In engineering practice related to the maintenance and operation of road bridge infrastructure, we often deal with bridge spans that have permanent deflections. These types of defects may result from various causes such as uncontrolled displacements of scaffolding during the construction, rheological phenomena of structural concrete or overloading as a result of oversized vehicles or collisions. Changes in the grade line of a road surface that are caused by superfluous deflections of bridge spans often have a very significant influence on superstructure dynamic behaviour in operating conditions, mainly resulting from the mutual dynamic interaction between a bridge and vehicles. This issue is particularly important in relation to the health of existing, bridges located along motorways and expressways, on which there are many heavy vehicles and high traffic speeds.
Due to the occurrence of significant permanent deformations of the spans of few motorway bridges in Poland, an attempt was made to model and analyse the impact of this phenomenon on the structure performance in operational conditions. For this purpose, a numerical simulation analysis of the mutual dynamic interactions between vehicles and the considered bridge structure, which has defect in the form of excessive deformations, was carried out. Since the influence of many parameters on the dynamic response of the structure–vehicle system is random (e.g. ^{[1, 2, 3, 4]}), the parametric analyses were carried out taking into account the following factors:
– permanent deflections of spans, with a maximum value ranging from 0 to 150 mm,
– vehicle speed from 10 m/s (36 km/h) to 30 m/s (108 km/h) and
– two heavy vehicle suspension systems, each with very different properties.
During the analyses, main attention was paid to the values of the vertical displacements and accelerations of the vibrations of the bridge spans, as well as to the level of the increased dynamic loads induced by heavy vehicles on deformed superstructure.
Both railway bridges and road bridges are particularly susceptible to dynamic effects in individual cases. It is widely known that the dynamic responses of bridges depend on the vehicle type, speed, type and roughness of the pavement, bridge type, etc. In previous years, a lot of attention in the literature had been dedicated to the analysis of the vibrations of the vehicle–bridge structure system, known in the literature as bridge–vehicle interaction problem. The conducted research concerned rail bridge structures (e.g. ^{[4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]}), with particular emphasis on the objects located along the highspeed railway lines (e.g. ^{[10, 11, 12, 13]}) as well as road bridges (e.g. ^{[14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]}).
In the case of studies related to the modelling and analysis of ‘road bridge–road vehicle’ dynamic interaction, four categories of research problems were usually investigated:
– vehicle–bridge dynamic interaction modelling methodology (e.g. ^{[14, 15, 16, 17]}),
– impact of condition of the road surface (e.g. road roughness, threshold irregularities, local surface defects) on the increase in dynamic wheel loads as well as on the overall dynamic response of the structure under live load (e.g. ^{[18, 19, 20]}),
– serviceability or condition assessment of bridge structures (e.g. ^{[21, 22, 23]}) and
– development of bridge weightinmotion systems (e.g. ^{[2425]}).
The purpose of this article is to assess the influence of permanent deflections of bridge spans on its dynamic response occurring during passages of heavy vehicles. According to the authors’ knowledge, the results of analyses related to the effect of permanent deflections of spans resulting in the corresponding deformation of a road surface on the overall dynamic behaviour of the structure under live load have not been published so far. Moreover, this effect is not included in the currently applicable recommendations for the assessment of existing bridge structures (e.g. ^{[26, 27, 28, 29]}; so far, in most of the countries, there are no standards for evaluating existing bridges). It requires an individual, timehistory vibration analysis of the structure subjected to live loads.
The problem under consideration is quite a special case, very interesting from the scientific point of view and at the same time having practical significance for the management of existing road bridge infrastructure.
The considered bridge (Fig. 1) has two separate multispan superstructures, each one located under a single motorway carriageway. The static diagram of the main girders of the bridge is a sevenspan beam scheme, in which the continuity of the structure in support crosssection zones is assured using a thin reinforced concrete slab only (Fig. 2). The spans are designed as composite steel and concrete structures. Each of the spans consists of five steel I girders with a constant height of 2.00 m, which are casted with a 26cmthick reinforced concrete slab. The axial spacing of the girders is 2.50 m, and their theoretical span length is 41.00 m. The transverse slope of the slab along the deck’s width was obtained by varying the height of the slab slants above the plate girders from 5 to 27 cm. The basic dimensions of a single bridge span are shown in Fig. 3.
The composite structure of each span shows excessive permanent deflections of up to 10 cm, which are inconsistent with the design (Fig. 4). They are probably a result of the creep and shrinkage effect of the reinforced concrete slab, as well as of design and construction errors.
The girders are braced laterally with the Xtype trusses located over the supports and every 6 m along the span.
The bridge spans are supported by steel roller bearings, hingedsliding bearings and tangential nonsliding bearings, which are placed on the reinforced concrete pier caps. The abutments of the bridge are openwork structures embedded in the earthen embankments. The abutment’s foundation slabs are placed on bored piles that have a diameter of 1.50 m. The intermediate supports are frame structures. Each support is made of three piers with a diameter of 1.50 m and topped with a reinforced concrete pier cap with dimensions of 1.50 × 1.50 m.
During the inspection of the object, it was found that the spans showed excessive poorly damped vibrations, which were caused by typical traffic on the bridge. The spans’ vibrations were clearly perceptible and visible to the naked eye. The passage of even a single truck generated significant dynamic effects in terms of amplitudes of displacements and accelerations. In the case of the group of vehicles crossing a bridge (one after the other or side by side), a significant increase in vibration amplitudes was observed, which possibly was caused by the effect of synchronisation of vehicle vibrations with the vibrations of the structure.
The time needed to completely dampen the vibrations of the spans is relatively long and amounts to about 10–15 s. The value of the damping ratio ξ (%), which was determined on the basis of vibration measurements during inspection, ranges from 1% to 1.5%. Estimated damping ratio ξ (%) is slightly lower than for typical composite bridge superstructures (usually 1.5%–2.0%, e.g. ^{[14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]}) and results from the simultaneous influence of the following factors: static system properties, features of the bearing system, type of connections of structural elements, etc. The relatively low damping value of the bridge spans is one of the factors influencing the excessive dynamic behaviour of the structure under operational loads.
When a vehicle passes over a bridge span, there exists a mutually coupled dynamic system in which the interaction forces between the vehicle and the bridge are transmitted through the road surface.^{[8]} For many years, one of the most common theoretical approaches to examine the problem concerning bridge–vehicle interaction has been a method using twodimensional models of both bridges and vehicles.^{[1,4,14,18]} The twodimensional system can provide good results (consistent with the results of experimental tests) for investigating the dynamic behaviour of the bridge spans under moving vehicles on uneven deck surface.^{[18]}
For the purpose of carrying out dynamic timehistory vibration analyses using the Finite Element Method (FEM), the bridge superstructure was represented in the form of a (e^{1},p^{2}) class model composed of onedimensional elements located in a twodimensional space. The model represents a single girder in the three consecutive most outer spans of the analysed structure (Figs 5–7). The single girder model should be considered as a virtually separated element from the superstructure, which can undergo vertical vibration only. On the basis of the preliminary analysis, the threespan model happened to be the most representative one and was assumed as a reference structure for further analysis.
The bars in the model (the Navier–Bernoulli beam elements) were deprived of the possibility of rotation around the longitudinal axis along their length to prevent twisting of the elements. The cross sections of the FEM model bars are shown in Fig. 8. They represent the central girder (see Fig. 3), which is located directly under the right traffic lane and which withstands the greatest loads. The material parameters of the steel and reinforced concrete parts of the girders are given in Table 1.
Summary of material parameters of the steel and reinforced concrete parts of the bar elements of the FEM model.
Selfweight (volumetric weights additionally take into account the weight of the span's bracings and the spans’ equipment)  82.6 
 29.6 
 
Young's modulus  210,000.0 
 36000.0 
 
Shear modulus  80,769.0 
 15000.0 
 
Poisson ratio  0.3  (  )  0.2  (  ) 
Dynamic theoretical analyses were conducted with the use of two categories of models of the bridge span structure:
– a model without damage, that is, with ideal span geometry, in accordance with the designed grade line and
– a model with damage in the form of permanent deflections of the bridge spans, which were applied as equivalent geometric imperfections in relation to the original ideal geometry of the FEM model.
In the conducted simulations, permanent deflections with maximum values ranging from 0 to 150 mm were considered (these values correspond to the radius of curvature in the range from 1400 m to infinity). The deformed shape of the model representing permanent deflections was determined using the socalled primary load case (PLC) approach.^{[33]} In the first step of analysis, evenly distributed static load was applied to all spans, which allowed obtaining the desired deformed geometry of the system. Then, in the second step of analysis, dynamic timehistory simulations of moving vehicle were performed according to the methodology described in Section 7, taking into account the deformed geometry of the system.
The applied modelling approach of bridge superstructure allows to achieve the assumed research goals, although it simplifies the vibration of the entire superstructure. In the next stages of research (not presented in this paper), it is also planned to conduct more advanced theoretical analyses using spatial models of structure and vehicle validated by the results of experimental tests.
The analysis of the dynamic behaviour of the bridge structure under the live loads not only requires the adoption of an effective numerical model of the structure, but also an effective mechanical model of a moving vehicle. In the presented simulation analyses, a typical fiveaxle truck with a total weight of 40 t was modelled as the live load (Fig. 9).
The actual suspension system of a truck with a semitrailer (Fig. 9b) is characterised by the use of complex hydraulic and pneumatic systems, which, apart from damping the vibrations and levelling the effects of road unevenness, equalise the pressure on individual axles. In the presented analyses, a simplified suspension model was used, in which the vehicle load was reduced to five masses (M_{1}–M_{2}) supported by viscoelastic oscillators, individually described by stiffness (k_{1}–k_{2}) and damping (c_{1}–c_{2}) parameters (see Fig. 10). These mass oscillators correspond with individual suspension axles and are connected with each other by a bar of considerable stiffness, which has a hinge at the place of mass M_{2}. It should be noted that in these types of models, certain issues, such as contact between the tire and the road surface, cannot be precisely taken into account. However, it is possible to properly select the parameters, so that the entire vehicle model is able to reproduce the specific dynamic characteristics of real vehicles.
The viscous damping ratio ξ (%) of the suspension system in new vehicles is most often in the range of 20%–35%. Values of the viscous damping coefficient in the range from 10% to 40% are also acceptable and do not indicate incorrect damping in the suspension system. A damping coefficient of 10% was assumed for further calculations.
Temporary (dynamic) values of the vertical components of loads from vehicle wheels acting on the surface change significantly while driving.^{[30]} In general, they depend on vehicle speed, vehicle suspension parameters, road surface condition, type of transported cargo or aerodynamic effects. Several dominant components can be distinguished in the frequency spectrum of the signal corresponding to vehicle vertical axle loads:
– components in the range of about 1.0–3.0 Hz related to the basic natural frequencies of the vehicle body vibrations; they result from the vibrations of the socalled sprung mass and
– a component, usually in the range of 8–10 Hz, which is related to the effect of suspension and wheel mass (the socalled unsprung mass) on the road surface.
Comprehensive modelling of the variability of vehicle wheel pressure on the surface of the bridge deck, which at the same time takes into account the interaction of the structure–vehicle systems, requires the adoption of very complex models that represent the dynamic characteristics of the vehicle (e.g. ^{[7, 11, 12, 13]}). In order to simplify the issue, in the presented analyses, two separate vehicles models were used:
– Model A – represents a vehicle with elastic suspension, in which the dominant component of the vehicle wheel loads in the frequency spectrum is equal to 2.3 Hz, and which is consistent with the first group of basic natural frequencies of the bridge spans model (see Table 3); the share of other components was omitted and
– Model B – represents a vehicle with rigid suspension, in which the dominant component of vehicle wheel loads in the frequency spectrum is equal to 7.5 Hz, and which is close to the second group of natural frequencies of the bridge spans model (see Table 3); the share of other components was omitted.
The basic parameters adopted in the developed live load models are presented in Table 2. The values of parameters were adopted based on the specialised technical literature (e.g. ^{[31]}).
Parameters of the numerical models of the considered vehicles.
Basic natural frequencies  2.3 Hz  7.5 Hz 
Number of generalised nodal displacements  5  5 
Concentrated masses in the place of the axles  M_{1}=1.265 t  M_{1}=1.265 t 
M_{2}=2.415 t  M_{2}=2.415 t  
M_{3–5}=1.840 t  M_{3–5}=1.840 t  
Suspension rigidity  k_{1}=263.9 kN/m  k_{1}=2806.0 kN/m 
k_{2}=503.8 kN/m  k_{2}=5357.0 kN/m  
k_{3–5}=383.9 kN/m  k_{3–5}==4082.0 kN/m  
Suspension damping  c_{1}=3.654 kN/(m·s)  c_{1}==11.920 kN/(m·s) 
c_{2}=6.976 kN/(m·s)  c_{2}=22.750 kN/(m·s)  
c_{3–5}=5.315 kN/(m·s)  c_{3–5}=17.330 kN/(m·s) 
The dynamic parameters of the structure model were determined using the
Selected results of linear modal analysis using FEM.
The first group of natural forms of vibrations  



The second group of natural forms of vibrations  



The third group of natural forms of vibrations  



Moreover, a comprehensive dynamic analysis of bridge structures also requires the adoption of a vibration damping model as a function of time. It was assumed that the damping forces are linear, that is, directly proportional to the speed of the generalised nodal displacements of the FEM model, and are directed opposite to the direction of motion. This is called proportional damping and is also known as the equivalent viscous damping model. There are many different variants of equivalent viscous damping models, which are described, among others, in stateoftheart monographs (e.g. ^{[1, 2, 3]}). In this work, the method of direct numerical integration of the system of equations (Newmark’s method) was used, and therefore, the proportional vibration damping model, called the Rayleigh damping model, was adopted in the calculations (e.g. ^{[1, 2, 3]}). In this model, the global damping matrix of structure
Coefficients of proportionality α and β in relation to the global matrix of the structure’s mass
In the calculations, frequencies
The Rayleigh damping model assumes a linear dependence of the damping ratio ξ on the vibration frequency
A comprehensive picture of the theoretical dynamic response of bridge structures to live loads can be obtained using the time analysis of imposed vibrations. The formulation of the equations of motion, even for systems with several degrees of dynamic freedom, is a demanding task. Analytically, solutions can usually only be obtained for very basic problems. In practice, a necessary step in the dynamic analysis of complex systems is the development and analysis of the FEM numerical model.
In the analysis of the dynamic response of bridge structures to moving loads, methods of dynamic implicit analysis are usually used (e.g. ^{[1, 2, 3]}). In these methods, the values determined in step
In implicit integration methods, time is divided into discrete time periods
In the subsequent time steps
The length of integration step
The values of the velocity and the vibration displacements at the end of the time step are calculated from the following formulas based on the values
Solving equations (4) and (5) requires the determination of the arbitrary nature of changes in acceleration
Alternatively, a linear change of acceleration over a time step can be assumed (linear acceleration method). The nature of changes in physical quantities during a single time step, depending on an arbitrarily adopted change in vibration accelerations, is shown in Fig. 11.
In the Newmark method, for the velocity and displacement at the end of the time interval Δ
In the presented analysis, the parameter values that are used in the standard Newmark method were adopted, that is,
A comprehensive parametric analysis of the dynamic interaction of the developed models of a heavy truck and the considered bridge structure with damage in the form of excessive deformation was carried out. In subsequent simulations of the vehicle driving over the bridge, the impact of changing one simulation factor (with the set values of other parameters) on the dynamic response of bridge model was investigated.
A total of 100 simulations were performed. During the analyses, main attention was paid to the values of the vertical displacements and accelerations of vibrations of the bridge spans, which were generated by heavy vehicles in the main girders as a function of the intensity of permanent deflections of the superstructure. The selected results of the calculations simulating passages of a fiveaxle vehicle weighing 40 t are shown in Figs 12–17:
– Figs 12–14 show the changes in the vertical displacements of the cross section located in the middle of span 3 of the structure model (see the numbering of the spans of the model in Fig. 6) and
– Figs 15–17 show changes in the acceleration of vertical vibrations in the middle of span 3 of the structure model.
The changes in the physical quantities are presented as a function of various parameters:
– values of permanent deflections of spans: 0, 50, 100 and 150 mm,
– vehicle suspension stiffness: Model A – elastic suspension, Model B – rigid suspension and
– vehicle speed, during which the dynamic effects in the structure were usually the highest: 23, 26.8 and 30 m/s.
Additionally, the results of the dynamic displacements of the considered cross sections of the spans were compared with the static deflections generated by the same vehicle.
Changes in the calculated values as a function of time are presented in Figs 12–17. In this cross section, the dynamic effects generated in the structure were significantly greater when compared to the values generated in the remaining spans. The presented results include bridge model vibrations induced by the direct impact of the vehicle, as well as free vibrations that result from the vehicle leaving the structure.
It is also worth noting the rumble effect visible in the free vibrations’ response (see Figs 12–17), which is caused by mutual amplification of vibrations of adjacent spans. This effect results from closely spaced modes of the superstructure structural system (see Table 3) and it may be one of the key factors influencing the socalled dynamic sensitivity of the analysed structure.
The extreme values of the calculated physical quantities for all the numerical simulations (for all passages of vehicles) are shown in Figs 18 and 19:
– Fig. 18 shows the maximum values of the deflections of the cross section located in the middle of spans 1–3 (see the numbering of the model spans in Fig. 18).
– Fig. 19 shows the extreme values of the vertical vibration accelerations of the cross section located in the middle of spans 1–3.
The results are presented as a function of the vehicle speed (ranging from 10 to 30 m/s; the ‘speedstep’ was equal to 0.2 m/s) for the structure without permanent deflections (0 mm) and for the intensity of the permanent deflections of 100 mm in each span.
Changes in the dynamic amplification factor (DAF) imposed by the passage of the vehicle as a function of the value of the permanent deflections of the spans are shown in Fig. 20. DAF parameters, which depict increase in the global dynamic effects in the structure, were determined as the ratio of dynamic to static displacements in the cross sections located in the middle of spans 1–3. The results were presented as a function of the value of the permanent deflections of the spans (0–150 mm) with regards to the fixed value of the vehicle speed (equal to 23 m/s) and different stiffnesses of the vehicle suspension (Model A – elastic suspension, Model B – rigid suspension).
Based on the analysis of the results of the numerical simulations, the following conclusions can be drawn:
– The following factors have a significant influence on the dynamic response of a bridge structure in the context of both displacements and vibration accelerations:
– the speed of the vehicle passage through the bridge,
– range of the permanent deflections of the bridge superstructure and
– stiffness of the vehicle suspension (the effect of different suspension damping values was not analysed).
An increase in the values of the abovementioned parameters results in a significant increase in the dynamic effects in the bridge spans.
– The permanent deflections of the spans have the greatest impact on increase in the dynamic effects in the analysed bridge. Permanent deformations of the spans’ grade line change the trajectory of vehicle movement, which causes forced vibrations of the vehicle itself, as well as their interaction with the vibrations of the structure. Finally, they usually result in increased vibrations of the entire vehicle–structure system and increased values of dynamic loads.
– Extreme dynamic effects in the considered structure (with regards to deflections and accelerations of vibrations) were most often obtained in the cross section located in the middle of span 3 during the passage of vehicles at a speed of about 23 m/s. For example, for the permanent deflection of the spans, which is equal to 100 mm:
– the calculated value of the maximum dynamic deflection in span number 3 is 30% greater than the maximum static deflection and
– the value of the maximum vibration acceleration in span number 3 is almost 3 times greater than the maximum vibration acceleration when the same vehicle passes at the same speed, but along a structure with a perfect geometry.
– Based on the results of the analyses, it can be concluded that the speed of the considered type of truck, which is equal to about 23 m/s (82.8 km/h), is the socalled critical speed. In such cases, the amplitudes of physical quantities that arise in the structure of the bridge spans have significant values.
– The increase in the global dynamic effects in the structure, which are generated by vehicle traffic, is approximately directly proportional to the value of the permanent deflections (Fig. 20). This phenomenon is related to the formation of forces (increased values of interactions) caused by the mass inertia of vehicles and the mutual interaction of the vehicle–structure subsystems.
In addition, it should be taken into account that the increased dynamic effects cause increased stresses (the difference between the maximum and minimum values at the structural notch), which are associated with the vibrations of the span’s elements – in particular, the main girders. This can significantly reduce the fatigue life of the structure of the spans.
The proposed procedure of dynamic numerical simulations can also be useful in the analysis of other types of bridge structures with permanent deflections. Further stages of research will involve the validation of the obtained results of the analyses based on the results of monitoring and dynamic experimental tests carried out during normal operation of the considered bridge. Moreover, it is planned to conduct analogous simulation analyses using a comprehensive spatial FEM model, which would take into account all the elements of the bridge’s spans.
Selected results of linear modal analysis using FEM.
The first group of natural forms of vibrations  



The second group of natural forms of vibrations  



The third group of natural forms of vibrations  



Parameters of the numerical models of the considered vehicles.
Basic natural frequencies  2.3 Hz  7.5 Hz 
Number of generalised nodal displacements  5  5 
Concentrated masses in the place of the axles  M_{1}=1.265 t  M_{1}=1.265 t 
M_{2}=2.415 t  M_{2}=2.415 t  
M_{3–5}=1.840 t  M_{3–5}=1.840 t  
Suspension rigidity  k_{1}=263.9 kN/m  k_{1}=2806.0 kN/m 
k_{2}=503.8 kN/m  k_{2}=5357.0 kN/m  
k_{3–5}=383.9 kN/m  k_{3–5}==4082.0 kN/m  
Suspension damping  c_{1}=3.654 kN/(m·s)  c_{1}==11.920 kN/(m·s) 
c_{2}=6.976 kN/(m·s)  c_{2}=22.750 kN/(m·s)  
c_{3–5}=5.315 kN/(m·s)  c_{3–5}=17.330 kN/(m·s) 
Summary of material parameters of the steel and reinforced concrete parts of the bar elements of the FEM model.
Selfweight (volumetric weights additionally take into account the weight of the span's bracings and the spans’ equipment)  82.6 

29.6 


Young's modulus  210,000.0 

36000.0 


Shear modulus  80,769.0 

15000.0 


Poisson ratio  0.3  (  )  0.2  (  ) 
Compressive and Tensile Strength of Nanoclay Stabilised Soil Subjected to Repeated Freeze–Thaw Cycles Vibration monitoring of structures in the light of the Polish and international requirements Stress–dilatancy behaviour of remoulded Fujinomori clay Influence of Soft Soil Samples Quality on the Compressibility and Undrained Shear Strength – Seven Lessons Learned From the Vistula Marshlands An elastoplastic constitutive model for assessing ground settlements induced by deep excavations Estimation of Screw Displacement PileBearing Capacity Based on Drilling Resistances Effect of the Addition of Dispersed Reinforcement on the Resilient Modulus of Slightly Cemented NonCohesive Soil SecondOrder Work Criterion in the Stability Analysis of an Earth Dam Subjected to Seepage