[
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Acquisti, A., & Varian, H. R. (2005). Conditioning Prices on Purchase History. Marketing Science, 24(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aguirre, E., Mahr, D., Grewal, D., De Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2015). Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 91(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.09.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aguirre, E., Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., & Wetzels, M. (2016). The personalization-privacy paradox: Implications for new media. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2015-1458
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alonso-Muñoz, S., González-Sánchez, R., González-Mendes, S., & García-Muiña, F. (2025). The role of blockchain-related technologies in transforming the tourism and hospitality industry: An overview and research guidelines. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(13), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2023-1721
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ameen, N., Hosany, S., & Paul, J. (2022). The personalisation-privacy paradox: Consumer interaction with smart technologies and shopping mall loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106976
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Asif, M., & Sarwar, F. (2025). The essential position of trust in the technology acceptance model: A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis in management studies. Journal of Modelling in Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-12-2023-0282
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Awad & Krishnan. (2006). The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to Be Profiled Online for Personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148715
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baek, S. J., & Lee, H. J. (2025). Unravelling the Effects of Privacy Policies on Information Disclosure: Insights from E-Commerce Consumer Behavior. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20010049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bansal, G., Zahedi, F. M., & Gefen, D. (2016). Do context and personality matter? Trust and privacy concerns in disclosing private information online. Information & Management, 53(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Batista, M., Fernandes, A., Ribeiro, L. P., Alturas, B., & Costa, C. P. (2020). Tensions between Privacy and Targeted Advertising: Is the General Data Protection Regulation being violated? 2020 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI49556.2020.9140835
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blau, P. M. (2017). Exchange and Power in Social Life (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015a). Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where. Marketing Science, 34(5), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2015.0930
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015b). The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bleier, A., Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2020). Consumer privacy and the future of data-based innovation and marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(3), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.03.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, B. (2001). Studying the internet experience. Hewlett-Packard Company. https://shiftleft.com/mirrors/www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-49.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canhoto, A. I., Keegan, B. J., & Ryzhikh, M. (2024). Snakes and Ladders: Unpacking the Personalisation-Privacy Paradox in the Context of AI-Enabled Personalisation in the Physical Retail Environment. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(3), 1005–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10369-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Casaca, J. A., & Miguel, L. P. (2024). The Influence of Personalization on Consumer Satisfaction: Trends and Challenges. In A. T. Rosário, R. N. Cruz, & L. B. Moniz (Eds.), Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services (pp. 256–292). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3455-3.ch010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castillo, D., Canhoto, A. I., & Said, E. (2021). The dark side of AI-powered service interactions: Exploring the process of co-destruction from the customer perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 41(13–14), 900–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1787993
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CISCO. (2025). The Privacy Advantage: Building Trust in a Digital World (Cisco 2025 Data Privacy Benchmark Study). https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/doing_business/trust-center/docs/cisco-privacy-benchmark-study-2025.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cloarec, J. (2020). The personalization–privacy paradox in the attention economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cloarec, J., Meyer-Waarden, L., & Munzel, A. (2024). Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization-privacy paradox on social media. Psychology & Marketing, 41(7), 1574–1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Degutis, M., Urbonavičius, S., Hollebeek, L. D., & Anselmsson, J. (2023). Consumers’ willingness to disclose their personal data in e-commerce: A reciprocity-based social exchange perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103385
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Girotto, M., Moro, M. L. S., & Irurita, A. M. A. (2022). Roles and Implications of Marketing Communications in Retail Settings: A Systematic Review. In F. J. Martínez-López, J. C. Gázquez-Abad, & M. Ieva (Eds.), Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing (pp. 173–199). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06581-1_23
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guo, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, Y. (2016). The privacy–personalization paradox in mHealth services acceptance of different age groups. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.11.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gusenbauer, M., & Gauster, S. P. (2025). How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 212, 123833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123833
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hinz, Hann, & Spann. (2011). Price Discrimination in E-Commerce? An Examination of Dynamic Pricing in Name-Your-Own Price Markets. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043490
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoepman, J.-H. (2014). Privacy Design Strategies. In N. Cuppens-Boulahia, F. Cuppens, S. Jajodia, A. Abou El Kalam, & T. Sans (Eds.), ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection (Vol. 428, pp. 446–459). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55415-5_38
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Homans, G., C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jain, A. K., Sahoo, S. R., & Kaubiyal, J. (2021). Online social networks security and privacy: Comprehensive review and analysis. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(5), 2157–2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00409-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jami Pour, M., & Taheri, F. (2019). Personality traits and knowledge sharing behavior in social media: Mediating role of trust and subjective well-being. On the Horizon, 27(2), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-03-2019-0012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jozani, M., Ayaburi, E., Ko, M., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2020). Privacy concerns and benefits of engagement with social media-enabled apps: A privacy calculus perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106260
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kandampully, J., Zhang, T. (Christina), & Bilgihan, A. (2015). Customer loyalty: A review and future directions with a special focus on the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(3), 379–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2014-0151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karwatzki, S., Dytynko, O., Trenz, M., & Veit, D. (2017). Beyond the Personalization–Privacy Paradox: Privacy Valuation, Transparency Features, and Service Personalization. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(2), 369–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1334467
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192–238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krasnova, H., Günther, O., Spiekermann, S., & Koroleva, K. (2009). Privacy concerns and identity in online social networks. Identity in the Information Society, 2(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-009-0019-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lavado-Nalvaiz, N., Lucia-Palacios, L., & Pérez-López, R. (2022). The role of the humanisation of smart home speakers in the personalisation–privacy paradox. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 53, 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101146
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, C. H., & Cranage, D. A. (2011). Personalisation–privacy paradox: The effects of personalisation and privacy assurance on customer responses to travel Web sites. Tourism Management, 32(5), 987–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, J.-M., & Rha, J.-Y. (2016). Personalization–privacy paradox and consumer conflict with the use of location-based mobile commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.056
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, N., & Kwon, O. (2015). A privacy-aware feature selection method for solving the personalization– privacy paradox in mobile wellness healthcare services. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5), 2764–2771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lei, S. S. I., Chan, I. C. C., Tang, J., & Ye, S. (2022). Will tourists take mobile travel advice? Examining the personalization-privacy paradox. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 50, 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.02.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, H., Sarathy, R., & Xu, H. (2010). Understanding Situational Online Information Disclosure as a Privacy Calculus. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2010.11645450
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ma, X., Qin, Y., Chen, Z., & Cho, H. (2021). Perceived ephemerality, privacy calculus, and the privacy settings of an ephemeral social media site. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106928
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, K. D., Kim, J. J., Palmatier, R. W., Steinhoff, L., Stewart, D. W., Walker, B. A., Wang, Y., & Weaven, S. K. (2020). Data Privacy in Retail. Journal of Retailing, 96(4), 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, K. D., & Murphy, P. E. (2017). The role of data privacy in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mouw, S., Tutuarima, F., & Hatala, R. (2023). Misuse of Personal Data for Commercial Purposes on Facebook Social Media as a Digital Crime and Legal Certainty for Users. JETISH: Journal of Education Technology Information Social Sciences and Health, 2(2), 1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.57235/jetish.v2i2.590
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newell, S., & Marabelli, M. (2015). Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of ‘datification.’ The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804772891
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, D., & Hedberg, T. (2013). The Ethics of Marketing to Vulnerable Populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1476-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parasrampuria, A., & Williams, K. (2023). Ethical Considerations and Societal Impact of Personalized Advertising Algorithms. Journal of Student Research, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i4.5910
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pop, N. (2006). A new paradigm in contemporary marketing: Relational marketing. Management & Marketing, 1(3). https://ideas.repec.org//a/eph/journl/v1y2006i3n3.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saura, J. R. (2024). Algorithms in Digital Marketing: Does Smart Personalization Promote a Privacy Paradox? FIIB Business Review, 13(5), 499–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145241276898
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scutt, J., & Quaadgras, T. (2025). Consumer Preferences for Privacy and Personalization, 2025 Global Research Report. Qualtrics XM Institute. https://www.qualtrics.com/m/www.xminstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/XMI_RRDS_ConsumerPreferencePrivacyPersonalization-2025.pdf?ty=mktocd-thank-you
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shao, Z., Zhang, L., Li, X., & Guo, Y. (2019). Antecedents of trust and continuance intention in mobile payment platforms: The moderating effect of gender. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 33, 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.100823
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solomon, M. R. (2018). Consumer Behavior: Buying, having, and being (Twelfth edition, global edition). Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soni, V. (2024). AI and the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: Balancing Customized Marketing with Consumer Data Protection. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 72(9), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V72I9P105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steinhoff, L., Arli, D., Weaven, S., & Kozlenkova, I. V. (2019). Online relationship marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(3), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0621-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stephen, A. T. (2016). The role of digital and social media marketing in consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, Z., Wang, Z., & Xu, Y. (2024). Privacy protection in cross-platform recommender systems: Techniques and challenges. Wireless Networks, 30(8), 6721–6730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03509-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sundar, S. S. (2020). Rise of Machine Agency: A Framework for Studying the Psychology of Human–AI Interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Newscron Ltd., & Tan, C.-H. (2013). Addressing the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Assessment from a Field Experiment on Smartphone Users. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.07
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023, October 31). VOSviewer Manual. Universiteit Leiden & CWTS Meaningful metrics. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.20.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., & Hu, P. J. H. (2016). Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0612
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, R., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Enhancing recommendation acceptance: Resolving the personalization–privacy paradox in recommender systems: A privacy calculus perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 76, 102755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102755
]Search in Google Scholar
[
We Are Social & Meltwater. (2025). Digital 2025 Global Overview Report. We Are Social & Meltwater. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2025/02/digital-2025/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xie, Y., Zhu, K., Zhou, P., & Liang, C. (2023). How does anthropomorphism improve human-AI interaction satisfaction: A dual-path model. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107878
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, H., Luo, X. (Robert), Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2011). The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, H., Teo, H.-H., Tan, B. C. Y., & Agarwal, R. (2009). The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 135–174. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222260305
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang, Z., Li, Y., Sun, J., Hu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Consumer private data collection strategies for AI-enabled products. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 68, 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101460
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeng, F., Ye, Q., Li, J., & Yang, Z. (2021). Does self-disclosure matter? A dynamic two-stage perspective for the personalization-privacy paradox. Journal of Business Research, 124, 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhu, Y.-Q., Kanjanamekanant, K., & Chiu, Y.-T. (2023). Reconciling the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: Exploring Privacy Boundaries in Online Personalized Advertising. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 294–316. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00775
]Search in Google Scholar
