1. bookVolume 19 (2019): Edizione 3 (September 2019)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1804-1663
Prima pubblicazione
19 Feb 2010
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Information gaps in the market for social services: retirement homes in the Czech Republic

Pubblicato online: 19 Sep 2019
Volume & Edizione: Volume 19 (2019) - Edizione 3 (September 2019)
Pagine: 175 - 191
Ricevuto: 16 May 2019
Accettato: 02 Jul 2019
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1804-1663
Prima pubblicazione
19 Feb 2010
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Abstract

The research address a partial issue of market failure in the form of information asymmetry. Within the public sector, social services, together with health services, belong to typical sectors where the information superiority of supply against demand is detected. The presence of asymmetrical/imperfect information within the social care has a significant effect on retired people who demand the services of retirement homes, and this effect occurs before as well as during the consumption of this service. The paper aims to identify and evaluate the information gaps of 159 official websites of retirement homes in the Czech Republic that are related to the supply of offered services. The evaluated websites of the retirement homes were selected in a way including all three types of the legal form of retirement homes (semi-budgetary units of regions, limited liability companies, church legal entities) that are present in this category of social services in the Czech Republic. The multi-criteria evaluation, performed by using the TOPSIS method, included 14 types of information (criteria). The TOPSIS method is based on the selection of the variant that is the closest one to the ideal variant and that is characterized by a vector. The results show that retirement homes insufficiently disclose several types of information. These include the conditions of acceptance into the retirement home, annual reports, some types of contact information, internal rules of the home, and the electronic link for the communication with the retirement home. In relation to the evaluation of the total level of 14 types of information being disclosed on the websites of retirement homes, it was revealed that 3% of them achieve an excellent level, 30% achieve a lesser than excellent level, 60% achieve a low level, and 7% of retirement homes achieve a very low level.

Keywords

JEL Classification

ARDIELLI, E., BEČICA, J. (2018). Multi-criteria Evaluation of the State of Professional Theatres in the Czech Republic in Terms of Mixed Public Goods Provided to the Citizens. Review of economic Perspectives, 18 (2), 156-176. DOI:10.2478/revecp-2018-000910.2478/revecp-2018-0009Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

ARROW, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. The American Economic Review, 53 (5), 941-973.Search in Google Scholar

Association of Social Services Providers of the Czech Republic. (2010). Komparace služeb sociální péče o seniory. Tábor: Association of Social Services Providers of the Czech Republic. [online]. Retrieved January 21, 2018, from http://www.apsscr.cz/files/projekty/island_komparace.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

BARILE, S., SAVIANO, M. & POLESE, F. (2014). Information asymmetry and co-creation in health care service. Australasian Marketing Journal, 22 (3), 205-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.08.00810.1016/j.ausmj.2014.08.008Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

BLOOM, G., STANDING, H. & LLOYD, R. (2008). Markets, information asymmetry and health care: towards new social contracts. Social Science & Medicine, 66(10), 2076-2087. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.03410.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.034Search in Google Scholar

BOYER, M., MAHENC, P., MOREAUX, M. (2003). A symmetric information and product differentiation. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 33(1), 93-113. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-0462(01)00108-910.1016/S0166-0462(01)00108-9Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Czech Statistical Office. (2017). Senioři v mezinárodním srovnání 2017. [online]. Retrieved March 6, 2019, from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/seniori-v-cr-v-datech-2017Search in Google Scholar

Czech Social Security Administration. (2018). Důchodová statistika. [online]. Retrieved March 6, 2019, from https://www.cssz.cz/web/cz/duchodova-statistika#section_0Search in Google Scholar

FRANK, R.G., SALKEVER, D. S. (1994). Nonprofit Organizations in the Health Sector. Journal of Economics Perspectives, 8(4), 129-144. DOI: 10.1257/jep.8.4.12910.1257/jep.8.4.129Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

HAAS-WILSON, D. (2001). Arrow and the Information Market Failure in Health Care: The Changing Content and Sources of Health Care Information. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 26(5), 1031-1044. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-26-5-103110.1215/03616878-26-5-1031Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

HOLASOVÁ MALÍK, V. (2014). Kvalita v sociální práci a sociálních službách. Praha: Grada Publishing, a. s.Search in Google Scholar

HUANG, C., KU, Y. (2011). Effectiveness of Social Welfare Programmes in East Asia: A Case Study of Taiwan. Social Policy & Administration, 45(7), 733-751. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00794.x10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00794.xApri DOISearch in Google Scholar

JABLONSKÝ, J., DLOUHÝ, M. (2015). Modely hodnocení efektivnosti a alokace zdrojů. Praha: Professional Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

JANÍČKO, M, KOUBEK, I. (2012). Informační asymetrie a systém dvojího standardu ve vztahu zdravotník-pacient. Politická ekonomie, 60 (3), 362-379. DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.85410.18267/j.polek.854Search in Google Scholar

JUREČKA, V. a kol. (2018). Mikroekonomie. Praha: Grada Publishing, a. s.Search in Google Scholar

KERŠUIENE, V., ZAVADSKAS, E. K., TURSKIS, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara), Journal of Business Economics and Management. 11, 1611-1699, DOI: 10.3846/jbem.2010.1210.3846/jbem.2010.12Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

KUBALČÍKOVÁ, K., HAVLÍKOVÁ, J. (2016). Current Developments in Social Care Services for Older Adults in the Czech Republic: Trends Towards Deinstitutionalization and Marketization. Journal of Social Service Research. 42(2), pp. 180-198. DOI: 10.1080/01488376.2015.112901410.1080/01488376.2015.1129014Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

McCAUGHEY, D., BRUNING, N, S. (2010). Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers. Implementation Science, 5 (39), 1-13. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-3910.1186/1748-5908-5-39Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

MERTL, J. (2008). Přístupy k hodnocení efektivnosti sociálních služeb v národním hospodářství. Praha: Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of the Czech Republic. (2019). Registr poskytovatelů sociálních služeb. [Register of Social Service Providers]. Prague: Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. http://iregistr.mpsv.cz/socreg/vitejte.fw.do;jsessionid=7795B270B4189FB75A3035CEC13DB7E2.node1?SUBSESSION_ID=1555242256564_1Search in Google Scholar

NETTEN, A., DAVIES, B. (1990). The Social Production of Welfare and Consumption of Social Services. Journal of Public Policy, 10(3), 331-347. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X0000585710.1017/S0143814X00005857Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

OLSON, D. L. (2004). Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(7-8), 721-727. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.00310.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

PRŮŠA, L. (2007). Ekonomie sociálních služeb. Praha: ASPI, a. s.Search in Google Scholar

PRŮŠA, L., HORECKÝ, J. (2012). Poskytování služeb sociální péče pro seniory v České republice a ve Švýcarsku: mezinárodní komparace. Tábor: Association of Social Services Providers of the Czech Republic. [online]. Retrieved Februrary 2, 2019, from http://www.horecky.cz/images/1345613843_komparace-c-s.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

PRŮŠA, L. (2013). Ekonomická efektivity zajišťování péče o příjemce příspěvku na péči. Praha: Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí.Search in Google Scholar

ROBINSON, J. C. C. (2001). The End of Asymmetric Information. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 26(5), 1045-1053. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-26-5-104510.1215/03616878-26-5-1045Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

ROBLIN, B., DEBER, R., KULUSKI, K., SILVER, M. P. (2019) Ontario's Retirement Homes and Long-Term Care Homes: A Comparison of Care Services and Funding Regimes. Canadian Journal on Aging. Article in Press. DOI: 10.1017/S071498081800056910.1017/S0714980818000569Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

SEIFERT, A., SCHELLING, H. R. (2018). Attitudes Toward Aging and Retirement Homes Before and After Entry Into a Retirement Home. Journal of Housing for the Elderly. 32 (1) p. 12-25. DOI: 10.1080/02763893.2017.139348410.1080/02763893.2017.1393484Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

SCHAAD, M. (1998). Neziskové organizace v ekonomické teorii. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.Search in Google Scholar

SOJKA, M. (2002). Asymetrické informace a jejich důsledky pro metodologii ekonomie. Ekonomika, právo a politika, CEP: Sborník č. 19 “Investiční pobídky”. [online]. Retrieved Februrary 11, 2019, from http://www.cepin.cz/cze/kniha.php?ID=23Search in Google Scholar

STREIMIKIENE, D., BALEZENTIS, T., KRISCIUKAITIENE, I., BALEZENTIS, A. (2012). Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16(5), 3302–3311. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.06710.1016/j.rser.2012.02.067Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

VARIAN, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

VAVREK, R. KOTULIČ, R., ADAMIŠIN, P. (2015). Evaluation of municipalities management with the topsis technique emphasising on the impact of weights of established criteria. Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government. 13(2) 249-264, DOI: 10.4335/249-264(2015)10.4335/249-264(2015Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

VLACHANTONI, A. (2019). Unmet need for social care among older people. Ageing and Society. 39 (4), 657-684. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X1700111810.1017/S0144686X17001118Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

ZAVADSKAS, E. K., TURSKIS, Z., KILDIENE, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 20(1), 165–179. DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2014.89203710.3846/20294913.2014.892037Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

ZAVADSKAS, E. K., MARDANI, A., TURSKIS, Z., JUSOH, A., NOR, K. (2016). Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems: An Overview on Developments. From 2000 to 2015, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. 15 1-38, DOI: 10.1142/S0219622016300019.10.1142/S0219622016300019Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo