[
Arden, R. (2019). Cognitive abilities in other animals: An introduction to this special issue. Intelligence, 74, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.04.00310.1016/j.intell.2019.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Detterman, D.K. (2016, July), Intelligence research: 50 years of satisfaction. President’s invited address at the 17th Annual Conference of the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR), Saint-Petersburg, Russia. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF72oeDwbQU
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gottfredson, L.S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial With 51 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-810.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gottfredson, L.S. (2005). Suppressing intelligence research: Hurting those we intend to help. In R.H. Wright é N.A. Cummings (Eds.), Destructive trends in mental health: The well-intentioned path to harm (pp. 155–186). New York: Taylor & Francis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gottfredson, L.S. (2009). Logical fallacies used to dismiss the evidence on intelligence testing. In R. Phelps (Ed.), Correcting fallacies about educational and psychological testing (pp. 11–65). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haier, R.J. (2017). The Neuroscience of Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316105771
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haier, R.H. (2020). Academic freedom and social responsibility: Finding a balance. Intelligence, 82, 101482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.10148210.1016/j.intell.2020.101482
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunt, E. (2009). Good news, bad news, and a fallacy: A review of Outliers: The story of success. Intelligence, 37, 323–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.00310.1016/j.intell.2009.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kitcher, Ph. (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plomin, R., DeFries, J.C., Knopik, V.S. & Neiderhiser, J.M. (2016). Top 10 Replicated Findings from Behavioral Genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 3–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F174569161561743910.1177/1745691615617439
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rindermann, H., Becker, D., & Coyle, T.R. (2020). Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Intelligence research, experts’ background, controversial issues, and the media. Intelligence, 78, 101406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.10140610.1016/j.intell.2019.101406
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ritchie, S. (2015). Intelligence: All That Matters. London: John Murray Learning.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wai, J. (2020). Communicating intelligence research. Journal of Intelligence, 8, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence804004010.3390/jintelligence8040040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warne, R.T. (2020). In the Know: Debunking 35 Myths about Human Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108593298
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziman, J. (1976). The Force of Knowledge: The scientific dimension of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziman, J. (1994). Prometheus Bound: Science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511585067
]Search in Google Scholar
