Accesso libero

Geopolitical View of Ukraine: History of Development and Specifics of its Current Transformation

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Characteristic features and achievements of Historical Stage 2 of Ukraine's geopolitical view formation.

Historical Stage 2 (early 20th century–1991) – fundamental
Main features:

strengthening of national and political movements;

emergence of the first scientifically developed geopolitical ideas and visions;

study of possible geopolitical alliances for the pursuit of Ukrainian interests;

at the beginning of the 20th c., establishment of the Ukrainian People's Republic and the Western Ukrainian People's Republic, with their subsequent unification;

from the mid-20th c., unification of the entire Ukrainian territory within the Ukrainian Soviet Socialistic Republic as a union republic of the USSR (Soviet Union).

Main historical events As a result of the overthrown of the monarchy and the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917, professor Mykhailo Hrushevsky formed the Ukrainian People's Republic in Kyiv, which, after the beginning of the Ukrainian-Bolshevik war in 1918, declared its independence and concluded an agreement with Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. After the capitulation of Germany in World War I, the Bolsheviks created the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic in 1919 in Kharkiv and established Soviet control in Central, Eastern and Southern Ukraine until 1920.The disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in October 1918 resulted in the formation of the Western Ukrainian People's Republic, which lasted until the beginning of 1921, when the western territories of Ukraine were ceded to Poland and the south-western territories to Romania and the Czech Republic. In the 1920s and 1930s in Western Ukraine, an anti-Polish liberation movement (the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists) was created, with the goal to establish a Ukrainian conciliar independent state; this movement continued its clandestine activities even after Western Ukraine's accession to the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic.In 1922, the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, together with the Bolshevik republics of Russia, Belarus and the Caucasus, concluded an agreement on the formation of the USSR, by which all western and south-western territories of Ukraine were ceded to the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic during World War II, hence, from that time until Ukraine's independence, all the territories of modern Ukraine became part of the Soviet Union.
Major achievements

substantiation of the idea of a full state independence of Ukraine and expediency to consider its territory on the ethnic principle in the works of Hrushevsky (1866–1934);

in the works of Rudnytsky (1877–1937)—analysis of the world geopolitical system and the place of Ukraine in it; proof of the necessity of Ukraine's independence and the creation of Galician statehood as its intermediate variant; substantiation of the priority of the national rather than geographical principle in the formation of the states of a new Europe; substantiation of the idea of the Baltic-Pontic Federation, as opposed to Russian expansion;

as a result of the activities of Skrypnyk (1872–1933) and other national democrats, support was given to ethnic Ukrainians outside the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic, and the expediency of expanding its borders at the expense of neighbouring ethnic Ukrainian territories was developed;

Synyavsky (1866–1951) studied in his works the geopolitical processes in Europe; substantiated the expediency of ‘Pan-Europe’ formation; studied the economic interests of the USSR in the Middle East;

Khvylovy (1893–1933) substantiated in his works the need to reorient Ukrainian literature to Europe and overcome dependence on Russian culture;

in the works of Bochkovsky (1884–1939) the theoretical basis of ethnopolitics was formed, the author considered it as a science that studies the specifics of the relationship between nation and state;

in the works of Lypynsky (1882–1931) a sociological theory was developed, where the nation was formed based on ‘territorial patriotism’; the author studied the issue of cultural division of Ukrainians and the need for their harmonious combination;

the idea of creating the Adriatic Union (Ukraine, Czechoslovakia, Balkan Slavic countries) based on mental and historical commonality in the works of Tomashivsky (1864–1938) and Shelukhin (1864–1938) was developed;

substantiation of the idea of the ‘Black Sea Doctrine’ in the works of Lypa (1900–1944), in which the Black Sea basin had to unite the territories that belonged to it into a powerful political unit;

in the works of Kubiyovych (1900–1985), the right of Ukrainian ethnic lands to unite into a single Ukrainian state was proved; the author politically and geographically substantiated and supported the independence of Carpathian Ukraine;

as a result of the activities of the ‘main liberation council’ formed in July 1944, the idea of the formation of the Ukrainian independent conciliar state was developed and the idea of cooperation with all the enslaved peoples of Europe and Asia was proclaimed;

in the works of the intelligentsia of the emigrant movement in the 1950s, ethnopolitical and geopolitical problems of the Ukrainian people were studied and the idea that the balance of nation-states can become a guarantee of a new international order was developed.

Sosnovsky (1919–1975) in his works analysed the activities of Ukrainian foreign forces and studied the reasons for the lack of their significant results;

as a result of the activities of the young creative intelligentsia called ‘the sixties’ (1960–1970) the expediency of the development of Ukrainian literature was substantiated; the reasons of the crisis of the Ukrainian nation, its culture, ideology, identity were explained;

as a result of the resistance movement to the Soviet regime (1970–1980) called ‘dissidents’, the negative influence of Soviet ideology on all spheres of public life of ethnic Ukrainians was substantiated, a new worldview about the future of Ukrainian lands within the Soviet Union and abroad was formed.

SWOT analysis of the geopolitical location of Ukraine.

List of main characteristics
Strengths

the state territory has unique natural conditions, including sufficiently fertile soils, a significant amount of minerals, favourable climatic conditions;

sufficient road development and Ukraine's access to the seas;

significant length of state borders;

location of the state's territory in the geographical centre of Europe and geographically advantageous location of Ukraine on the cross-border of Europe and Asia—trade routes between Europe and Asia intersect in its territory;

the state's membership in the Baltic-Black Sea-Caspian region and its transit position between the Caspian region, the Middle East and Europe;

Ukraine's international transit potential related to its position in the pan-European transport zone of the Black Sea basin;

favourable transit position of Ukraine for the transport of Russian energy to Europe;

institutional cooperation of the state with a large number of international organisations of regional and global nature and Ukraine's participation in the formation of regional integration within the Baltic-Black Sea-Caspian region (the Organization for Democracy and Economic Development (GUAM) and The Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC).

Weaknesses

cultural, mental and ideological differences between the East and the West of the state, their insufficient connection in the process of historical formation of Ukrainian statehood;

problems with the demarcation of the land border with Belarus and Moldova and lack of a maritime border with Russia;

diversity of views about the state's regional affiliation and orientation;

Ukraine's dependence on the Russian energy transport and insufficient provision of the state with its own energy resources, as well as insufficient use of alternative energy resources;

suboptimal geographical structure of foreign trade relations (predominance of regional cooperation over international).

Opportunities

introduction of an effective regional policy to overcome the disparities in regional economic development;

implementation of all possible means to overcome the demographic crisis and the return of Ukrainian labour migrants to their homeland;

ensuring a system of optimal relations between ethnic Ukrainians and ethno-national minorities;

purposeful formation of a positive and objective image of Ukraine in the world mass media;

implementation of effective practical geopolitics within the state borders to eliminate problematic issues of territorial and political integrity of the state, creating favourable conditions for its domestic and foreign policy development;

gradual, purposeful exit from the (political, economic, cultural and information) power field of Russia without the use of provocative actions and with the preservation and strengthening of its position in the Russian (sub-regional) market;

formation and implementation of a geostrategy based on the priority of national interests, development of aggregate capacity, greater international prestige and a comprehensive understanding of global and European processes.

Threats

presence of a large number of political parties and diversity of their orientations;

regional disparities in socio-economic development levels;

ongoing serious demographic crisis, which was the result of population aging, declining birth rates and mass illegal labour migration to better developed neighbouring countries;

penetration of illegal migrants, contraband, goods, drugs and criminal groups through the problematic areas of the border;

existence of a common border with the self-proclaimed Transnistrian Moldavian Republic and the proximity to the conflict-generating Caucasus region, which have become centres of political and military tension;

geographical position of Ukraine in the so-called buffer zone between regional economic (EU and the Russian Federation) and military-political centres of global power (NATO and the Russian Federation);

expansionist policy and geopolitical pressure from Russia which are aimed at the dissociation of Ukrainian society with further intentions of full control over the situation in Ukraine. As the result of such policy, since 2014 bloody war in eastern Ukraine has begun and two self-proclaimed republics in its eastern territories have been formed—Lugansk People's Republic and Donetsk People's Republic. Moreover, in 2014 Russia annexed Ukrainian Crimea.

The characteristic features and achievements of Historical Stage 1 of Ukraine's geopolitical view formation.

Historical Stage 1 (9th century–early 20th century) – primary
Main features:

first attempts at Ukrainian statehood formation;

emergence of first ideas about Ukrainian geopolitical subjectivity;

evaluation of the role and importance of Ukrainian ethnic lands inside and outside the states to which they belonged;

germination of first Ukrainian geopolitical view.

Main sub-stages and their historical features Most important achievements
Sub-stage 1a (9th c.–15th c.)From the 9th c. to the middle of the 13th c. Ukrainian lands became the centre of Kievan Rus, and from the 13th c. to the 14th c. – the Galicia-Volyn state (West and South-West territories).At the end of the 14th c., Ukrainian lands became under the rule of Lithuania (northern, central and partly western lands) and Poland (southwestern territories) – in the 16th c., both states united in the Commonwealth; the southern steppe of Ukraine was under the rule of the Crimean Khanate, formed in 1447, and Transcarpathia under the rule of Hungary.

appearance of the first data about territorial and political information about Ukrainian lands (chronicles of Kievan Rus and the Galicia-Volyn state), which described the territory of Kievan Rus, division into tribes, the nature of dynastic relations, the place of Kievan Rus in the political world of those times.

Sub-stage 1b (15th c.–18th c.)In the 15th c., in the southern territory of wild steppes Cossacks appeared, who formed a special social status of warriors. In the middle of the 17th c., under the leadership of Bohdan Khmelnytsky, they created a self-governing Ukrainian state on the territory of modern central Ukraine – ‘Zaporozhian Sich’, which was finally destroyed in the 18th c.

as a result of the liberation war, Ukrainian statehood was restored;

hetmans’ governments were oriented towards creating broad international coalitions;

important international agreements were signed;

the first cartographic materials and descriptions of Ukrainian lands by foreign researchers appeared, like works of the French engineer Boplan (1600–1673);

in the Constitution by Orlyk (1710) the basic democratic principles of the independent Cossack Ukraine political organisation were explained.

Sub-stage 1c (18th c.–early 20th c.)From the end of 18th c., Ukrainian ethnic lands were divided by Austria-Hungary (western and south-western territories) and by the Russian Empire (received the rest). In the territories belonging to Austria-Hungary:

representatives of the ‘Russian Trinity’ substantiated the idea of the unity of Ukrainians in the West and East and their separation from the Poles and Russians and demanded the autonomy of Ukrainian lands in Galicia (south-western territory);

based on socialist consideration, the idea of an independent Ukraine was developed by the first political parties, which was explained in the work ‘Ukraine irredenta’ by Bachynsky (1895).

In the territories belonging to the Russian Empire:

in 1845–1846, representatives of the Cyril and Methodius Brotherhood developed the idea to create a Slavic Federation, one of the leading republics of which Ukraine had to be;

in the works of Drahomanov (1841–1895) the idea of Ukrainian autonomy as a part of federal Russia was proclaimed;

during this period, there was an increase in the number of scientific works on the study of Ukrainian people, including the first map of the settlement of Ukrainians by Velychko (1896); ethnic map of Subcarpathian Rus by Tomashivsky (1910); works of ethnographers, historians, conclusions of linguists.

The structure of geopolitical interests of Ukraine at the present stage.

1. Geopolitical interests at national level

protection of sovereignty, territorial integrity and security of the state and its population;

fight against any manifestations of anti-Ukrainian activities such as separatism, political extremism, corruption, attempts to federalise the state, etc.;

completion of the anti-terrorist operation in the east of the state and resolution of contentious territorial issues within its borders;

gradual reform of the state's defence sector in accordance with the main challenges of today or potential threats;

overcoming cultural and ideological contradictions between the East and the West of the state;

prevention of Ukrainian cultural and spiritual identity loss under the influence of external forces;

providing the state with sufficient information support to protect its own interests and counteract external information pressure.

2. Geopolitical interests at regional level

diversification of energy supply sources and ways, reduction of energy dependence on Russia;

ensuring stable political, economic and democratic development and as a result, the formation of Ukraine as a powerful regional leader;

strengthening state participation in regional cooperation measures to combat piracy, terrorism, internationally organised crime, illegal transport of arms and illegal migration, as well as intensifying Ukraine's participation in Operation Black Sea Harmony to control shipping in the Black Sea;

implementation of such foreign policy activities that would provide Ukraine with the status of a guarantor of stability in South-Eastern Europe and the Black Sea-Caucasus region.

3. Geopolitical interests at global level

active support of the Ukrainian diaspora abroad and as a result, the formation of additional channels for the pursuit of the state's interests outside its borders;

increasing the state's economic potential and its economic security by integration into the world economy, as well as into the European energy and transport system;

the legal framework to improve the investment climate in Ukraine, protecting key sectors of Ukraine's economy from the possible foreign control, strengthening competitiveness of domestic products in domestic and foreign markets;

further development and improvement of the state transport infrastructure to intensify its activities in the system of international transport corridors;

balanced development of relations with the USA/NATO/EU with the further realisation of Ukraine's Euro-Atlantic intention.

developing Ukraine's participation in the activity of international and regional organisations in which the country is a member;

strengthening of Ukraine's participation in international peacekeeping missions, including its participation in solving the Transnistria and the Caucasus conflicts;

combating the spread of the coronavirus pandemic, overcoming its effects and implementing measures to solve this problem at international level;

Ukraine's formation as a strong independent subject of international relations, able to defend its own national interests, which does not depend on the geopolitical orientation of the neighbouring states and the ambitions of other regional leaders.

eISSN:
2081-6383
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Geosciences, Geography