of a suboptimal IVF population and clinical outcome after two IVF cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34(2):125-128. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.136951510.1080/09513590.2017.136951528868939]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar