Correlation of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) evaluated by diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in children with Hodgkin lymphoma: a feasibility study
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Lancet Haematology. New guidelines for paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet Haematol 2020; 7: e851. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30371-9The Lancet HaematologyNew guidelines for paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma20207e85110.1016/S2352-3026(20)30371-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nagpal P, Akl MR, Ayoub NM, Tomiyama T, Cousins T, Tai B, et al. Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: biomarkers, drugs, and clinical trials for translational science and medicine. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 67551–73. doi: 10.18632/onco-target.11509NagpalPAklMRAyoubNMTomiyamaTCousinsTTaiBPediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: biomarkers, drugs, and clinical trials for translational science and medicine20167675517310.18632/onco-target.11509Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ansell SM. Hodgkin lymphoma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90: 1574–83. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.005AnsellSMHodgkin lymphoma: diagnosis and treatment20159015748310.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ehrhardt MJ, Flerlage JE, Armenian SH, Castellino SM, Hodgson DC, Hudson MM. Integration of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma treatment and late effects guidelines: seeing the forest beyond the trees. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19: 755–64. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7042EhrhardtMJFlerlageJEArmenianSHCastellinoSMHodgsonDCHudsonMMIntegration of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma treatment and late effects guidelines: seeing the forest beyond the trees2021197556410.6004/jnccn.2021.7042Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hoppe RT, Advani RH, Ai WZ, Ambinder RF, Armand P, Bello CM, et al. Hodgkin lymphoma, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18: p. 755–81. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0026HoppeRTAdvaniRHAiWZAmbinderRFArmandPBelloCMHodgkin lymphoma, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology2020187558110.6004/jnccn.2020.0026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kluge R, Kurch L, Georgi T, Metzger M. Current role of FDG-PET in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma. Semin Nucl Med 2017; 47: 242–57. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.01.001KlugeRKurchLGeorgiTMetzgerMCurrent role of FDG-PET in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma2017472425710.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.01.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 3059–68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800ChesonBDFisherRIBarringtonSFCavalliFSchwartzLHZuccaERecommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification20143230596810.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zaucha JM, Chauvie S, Zaucha R, Biggii A, Gallamini A. The role of PET/CT in the modern treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 77: 44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.06.002ZauchaJMChauvieSZauchaRBiggiiAGallaminiAThe role of PET/CT in the modern treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma201977445610.1016/j.ctrv.2019.06.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
El-Galaly TC, Villa D, Gormsen LC, Baech J, Lo A, Cheah CY. FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions. J Intern Med 2018; 284: 358–76. doi: 10.1111/joim.12813El-GalalyTCVillaDGormsenLCBaechJLoACheahCYFDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions20182843587610.1111/joim.12813Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kertész H, Beyer T, London K, Saleh H, Chung D, Rausch I, et al. Reducing radiation exposure to paediatric patients undergoing [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23: 775–86. doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01601-4KertészHBeyerTLondonKSalehHChungDRauschIReducing radiation exposure to paediatric patients undergoing [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging2021237758610.1007/s11307-021-01601-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Banka P, Geva T. Advances in pediatric cardiac MRI. Curr Opin Pediatr 2016; 28: 575–83. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000400BankaPGevaTAdvances in pediatric cardiac MRI2016285758310.1097/MOP.0000000000000400Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Daneman A. Special issue: Pediatric imaging. Acta Radiol 2013; 54: 982. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.12a008DanemanASpecial issue: Pediatric imaging20135498210.1258/ar.2012.12a008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Davis JT, Kwatra N, Schooler GR. Pediatric whole-body MRI: a review of current imaging techniques and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 44: 783–93. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25259DavisJTKwatraNSchoolerGRPediatric whole-body MRI: a review of current imaging techniques and clinical applications2016447839310.1002/jmri.25259Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shapira-Zaltsberg G, Wilson N, Trejo Perez E, Abbott L, Dinning S, Kapoor C, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared to (18 F)FDG PET/CT in initial staging and therapy response assessment of Hodgkin lymphoma in pediatric patients. Can Assoc Radiol J 2020; 71: 217–25. doi: 10.1177/0846537119888380Shapira-ZaltsbergGWilsonNTrejo PerezEAbbottLDinningSKapoorCWhole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared to (18 F)FDG PET/CT in initial staging and therapy response assessment of Hodgkin lymphoma in pediatric patients2020712172510.1177/0846537119888380Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bozdağ M, Er A, Çinkooğlu A. Histogram Analysis of ADC Maps for differentiating brain metastases from different histological types of lung cancers. Can Assoc Radiol J 2021; 72: 271–8. doi: 10.1177/0846537120933837BozdağMErAÇinkooğluAHistogram Analysis of ADC Maps for differentiating brain metastases from different histological types of lung cancers202172271810.1177/0846537120933837Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Juan CJ, Lin SC, Li YH, Chang CC, Jeng YH, Peng HH, et al. Improving interobserver agreement and performance of deep learning models for segmenting acute ischemic stroke by combining DWI with optimized ADC thresholds. Eur Radiol 2022; 32: 5371–81. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08633-6JuanCJLinSCLiYHChangCCJengYHPengHHImproving interobserver agreement and performance of deep learning models for segmenting acute ischemic stroke by combining DWI with optimized ADC thresholds20223253718110.1007/s00330-022-08633-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lee SM, Lee KW, Kim MA, Song YS, Goo JM, Park CM. Serial texture analyses on ADC maps for evaluation of antiangiogenic therapy in rat breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2019; 39: 1875–82. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13295LeeSMLeeKWKimMASongYSGooJMParkCMSerial texture analyses on ADC maps for evaluation of antiangiogenic therapy in rat breast cancer20193918758210.21873/anticanres.13295Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Manetta R, Palumbo P, Gianneramo C, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Natella R, et al. Correlation between ADC values and Gleason score in evaluation of prostate cancer: multicentre experience and review of the literature. Gland Surg 2019; 8(Suppl 3): S216–22. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.05.02ManettaRPalumboPGianneramoCBrunoFArrigoniFNatellaRCorrelation between ADC values and Gleason score in evaluation of prostate cancer: multicentre experience and review of the literature20198Suppl 3S2162210.21037/gs.2019.05.02Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation Coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126: 1763–8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864SchoberPBoerCSchwarteLACorrelation Coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation20181261763810.1213/ANE.0000000000002864Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schober P, Mascha EJ, Vetter TR. Statistics from A (Agreement) to Z (z Score): a guide to interpreting common measures of association, agreement, diagnostic accuracy, effect size, heterogeneity, and reliability in medical research. Anesth Analg 2021; 133: 1633–41. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005773SchoberPMaschaEJVetterTRStatistics from A (Agreement) to Z (z Score): a guide to interpreting common measures of association, agreement, diagnostic accuracy, effect size, heterogeneity, and reliability in medical research202113316334110.1213/ANE.0000000000005773Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Landis JR, Koch GG. Koch, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74. PMID: 843571LandisJRKochGGKoch, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data19773315974PMID: 843571Search in Google Scholar
Kamal NM, Elsaban K. Role of 18f-fdg-pet/ct in assessment of pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 65: 376–85. doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.16.02695-9KamalNMElsabanKRole of 18f-fdg-pet/ct in assessment of pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma2021653768510.23736/S1824-4785.16.02695-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Qiu L, Chen Y, Wu J. The role of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Hell J Nucl Med 2013; 16: 230–6. doi: 10.1967/s0024499100091QiuLChenYWuJThe role of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma201316230610.1967/s0024499100091Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Verhagen MV, Menezes LJ, Neriman D, Watson TA, Punwani S, Taylor SA, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for staging and interim response assessment in pediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma: a prospective study with (18) F-FDG PET/CT as the reference standard. J Nucl Med 2021; 62: 1524–30. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.260059VerhagenMVMenezesLJNerimanDWatsonTAPunwaniSTaylorSA(18)F-FDG PET/MRI for staging and interim response assessment in pediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma: a prospective study with (18) F-FDG PET/CT as the reference standard20216215243010.2967/jnumed.120.260059Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chu C, Gao Y, Lan X, Lin J, Thomas AM, Li S. Stem-cell therapy as a potential strategy for radiation-induced brain injury. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2020; 16: 639–49. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-09984-7ChuCGaoYLanXLinJThomasAMLiSStem-cell therapy as a potential strategy for radiation-induced brain injury2020166394910.1007/s12015-020-09984-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Linet MS, Slovis TL, Miller DL, Kleinerman R, Lee C, Rajaraman P, et al. Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 75–100. doi: 10.3322/caac.21132LinetMSSlovisTLMillerDLKleinermanRLeeCRajaramanPCancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures2012627510010.3322/caac.21132Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kollmann C, Jenderka KV, Moran CM, Draghi F, Jimenez Diaz JF, Sande R. EFSUMB clinical safety statement for diagnostic ultrasound - (2019 revision). Ultraschall Med 2020; 41: 387–9. doi: 10.1055/a-1010-6018KollmannCJenderkaKVMoranCMDraghiFJimenez DiazJFSandeREFSUMB clinical safety statement for diagnostic ultrasound - (2019 revision)202041387910.1055/a-1010-6018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Albano D, Bruno A, Patti C, Micci G, Midiri M, Tarella C, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in lymphoma: state of the art. Hematol Oncol 2020; 38: 12–21. doi: 10.1002/hon.2676AlbanoDBrunoAPattiCMicciGMidiriMTarellaCWhole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in lymphoma: state of the art202038122110.1002/hon.2676Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Galia M, Albano D, Tarella C, Patti C, Sconfienza LM, Mulè A, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance in indolent lymphomas under watchful waiting: the time is now. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 1187–93. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5071-xGaliaMAlbanoDTarellaCPattiCSconfienzaLMMulèAWhole-body magnetic resonance in indolent lymphomas under watchful waiting: the time is now20182811879310.1007/s00330-017-5071-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Spijkers S, Littooij AS, Kwee TC, Tolboom N, Beishuizen A, Bruin MCA, et al. Whole-body MRI versus an FDG-PET/CT-based reference standard for staging of paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: a prospective multicentre study. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 1494–504. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07182-0SpijkersSLittooijASKweeTCTolboomNBeishuizenABruinMCAWhole-body MRI versus an FDG-PET/CT-based reference standard for staging of paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: a prospective multicentre study202131149450410.1007/s00330-020-07182-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kıvrak AS, Paksoy Y, Erol C, Koplay M, Özbek S, Kara F. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multi-center phantom study. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013; 19: 433–7. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.13034KıvrakASPaksoyYErolCKoplayMÖzbekSKaraFComparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multi-center phantom study201319433710.5152/dir.2013.13034Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hoang-Dinh A, Nguyen-Quang T, Bui-Van L, Gonindard-Melodelima C, Souchon R, Rouvière O. Reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in normal prostate peripheral zone at 1.5T MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging 2022; 103: 545–54. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.06.001Hoang-DinhANguyen-QuangTBui-VanLGonindard-MelodelimaCSouchonRRouvièreOReproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in normal prostate peripheral zone at 1.5T MRI20221035455410.1016/j.diii.2022.06.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Newitt DC, Zhang Z, Gibbs JE, Partridge SC, Chenevert TL, Rosen MA, et al. Test-retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measures by breast DWI: results from the ACRIN 6698 trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 49: 1617–28. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26539NewittDCZhangZGibbsJEPartridgeSCChenevertTLRosenMATest-retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measures by breast DWI: results from the ACRIN 6698 trial20194916172810.1002/jmri.26539Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sadinski M, Medved M, Karademir I, Wang S, Peng Y, Jiang, et al. Short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient estimated from diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40: 2523–8. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0396-xSadinskiMMedvedMKarademirIWangSPengYJiangShort-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient estimated from diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate2015402523810.1007/s00261-015-0396-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar