<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This paper presents an integralist approach to Jaina logic. This is built around an analysis of the pivotal notion of <italic>antarvyāpti</italic> in Jaina logic. It is shown in this connection why <italic>antarvyāpti</italic> needs to be considered the ‘Core Perspective/Problem’ of Jaina logic. Next, it is shown how all the salient features of Jaina logic (as viewed from its language-oriented perspective and the epistemic perspective respectively) stand intimately related to the so-called core perspective. In the remaining sections of the paper topics like relationship of the core perspective i) to various non-standard systems of logic [DL, FL, NMR etc.,], ii) to the four pillars and to the eight MPC’s of Jaina philosophy, iii) to some bluntly unimaginative ways of looking at Jaina logic [e.g., Ducko-Rabbitism], iv) to the scheme of classification of propositions in Jaina logic, v) to the resulting conceptual economies related to methodology, and especially to a unified theory of Hetvābhāsa and, finally, vi) to a re-assessment of Frege-Husserl discord in the light of the significance of Jñānātmakatā vs Vākyātmakatā in Jaina logic, etc., have been discussed.</p>
</abstract>

This paper presents an integralist approach to Jaina logic. This is built around an analysis of the pivotal notion of antarvyāpti in Jaina logic. It is shown in this connection why antarvyāpti needs to be considered the ‘Core Perspective/Problem’ of Jaina logic. Next, it is shown how all the salient features of Jaina logic (as viewed from its language-oriented perspective and the epistemic perspective respectively) stand intimately related to the so-called core perspective. In the remaining sections of the paper topics like relationship of the core perspective i) to various non-standard systems of logic [DL, FL, NMR etc.,], ii) to the four pillars and to the eight MPC’s of Jaina philosophy, iii) to some bluntly unimaginative ways of looking at Jaina logic [e.g., Ducko-Rabbitism], iv) to the scheme of classification of propositions in Jaina logic, v) to the resulting conceptual economies related to methodology, and especially to a unified theory of Hetvābhāsa and, finally, vi) to a re-assessment of Frege-Husserl discord in the light of the significance of Jñānātmakatā vs Vākyātmakatā in Jaina logic, etc., have been discussed.

A Set of Meta-Systemetic Assumptions for Dovetailing Jaina Logic Into Jaina Metaphysics

Studia Humana

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This paper presents an integralist approach to Jaina logic. This is built around an analysis of the pivotal notion of antarvyāpti in Jaina logic. It is shown...

A Set of Meta-Systemetic Assumptions for Dovetailing Jaina Logic Into Jaina Metaphysics

Pubblicato online: 29 mar 2023

Pagine: 101 - 121

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2023-0009

Parole chiave
DKM, Ducko-Rabbitism, epistemic view of logic, fallacious validity, Hetvābhāsa, ontic view of logic, semantic-conceptual linkage, syllogism-ism, synonymy, synthetic,

© 2023 Tushar K. Sarkar, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

A Set of Meta-Systemetic Assumptions for Dovetailing Jaina Logic Into Jaina Metaphysics

Pubblicato online: 29 mar 2023

Pagine: 101 - 121

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2023-0009

Parole chiaveDKM, Ducko-Rabbitism, epistemic view of logic, fallacious validity, Hetvābhāsa, ontic view of logic, semantic-conceptual linkage, syllogism-ism, synonymy, synthetic,

© 2023 Tushar K. Sarkar, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Parole chiave
DKM, Ducko-Rabbitism, epistemic view of logic, fallacious validity, Hetvābhāsa, ontic view of logic, semantic-conceptual linkage, syllogism-ism, synonymy, synthetic,