Billroth-I anastomosis in distal subtotal gastrectomy for non-early gastric adenocarcinoma
Categoria dell'articolo: Research Article
Pubblicato online: 04 set 2023
Pagine: 356 - 363
Ricevuto: 20 apr 2023
Accettato: 27 lug 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0041
Parole chiave
© 2023 Sevak S Shahbazyan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Background
Billroth-I (B-I) anastomosis is known as a simple and physiological reconstruction method after distal subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Yet its role and oncological validity in non-early gastric adenocarcinoma (NEGA) remain unclear.
Patients and methods
Patients with NEGA without distant metastases operated between May 2004 and December 2020 were included. Surgical and oncologic outcomes of distal subtotal gastrectomy were studied in patients with B-I and Billroth II (B-II) anastomoses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for age, gender, tumor size, location, resection type, pT and pN stages.
Results
A total number of 332 patients underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy for NEGA followed by B-I and B-II anastomoses in 165 (49.7%) and 167 (50.3%) cases, respectively. B-I was applied in patients with smaller tumor size, less advanced pT stage and tumor location in the gastric antrum. The former was also associated with lower proportion of multiorgan resections and shorter operative time. After PSM, these differences became statistically non-significant, except operative time. Postoperative outcomes were similar before and after PSM. Greater lymph node yield was observed in patients with B-I anastomosis. The incidence of recurrence, specifically local recurrence was lower in patients with B-I anastomosis. However, this association was not statistically significant in the multivariable model. Median overall survival was 38 months, without significant differences between the groups.
Conclusions
The use of B-I anastomosis after distal subtotal gastrectomy for NEGA is associated with satisfactory surgical and oncologic outcomes. B-I anastomosis should be considered as a valid reconstruction method in these patients.