[
Akyilmaz, O., Özlüdemir, M., Ayan, T., and Çelik, R. (2009). Soft computing methods for geoidal height transformation. Earth, planets and space, 61(7):825–833, doi:10.1186/BF03353193.10.1186/BF03353193
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Babak, O. and Deutsch, C. V. (2009). Statistical approach to inverse distance interpolation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(5):543–553.10.1007/s00477-008-0226-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Banasik, P., Bujakowski, K., Kudrys, J., and Ligas, M. (2020). Development of a precise local quasigeoid model for the city of Krakow – QuasigeoidKR2019. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 109(1):25–31, doi:10.2478/rgg-2020-0004.10.2478/rgg-2020-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borowski, Ł. and Banaś, M. (2019). The best robust estimation method to determine local surface. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 7(4):525–540, doi:10.22364/bjmc.2019.7.4.06.10.22364/bjmc.2019.7.4.06
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borowski, Ł. and Banasik, P. (2020). The conversion of heights of the benchmarks of the detailed vertical reference network into the PL-EVRF2007-NH frame. Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics, 109(1):1–7, doi:10.2478/rgg-2020-0001.10.2478/rgg-2020-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiles, J.-P. and Delfiner, P. (1999). Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470316993
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119115151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dawod, G. M. and Abdel-Aziz, T. M. (2020). Utilization of geographically weighted regression for geoid modelling in Egypt. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 14(1):1–12, doi:10.1515/jag-2019-0009.10.1515/jag-2019-0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elshambaky, H. T. (2018). Application of neural network technique to determine a corrector surface for global geopotential model using GPS/levelling measurements in Egypt. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 12(1):29–43, doi:10.1515/jag-2017-0017.10.1515/jag-2017-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gucek, M. and Bašić, T. (2009). Height transformation models from ellipsoidal into the normal orthometric height system for the territory of the city of Zagreb. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 53(1):17–38, doi:10.1007/s11200-009-0002-1.10.1007/s11200-009-0002-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hofmann-Wellenhof, B. and Moritz, H. (2006). Physical geodesy. Springer Science & Business Media.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jordan, S. K. (1972). Self-consistent statistical models for the gravity anomaly, vertical deflections, and undulation of the geoid. Journal of Geophysical Research, 77(20):3660–3670, doi:10.1029/JB077i020p03660.10.1029/JB077i020p03660
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaloop, M. R., Pijush, S., Rabah, M., Al-Ajami, H., Hu, J. W., and Zaki, A. (2021). Improving accuracy of local geoid model using machine learning approaches and residuals of GPS/levelling geoid height. Survey Review, pages 1–14, doi:10.1080/00396265.2021.1970918.10.1080/00396265.2021.1970918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, S.-K., Park, J., Gillins, D., and Dennis, M. (2018). On determining orthometric heights from a corrector surface model based on leveling observations, GNSS, and a geoid model. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 12(4):323–333, doi:10.1515/jag-2018-0014.10.1515/jag-2018-0014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ligas, M. (2022). Comparison of kriging and least-squares collocation–revisited. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 16(3):217–227, doi:10.1515/jag-2021-0032.10.1515/jag-2021-0032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ligas, M. and Szombara, S. (2018). Geostatistical prediction of a local geometric geoid-kriging and cokriging with the use of EGM2008 geopotential model. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 62(2):187–205, doi:10.1007/s11200-017-0713-7.10.1007/s11200-017-0713-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meier, S. (1981). Planar geodetic covariance functions. Reviews of geophysics, 19(4):673–686, doi:10.1029/RG019i004p00673.10.1029/RG019i004p00673
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moritz, H. (1972). Advanced least-squares methods, volume 175. Ohio State University Research Foundation Columbus, OH, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orejuela, I. P., González, C. L., Guerra, X. B., Mora, E. C., and Toulkeridis, T. (2021). Geoid undulation modeling through the Cokriging method–A case study of Guayaquil, Ecuador. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 12(5):356–367, doi:10.1016/j.geog.2021.04.004.10.1016/j.geog.2021.04.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radanović, M. and Bašić, T. (2018). Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models. Geodetski Vestnik, 62(1):68–78, doi:10.15292/geodetskivestnik.2018.01.68-78.10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2018.01.68-78
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schaffrin, B. (2001). Equivalent systems for various forms of kriging, including least-squares collocation. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen, 126(2):87–93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tusat, E. and Mikailsoy, F. (2018). An investigation of the criteria used to select the polynomial models employed in local GNSS/leveling geoid determination studies. Arabian journal of geosciences, 11(24):1–15, doi:10.1007/s12517-018-4176-0.10.1007/s12517-018-4176-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wackernagel, H. (2003). Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Springer Science & Business Media, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05294-5.10.1007/978-3-662-05294-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
You, R.-J. (2006). Local geoid improvement using GPS and leveling data: case study. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 132(3):101–107, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2006)132:3(101).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2006)132:3(101)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhong, D. (1997). Robust estimation and optimal selection of polynomial parameters for the interpolation of GPS geoid heights. Journal of Geodesy, 71(9):552–561, doi:10.1007/s001900050123.10.1007/s001900050123
]Search in Google Scholar
, e 