[
Amaral, Patrícia. 2010. Entailment, assertion, and textual coherence: The case of almost and barely. Linguistics 48(3). 525–545.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Binnick, Robert. 2006. Aspect and aspectuality. In Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), The handbook of English linguistics, 244–268.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Broekhuis, Hans & Henk J. Verkuyl. 2014. Binary tense and modality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32. 973–1009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, Jung-Hsing. 2003. State eventualities and aspect marker le in Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 1. 97–110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, Siu-pong. 2015. The relationship of syntactic and semantic aspects of postverbal particles and their preverbal counterparts in Hong Kong Cantonese. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Prosepctive aspect. In Bernard Comrie, Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems, 64–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dowty, David R. 1977. Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English “imperfective” progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1). 45–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenberg, Yael & Moria Ronen. 2013. Three approximators which are almost/more or less/be-gadol the same. In Evan Cohen (ed.), Proceedings of IATL 2012, 51–70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 337–355.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Reiser (eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics, 38–74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 639–650. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landman, Fred. 1992. The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1. 1–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Po-Lun. 2013. “Chabuduo” fuci dou chabuduo ma? “Chabuduo”, foudingci ji tiji de xianghu zuoyong [Are all “approximate adverbs” alike? An interaction of approximate adverbs with negators and scale]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 5. 406–420.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Po-Lun. 2023. Proximity, polarity and scalarity: A semantic study of approximative sentence-final particles in Cantonese. Lingua 294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103595 (accessed 15 May 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Portner, Paul. 1998. The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74(4). 760–787.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shen, Li. 2004. Aspect agreement and light verbs in Chinese: A comparison with Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13. 141–179.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, Carlota S. 1999. Activities: States or events? Linguistics and Philosophy 22(5). 479–508.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2006. Yueyu “dakzai, matzai, gamzai” shifou shuyu tong yi ge jiazu? [Do dakzai, matzai, and gamzai in Cantonese belong to the same family?]. Zhongguo Yuwen Yanjiu [Studies in Chinese linguistics] 6. 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2009. The syntax of two approximatives in Cantonese: Discontinuous constructions formed with zai6. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 37(2). 227–256.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2013. Zaitan “le2” de xing, zhi, yan sanyu—Yi Yueyu wei li [Three conceptual domains of the sentence final particle laa in Cantonese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 3. 195–200, 287.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiao, Zhi-Ye & Jia-Xuan Shen. 2009. “Le” de zhi, xing, yan sanyu [Three domains of the sentence-final particle le2 in Mandarin Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 6. 518–528.
]Search in Google Scholar
