Comparative Analysis of Peatland Emission Factors: Unravelling the Need for Standardized Measurement and Reporting

[1] Worrall F. et al. IUCN UK Peatland Programme’s Commission of Inquiry on Peatlands. Peatlands and Climate Change. Scientific review, 2010. [Online]. [Accessed 15.04.2024]. Available: https://www.iucn-ukpeatlandprogramme.org/sites/default/files/Review%20Peatlands%20and%20Climate%20Change%2C%20June%202011%20Final.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[2] Waddington J., Warner K., Kennedy G. Cutover peatlands: A persistent source of atmospheric CO2. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2002:16:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001398 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Lappalainen E. Environmental and ecological aspects of peat cutting and removal. Coal, oil shale, natural bitumen, heavy oil and peat. Oxford, United Kingdom: Eolss Publishers Co. Ltd, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Barthelmes A., Couwenberg J., Risager M., Tegetmeyer C., and Joosten H. Peatlands and Climate in a Ramsar context A Nordic-Baltic Perspective. Denmark, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Berglund Ö., Kätterer T., Meurer K. H. E. Emissions of CO2, N2O and CH4 From Cultivated and Set Aside Drained Peatland in Central Sweden. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2021:9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.630721 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bumbiere K., Gancone A., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Carbon balance of biogas production from maize in Latvian conditions. Agronomy Research 2021:19:687–697. https://doi.org/10.15159/ar.21.085 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Terjanika V., Zarins E., Balode L., Pubule J. Legal Framework Analysis for CO Utilisation in Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26:917–929. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0069 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Gancone A., Viznere R., Kaleja D., Pubule J., and Blumberga D. Towards Climate Neutrality via Sustainable Agriculture in Soil Management. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26:535–547. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0041 Search in Google Scholar

[9] European Commission. EUR-Lex Access to European Union Law. Proposal 2022/0195 (COD) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2022 for a regulation on nature restoration. Brussels, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Story Map Series [Online]. [Accessed: 08.11.2023]. Available: https://ozols.gov.lv/optimizacijas.modelis/ Search in Google Scholar

[11] 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories IPCC-TFI [Online]. [Accessed: 13.12.2023]. Available: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ Search in Google Scholar

[12] Jinming H. and Xuehui M. Peat and peatlands. Coal, oil shale, natural bitumen, heavy oil and peat. Oxford, United Kingdom: Eolss Publishers Co. Ltd., 2009. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Lourenco M., Fitchett J. M., and Woodborne S. Peat definitions: A critical review. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 2023:47(4):506–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333221118353 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Talib F. B., et al. Determination of In-Situ Density and Physical Properties with Microstructure of Klias Peat Soil. Transactions on Science and Technology 2022:8:466–475. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rydin H. and Jeglum J. K. The Biology of Peatlands. (1st ed.) Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528722.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Okruszko H. Transformation of fen-peat soils under the impact of draining. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 1993:406:3–73. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Types of peatlands, International Peatland Society. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.11.2023]. Available: https://peatlands.org/peatlands/types-of-peatlands/ Search in Google Scholar

[18] Xuehui M., Jinming H. Classification of peat and peatland. Coal, oil shale, natural bitumen, heavy oil and peat. Oxford, United Kingdom: Eolss Publishers Co. Ltd., 2009. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Davies C. E., Moss D., Hill M. O. EUNIS habitat classification revised 2004. European Environment Agency, European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[20] What is the Difference between a Marsh, Swamp, Bog and Fen? [Online]. [Accessed: 14.12.2023]. Available: https://www.ponderweasel.com/the-difference-between-a-marsh-swamp-bog-and-fen/ Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kellner E. Wetlands-different types, their properties and functions. Technical Report TR-04-08. Sweden, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Yu Z., Loisel J., Brosseau D. P., Beilman D. W., Hunt S. J. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Geophysical Research Letters 2010:37(13). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043584 Search in Google Scholar

[23] UNFCCC. Latvia. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627722 Search in Google Scholar

[24] UNFCCC. Lithuania. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627650 Search in Google Scholar

[25] UNFCCC. Estonia. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627752 Search in Google Scholar

[26] UNFCCC. Russian Federation. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/631716 Search in Google Scholar

[27] UNFCCC. Sweden. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627666 Search in Google Scholar

[28] UNFCCC. Finland. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627719 Search in Google Scholar

[29] UNFCCC. Germany. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627938 Search in Google Scholar

[30] UNFCCC. Ireland. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627813 Search in Google Scholar

[31] UNFCCC. United Kingdom. 2023. Convention. Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627795 Search in Google Scholar

[32] United Nations Climate Change. European Union. 2023 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table. | UNFCCC [Online]. [Accessed: 06.11.2023]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/627830 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Hiraishi T. et al. Chapter 7 – Methodological Choice and Recalculation. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES). Japan, 2003 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Herold A., Monni S., Lin E., Meyer C. P. M., Flugsrud K. Chapter 4. Methodological Choice and Identification of Key Categories. Geneva: Switzerland, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Skrebele A. et al. Latvia’s National Inventory Report Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Latvia from 1990 to 2021 in Common Reporting Format (CRF). Latvia: Riga, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Lazdiņš A., Lupiķis A. LIFE REStore projekta pienesums Latvijas siltumnīcefekta gāzu emisiju uzskaitē. Kūdras ieguves ietekmētu teritoriju atbildīga apsaimniekošana un ilgtspējīga izmantošana (Contribution of the LIFE REStore project to the accounting of greenhouse gas emissions in Latvia. Responsible management and sustainable use of areas affected by peat extraction). Rīga: Baltijas krasti, 2019. (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[37] Carlén E. et al. National Inventory Report Sweden 2023 Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories 1990–2021. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Carlén E. et al. National Inventory Report Sweden 2023: Annexes. Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories 1990–2021. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Forsell P. et al. Finland’s National Inventory Report 2023. Finland, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Gunther D., Gniffke P. National Inventory Report for the German Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2021. Germany, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Drösle M. et al. Chapter 2: Drained Inland Organic Soils. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands. Switzerland, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[42] EUNIS. Factsheet for Blanket bogs [Online]. [Accessed 03.11.2023]. Available: https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats/263 Search in Google Scholar

[43] EUNIS. Factsheet for Raised bogs [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2023]. Available: https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats/260 Search in Google Scholar

[44] Davis R. B., Anderson D. S. TB146: The Eccentric Bogs of Maine: A Rare Wetland Type in the United States. Maine: Maine agricultural experiment station, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Lindsay R. Peatland (Mire Types): Based on Origin and Behavior of Water, Peat Genesis, Landscape Position, and Climate. Wetland Book. Springer Dordrecht, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4001-3_279 Search in Google Scholar

[46] EUNIS. Factsheet for Transition mires and quaking bogs. [Online]. [Accessed 21.12.2023]. Available: https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats/10145 Search in Google Scholar

[47] EUNIS. Factsheet for Aapa mires. [Online]. [Accessed 18.12.2023]. Available: https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats/10154 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Evans D., Roekaerts M. Interpretation manual of the habitats listed in Resolution No. 4 (1996) listing endangered natural habitats requiring specific conservation measures. Strasbourg, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[49] EUNIS. Factsheet for Palsa mires. [Online]. [Accessed 18.12.2023]. Available: https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats/10155 Search in Google Scholar

[50] Laitinen J., Oksanen J., Kaakinen E., Peterka T., Moen A., Tahvanainen T. Gradients, Species Richness and Communities in Eastern Finnish Sloping Fens. Annales Botanici Fennici 2021:58:289–312. https://doi.org/10.5735/085.058.0415 Search in Google Scholar

[51] West Midlands Mosses. Special Areas of Conservation. [Online]. [Accessed 21.12.2023]. Available: https://sac.jncc.gov.uk/site/UK0013595 Search in Google Scholar