<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The doctrine of Chalcedon is sometimes criticized for being “static” and “ahistorical”. This article discusses the stimulus that an interesting expression found in the writings of the 6th century author Leontius of Byzantium – “the prosopon of the hypostasis of Christ” – can give to re-narrativising Christology. However important it is to identify the hypostasis in Christ, and explore how this hypostasis can also be human, it is also important to draw attention back to the historical role that this hypostasis plays at the centre of the narrative of salvation found in the gospels. Chalcedonian Christology learned to identify Jesus as the Eternal Son, “one of the Trinity”, but needs also to insist that he has taken on not just a human nature but also the specific prosopon of the Christ within human history.</p></abstract>

The doctrine of Chalcedon is sometimes criticized for being “static” and “ahistorical”. This article discusses the stimulus that an interesting expression found in the writings of the 6th century author Leontius of Byzantium – “the prosopon of the hypostasis of Christ” – can give to re-narrativising Christology. However important it is to identify the hypostasis in Christ, and explore how this hypostasis can also be human, it is also important to draw attention back to the historical role that this hypostasis plays at the centre of the narrative of salvation found in the gospels. Chalcedonian Christology learned to identify Jesus as the Eternal Son, “one of the Trinity”, but needs also to insist that he has taken on not just a human nature but also the specific prosopon of the Christ within human history.

From Chalcedon back to the Gospels: on the <italic>Prosopon</italic> of the <italic>Hypostasis</italic> of Christ

Review of Ecumenical Studies Sibiu

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

From Chalcedon back to the Gospels: on the  of the  of Christ

The doctrine of Chalcedon is sometimes criticized for being “static” and “ahistorical”. This article discusses the stimulus that an interesting expression...

From Chalcedon back to the Gospels: on the Prosopon of the Hypostasis of Christ

Pubblicato online: 21 gen 2020

Pagine: 391 - 408

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ress-2019-0028

Parole chiave
Leontius of Byzantium, Cyril of Alexandria, Council of Chalcedon, Second Council of Constantinople, hypostasis, prosopon, physis, Incarnation, Christ

© 2019 Declan O’Byrne, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

From Chalcedon back to the Gospels: on the Prosopon of the Hypostasis of Christ

Pubblicato online: 21 gen 2020

Pagine: 391 - 408

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ress-2019-0028

Parole chiaveLeontius of Byzantium, Cyril of Alexandria, Council of Chalcedon, Second Council of Constantinople, hypostasis, prosopon, physis, Incarnation, Christ

© 2019 Declan O’Byrne, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Parole chiave
Leontius of Byzantium, Cyril of Alexandria, Council of Chalcedon, Second Council of Constantinople, hypostasis, prosopon, physis, Incarnation, Christ