INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Figure 1

Study area topography and location of core drillings.
Study area topography and location of core drillings.

Figure 2

X-ray diffraction of the studied material (Boumagueur site).
X-ray diffraction of the studied material (Boumagueur site).

Figure 3

Oedometric test on slurry with wi ≥ 1.2 LL (Test: OT1) and on Consolidated soil at 100 kPa (Test: OT2).
Oedometric test on slurry with wi ≥ 1.2 LL (Test: OT1) and on Consolidated soil at 100 kPa (Test: OT2).

Figure 4

Oedometric test on undisturbed soil (Test: OT3) and extrapolation of correlation line and oedometric paths.
Oedometric test on undisturbed soil (Test: OT3) and extrapolation of correlation line and oedometric paths.

Figure 5

Pressuremeter test results.
Pressuremeter test results.

Figure 6

Drying-wetting path on the Boumagueur marl in the form of slurry with wi ≥ 1.2 LL (Test D-W1) and consolidated soil at 100 kPa (Test D-W2).
Drying-wetting path on the Boumagueur marl in the form of slurry with wi ≥ 1.2 LL (Test D-W1) and consolidated soil at 100 kPa (Test D-W2).

Figure 7

Comparison between drying-wetting and oedometric paths.
Comparison between drying-wetting and oedometric paths.

Figure 8

Drying-wetting path on the Boumagueur marl in his natural state (undisturbed samples).
Drying-wetting path on the Boumagueur marl in his natural state (undisturbed samples).

Figure 9

Comparison between drying-wetting, oedometric compressibility and Biarez and Favre correlation on undisturbed soil samples of Boumagueur marl.
Comparison between drying-wetting, oedometric compressibility and Biarez and Favre correlation on undisturbed soil samples of Boumagueur marl.

Compressibility parameters of oedometric tests.

TestCcCsCc/CsP0 (kPa)Ps (kPa)DH/H (%)
Correlation0.430.1142000–2500 (*)
OT10.420.113.81
OT20.410.113.77100
OT3Soil 010.300.083.75150120034.5
Soil 020.300.083.7517080029
Soil 030.280.0753.73180100033

Chemical composition of minerals.

SilicaAluminaFerric oxideCalciumMagnesiumPotassiumSodiumSulfurChlorine
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOK2ONa2OSO3Cl
49.00%14.34%5.43%10.87%2.86%1.81%0.52%1.96%0.02%

Variation of the state parameters as a function of suction domain on drying path.

TestSuction domainΔeΔe / (1+e0) (%)ΔSr (%)Δw (%)
D-W1s ≤ sd0.85−34431.5
sd ≤ s ≤ sSL0.24−14.53.59
s ≥ sSL0086.513
D-W2s ≤ sd0.63−27.53.523
sd ≤ s ≤ sSL0.24−14.53.59
s ≥ sSL0086.513

Lithology of the site.

Depth(*)Soil description
0 – 0.5 mTopsoil, surface clayey sands
0.5 – 2.5 mClay + Sandy clay
2.5 – 10 mCompact greenish marl with traces of sand, clay, gypsum and carbonate concretions.

Mineralogical composition of the studied soil.

QuartzCalciteGypsumDolomiteFeldsparMontmorilloniteIlliteKaolinite
19%16.5%0.1%2%2.4%40%5%15%

Comparison of compressibility parameters of drying-wetting and oedometric tests.

TestCc or Id (I)Cs or Iw (II)(I/II)
Correlation0.4360.1104
OT10.4200.1103.81
OT20.4150.1103.77
D-W10.3940.1203.28
D-W20.3940.1203.28

Physical and chemical properties of the studied material.

Physical identification
▪ Particle size
Gravel(%)-
Sand(%)5
Silt(%)35
Clay(% < 2μm)60
(% < 80μm)98
▪ Atterberg limit
Liquid limit LL(%)61.5
Plastic limit PL(%)29.5
Plasticity index PI(%)32
▪ Solid grains density2.65
Chemical identification
▪ Value of methylene blue7.2
▪ Specific surface area(m2/g)150.7
▪ CaCO3 content(%)46
▪ Organic matter content(%)8.5
▪ Clay activity0.53

Variation of the state parameters as a function of suction domain on wetting path.

TestSuction domainΔeΔe / (1+e0) (%)ΔSr (%)Δw (%)
D-W1s ≥ sSL007213
sSL ≤ s ≤ sresat0.1813165
s ≤ sresat0.4528.5718
D-W2s ≥ sSL007213
sSL ≤ s ≤ sresat0.1813165
s ≤ sresat0.4528.5718
eISSN:
2083-831X
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Geosciences, other, Materials Sciences, Composites, Porous Materials, Physics, Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics