[
1. Bloomer CW, Ackerman A, Bhatia RG. Imaging for spine tumors and new applications. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 17: 69-87.10.1097/RMR.0b013e31802bb38f17198224
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Schmorl G, Junghanns H. The human spine in health and disease. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1971.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Schrock WB, Wetzel RJ, Tanner SC, Khan MA. Aggressive hemangioma of the thoracic spine. Radiol Case Rep 2011; 5: 7-13.10.3941/jrcr.v5i10.828330346322470764
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Laredo JD, Assouline E, Gelbert F, Wybier M, Merland JJ, Tubiana JM. Vertebral hemangiomas: fat content as a sign of aggressiveness. Radiology 1990; 177: 467-72.10.1148/radiology.177.2.22177872217787
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Chen HI, Heuer GG, Zaghloul K, Simon SL, Weigele JB, Grady MS. Case report. Lumbarvertebral hemangioma presenting with the acute onset of neurological symptoms. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7: 80-5.10.3171/SPI-07/07/08017633493
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Cheung NK, Doorenbosch X, Christie JG. Rapid onset aggressive vertebral haemangioma. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27: 469-72.10.1007/s00381-011-1391-321246374
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Laredo JD, Reizine D, Bard M, Merland JJ. Vertebral Hemangiomas: radiologic evaluation. Radiology 1986; 161: 183-9.10.1148/radiology.161.1.37638643763864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Fox MW, Onofrio BM. The natural history and management of symptomatic and asymptomatic vertebral hemangiomas. J Neurosurg 1993; 78: 36-45.10.3171/jns.1993.78.1.00368416240
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Schick F, Bongers H, Jung WI, Skalej M, Lutz O, Claussen CD. Volumeselective proton MRS in vertebral bodies. Magn Reson Med 1992; 26: 207-17.10.1002/mrm.19102602031513248
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Schellinger D, Lin CS, Fertikh D, Lee JS, Lauerman WC, Henderson F, et al. Normal lumbar vertebrae: anatomic, age, and sex variance in subjects at proton MR spectroscopy - initial experience. Radiology 2000; 215: 910-6.10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn4291010831721
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Pavlisa1 G, Pavlisa G, Rados M. Diffusion differences between pilocytic astrocytomas and grade II ependymomas. Radiol Oncol 2011; 45: 97-101.10.2478/v10019-011-0011-x342372722933942
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Xu J, Shen J, Ding Y, Shen HY, Zeng ZP, Ma RF, et al. The clinical value of combined use of MR imaging and multi-slice spiral CT in limb salvage surgery for orthopaedic oncology patients: initial experience in nine patients. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46: 189-97.10.2478/v10019-012-0020-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Rodallec MH, Feydy A, Larousserie F, Anract P, Campagna R, Babinet A, et al. Diagnostic imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1019-41.10.1148/rg.284075156
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Baudrez V, Galant C, Van de Berg BC. Benign vertebral hemangioma: MRhistological correlation. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30: 442-6.10.1007/s002560100390
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, Le Gars D. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: Technique, indications, and results. Radiol Clin North Am 1998; 36: 533-46.10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70042-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Schellinger D, Lin CS, Hatipoglu HG, Fertikh D. Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1620-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Kugel H, Jung C, Schulte O, Heindel W. Age- and sex-specific differences in the 1H-spectrum of vertebral bone marrow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 263-8.10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<263::AID-JMRI1038>3.0.CO;2-M
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Schick F, Forster J, Einsele H, Weiss B, Lutz O, Claussen CD. Magnetization transfer in hemopoietic bone marrow examined by localized proton spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 792-802.10.1002/mrm.1910340604
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Layer G, Träber F, Block W, Bräucker G, Kretzer S, Flacke S, et al. 1H MR spectroscopy of the lumbar spine in diffuse osteopenia due to plasmacytoma or osteoporosis. Rofo 1998; 169: 596-600. 10.1055/s-2007-1015347
]Search in Google Scholar