[
Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). Developing focus group research: politics, theory, and practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781849208857
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bartunek, J.M., & Woodman, R.W. (2015). Beyond Lewin: Toward a temporal approximation of organization development and change. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol. 2, 157-182.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111353
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baruch, Y., & Nicholson, N. (1997). Home, Sweet Work: Requirements for Effective Home Working. Journal of General Management, Vol. 23, 15-30.10.1177/030630709702300202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belzunegui-Eraso, A., & Erro-Garces, A. (2020). Teleworking in the context of the COVID-19 crisis. Sustainability, J58; J81; F6.10.3390/su12093662
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boje, D.M. (2019). Organizational research: Storytelling in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boje, D.M., Oswick, C., & Ford, J.D. (2004). Language and organization: The doing of discourse. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 29, Issue 4, 571-577.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bridges, W. (1991). Making the most of change. Managing Transitions. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bridges, W. (2004). Transitions: Making sense of life's changes. Lebanon, IN: Da Capo Lifelong Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bridges, W. (2009). Managing transitions: Making the most of change. Lebanon, IN: Da Capo Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bridges, W., & Mitchell, S. (2000). Leading transition: A new model for change. Leader to Leader, Vol. 16, Issue 3, 30-36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brisson-Banks, C.V. (2010). Managing change and transitions: A comparison of different models and their commonalities. Library Management, Vol. 31, Issue 4/5, 241-252.10.1108/01435121011046317
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burrell, D., Barnard-Zaffino, M., & Ulomi, S. (2014). An applied research analysis of telework programmes as an environmentally-friendly policy and a viable sustainability development leadership practice. International Journal of Environmental Policy and Decision Making (IJEPDM), Vol. 1, No. 2.10.1504/IJEPDM.2014.067577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burrell, D.N. (2019). A Contextual Exploration of the Emergence of Technical Sociology in the Realm of Organizational Technology Management and Cybersecurity Management. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology. Vol. 8, Issue 3. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2607817
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burrell, D.N. (2020). Understanding the talent management intricacies of remote cybersecurity teams in covid-19 induced telework organizational ecosystems. Land Forces Academy Review, Vol. 25, Issue 3, 232-244.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bushe, G., & Marshak, R. (2009). Revisioning Organizational Development: Diagnostic and Dialogic Premises and Patterns of Practice. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 45, 348-368.10.1177/0021886309335070
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buttazzoni, M. (2009). From workplace to anyplace, assessing the opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with virtual meetings and telecommuting. World Wildlife Fund.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, J.K., Beckman, S.L., & Lawrence, P.G. (2007). Workplace design. A new managerial imperative. California Management Review, Vol. 49, Issue 2, 6-22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chung, H., (2018). Future of Work and Flexible Working in Estonia: The case of employee-friendly flexibility. Available at: http://www.wafproject.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ciulli, F., & Kolk, A. (2019). Incumbents and business model innovation for the sharing economy: Implications for sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, 214, 995-1010.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.295
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clements-Croome, D.J., & Kaluarachchi, Y. (2000). Assessment and measurement of productivity. Creating the Productivity Workplace: 129-166. Spon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (2006). Narrative inquiry. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research. (3rd Edition, pp. 477-487). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooperrider, D. (1986). Appreciative inquiry: Toward a methodology for understanding and enhancing organizational innovation. (Doctoral dissertation). Available on: ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 8611485)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooperrider, D., & Srivasta, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In R.W. Woodman & W.A. Pasmore (Eds.). Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129-169). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (1999). A positive revolution in change: Appreciative inquiry. Taos, NM: Corporation for Positive Change.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Chicago: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (2001). Organization development and change. 7th Edition, Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern College.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (2008). Organization development and change. Mason, OH. South Western.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deshpande, A., Sharp, H., Barroca, L., & Gregory, P. (2016). Remote working and collaboration in agile teams. ICIS Conference on Managing is Projects and is Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evangelakos, G. (2020). Keeping critical assets safe when teleworking is the new norm. Network Security, Vol. 6, 11-14.10.1016/S1353-4858(20)30067-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gelston, G.M., Wells, C., & Dalton, A. (2018, June). Virtual leadership in complex multiorganizational research and development programs. IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA).10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423974
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green, D.D. (2018). Fueling the gig economy: a case study evaluation of Upwork.com. Management and Economics Research Journal, Vol. 4, 3399.10.18639/MERJ.2018.04.523634
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guyot, K., & Sawhill, I., (2020). Telecommuting will likely continue long after the pandemic. The Brookings Institution, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/04/06/telecommuting-will-likely-continue-long-after-the-pandemic/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hagy, M.R. (2018). Trust at no sight: Establishing trust in the process rather than in the individual members of a global virtual team. Temple University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ilie, M., Ilie, C., & Marin, R. (2020). Human Resources and Communication Management after Changes Due to COVID 19 pandemic. Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences, Vol. 20, Issue 1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Katsabian, T. (2020). The telework virus: How the covid-19 pandemic has affected telework and exposed its implications for privacy and equality. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.368470210.2139/ssrn.3684702
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, V., & Coghlan, A. (2020). Measuring the Factors of Teleworking Productivity and Engagement in a New Reality of COVID-19: The Case of Austria, Germany, and Russia. Doctoral dissertation, Wien.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leung, L. (2004). Societal, organizational, and individual factors in the adoption of telework. Impact and issues in news media: Toward intelligent societies, 149-171.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marshak, R.J. (1993). Lewin meets Confucius: a review of the O.D. model of change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 29, 393-415.10.1177/0021886393294002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, K.A. (2018). Study of productivity rates for geographically distributed agile teams. Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niles, J. (1999). Integrating telework, flextime, and officing for workforce 2020. Hudson Institute Center for Workforce Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Keefe, S. (2008). Shifting Federal Telework into Drive. Public Manager. Vol. 37, Issue 1, 47-49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papmehl, A. (2001). Remote Access. CMA Management, Vol. 75, Issue 3, 11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quisenberry, W.L. (2018). Exploring how emotional intelligence contributes to virtual teams: Interpretive analysis of a phenomenological study. European Scientific Journal, Vol. 14, Issue 5, 19-36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosengren, C., Ottosson, M., Daniels, J., Gregory, K., & Cottom, T.M. (2017). Employee monitoring in a digital context. Digital sociologies, 181-194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rousseau, D.M. (1977). Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction, and motivation: A synthesis of job design research and socio-technical systems theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 18-42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schein, E.G. (1999). Process Consultation Revisited: Building the Helping Relationship. Reading, MA. Addison-Wesley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schlossberg, N.K. (1981). A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition. The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 9, Issue 2, 2-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schlossberg, N.K. (2011). The challenge of change: The transition model and its applications. Journal of Employment Counseling, Vol. 48, Issue 4, 159-163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaver, K. (2003). Steering Employers Toward Telework. The Washington Post. pg. B.01.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shin, B., El Sawy, O.A., Sheng, O.R.L., & Higa, K. (2000). Telework: Existing research and future directions. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol 10, Issue 2, 85-101.10.1207/S15327744JOCE1002_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shufutinsky, A. (2019a). From Salutes to Staff Meetings: A Triangulated Qualitative Inquiry Study of the Experiences of Wounded Warriors in Post-Military Corporate Positions. ProQuest Dissertations.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shufutinsky, A. (2019b). Holoportation: An Innovation That Will Disrupt and Transform Organization Development and Management Consulting. Journal of Leadership and Innovation Management, Vol. 5, Issue 1, 1-34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shufutinsky, A. (2020). Employing Use of Self for Transparency, Rigor, Trustworthiness, and Credibility in Qualitative Organizational Research Methods. Organization Development Review, Vol. 52, Issue 1, 50-58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shufutinsky, A., DePorres, D., Long, B., & Sibel, J. (2020). Shock Leadership Development for the Modern Era of Pandemic Management and Preparedness. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 1-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shufutinsky, A., Sibel, J., Murray Hayden, P., Shufutinsky, D., & Cox, R. (2018). Holoportation: The Disruptive Technology that Will Change the Practice of Conflict Analysis and Resolution. O.D. Practitioner, Vol. 50, Issue 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shufutinsky, A., Sibel, J.R., Beach, A.A., & Saraceno, A.J. (2020). O.D. for Robots? Industry 4.0, Emerging Technologies and the Implications on Organizational Talent Acquisition and Development Practices. Organization Development Journal, Vol. 38, Issue 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silva, A.L., & Merino, G.S.A. (2017). Potentialities of remote teams in the innovation process in an organization through the design management. Strategic Design Research Journal, Vol. 10, Issue 3, 204-214.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tan-Solano, M., & Kleiner, B. (2001). Effects of telecommuting on organizational behavior. Management Research, Vol. 24, Issue 3/4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taskin, L., & Bridoux, F., (2010). Telework: A challenge to knowledge transfer in organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 21, Issue 13, 2503-2520.10.1080/09585192.2010.516600
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thatchenkery, T., & Metzker, C. (2006). Appreciative Intelligence: Seeing the mighty oak in the acorn. San Francisco, CA. Berrett-Koehler.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Climate Group. (2008). SMART 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United States Bureau of Transportation Services. (2006). Transportation Implications of Telecommuting. National Transportation Library a Program of the Bureau of Transportation Services.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus Group Interviews on Education and Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452243641
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verive, J., & DeLay, N. (2006). Measuring telework ROI: Metrics based on the employee life cycle. World at Work Journal, Vol. 15, Issue 2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., & Jenkins, D.P. (2008). A review of socio-technical systems theory: a classic concept for new command and control paradigms. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Vol. 9, Issue 6, 479-499.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watson Wyatt Worldwide. (2000). Human Capital Index Report. Washington, DC: Watson Wyatt Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wendell, L.F., & Cecil, B. (1999). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement. Pearson College Division.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wojcak, E., Bajzikova, L., Sajgalikova, H., & Polakova, M. (2016). How to achieve sustainable efficiency with teleworkers: Leadership model in telework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 229, 33-41.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.111
]Search in Google Scholar
