In the last decade, nature tourism in Albania has been developed significantly, but people have only limited knowledge about the Earth's history and geomorphological processes. In order to increase scientific education, protect geoheritage and develop social and economic aspects especially in rural areas, geotourism should be promoted. According to Gordon (2018), today geotourism is essentially a cultural response to the physical landscape. Furthermore, the first attempts to define geotourism were made by (Hose 1995, 2003, 2005, 2011, Hose et al. (2011). A modern definition of geotourism is made by Hose and Vasiljevic (2012) is as follows:
In a more general sense, geotourism should be understood as tourism that sustains or enhances the geographical character of a place-its environment, culture, aesthetics, heritage and the well-being of its residents (Sharples 2002, National Geographic 2005). Both meanings express their features, such as geological- and geomorphological-based features, environmental education, tourist satisfaction, sustainable development and locally beneficial (Newsome, Dowling (Eds.) 2010, Newsome et al., 2012), so it's important to be part of Albanian's tourism management strategies.
Albania has an inventory of geoheritage identified by geological and geographical researcher such as (Frashëri 2012, Qiriazi, Sala 2006, Serjani et al. 2003) but the designations of qualitative values of geosites are a few. According to (Panizza 2001, Reynard 2005, Reynard, Panizza 2005, Reynard et al. 2016), geosites are portions of geosphere that present a particular importance to the comprehension of the Earth history, geological and geomorphological objects that have acquired a scientific, cultural/historical, aesthetic and/or social/economic values due to human perception or exploration, as part of geodiversity and geoheritage (Gray 2004). Several geosite assessment models are found in scientific studies, created by researches such as (Boskov et al. 2015, Pereira 2010, Pereira et al. 2007, Pralong 2005, Reynald 2005, Reynard, Panizza 2005, Tomić, Božić 2014, Vujicić et al. 2011, etc. The geosite assessment model (GAM) created by (Vujicić et al. 2011) is chosen in our study, which has been extensively used in different European areas with good results. This method is also used in other articles (Braholli, Menkshi 2019, Braholli, Miçi 2020), which produced good qualitative assessment of geosites in other regions of Albania. According to Kubalíková (2013) assessment has to be done based on knowledge and existing detailed inventory of the potential geosites. So this article highlights the current state, their scientific, education, aesthetic and additional values (AV) of the present geosites in Durrës municipality.
Durrës is a small municipality located in a coastal area, on the west part of the republic of Albania, rich in capes, ridges, estuaries and sea bays. The area of Durrës covers only 1% (332 km2) of the Albanian territory, defined by longitudinal extension north-south of about 36 km and a width of 19 km (as seen in Fig. 1). Durrës ‘is washed’ from Adriatic Sea in its western part. The territory of Durrës has started its formation from the Quaternary period (the last 1.8 million years, when the territory came out of the water) and continues even today. Lithology is expressed in quaternary deposits, with continental, intermediate, and marine genesis (Qiriazi 2019). Active tectonic plates characterised by frequent seismic activity have destroyed the region of Durrës in the year 335, 506, 1273 A.D. (Muço 1996). The last seismic activity that was recorded on November 26, 2019 had a magnitude of 8 (IGEUM 2019) that caused changes in the morphology of the relief. The forms of reliefs are created in anticline and syncline structures, renewed form the neo-tectonic, which is still active (Braholli 2016). When considered in the physical-geographical aspect, it is located in the Western Lowlands, in the field of Durrës and the surrounding hills (Qiriazi 2001, 2011, 2019, Shqipërisë 1990, Ziu 2015) (Fig. 2). The highest peaks are found in Rodon–Erzeni Hills (272 m) and also in the Durrës Mountain (178 m). Most of the territory is plain, where crypto-depressions (−8 m) are present, because the swamp of Durrës was reclaimed in the last century (Pano 2015).
The territory is rich in hydrographic assets (sea, rivers, lagoons), with different types of soils and biodiversity. The rock composition, tectonic movements, Mediterranean climate and marine activity resulted in several types of relief forms such as beaches, capes, peaks, which are natural resources with geotouristic potential. These forms of relief provide evidence of high geodiversity and good opportunities for the development of geotourism. Through the geological and topographic map (1:25,000) of Durresi, we identify the forms of relief with geotouristic potential and they are: Kepi i Rodonit (Cape of Rodon), Kepi i Palit (Cape of Paul), Plazhi i Shën Pjetrit (St. Peter's beach), Plazhi i Kallmit (Kallmi beach) and Shkëmbi i Kavajës (Kavaja Rock) (Fig. 2). The focus of this article is to come up with a detailed analysis of geosites with a geotouristic importance. Apart from natural heritage, Durrës preserves its cultural heritage, defined in underground and above its surface, expressed in archaeological sites, architectural constructions (amphitheatre, castle, baths), cult monuments, artistic and ethnographic features, which completes the tourist offer. The municipality of Durrës has a long historical development from XX century B.C. until now (Xaxa, Shuka 2002), with a population of 320,000 inhabitants (Durrës 2018) living in 3 urban areas and 39 villages (Zyrtare 2014). The territory has a high population density (964 b/km2), but the level of human pressure in damaging the geosites is lower. Geosites are defined as Earth's surfaces that are important for the knowledge of the Earth, climate and life history (Reynard, Panizza 2005). Geological forms are part of the Earth's geo-heritage, to which people give cultural, artistic, spiritual, scientific, educational values, and finally tourist values. Albanian's literature has used the concept of geomonuments (Zyrtare 2002, Serjani et al. 2003, Qiriazi, Sala 2006, Frashëri 2012) for the Protected Areas of third category (Dudley 2008), which includes geological and geomorphological features. Our study will focus only on the geosites/geomonuments with geotouristic potential for the municipality of Durrës.
This study is carried out based on the opinions of 12 experts (geologists and geographer), who have knowledge especially about these geosites. The experts answered 27 closed questions, estimating each geosite. The questionnaire was designed based on the indicators and subindicators (values) of GAM methodology. This method consists of two sets of values: MV and AV. The MV include scientific/educational values, aesthetic/scenic values and protection values. AV include functional and tourist values. Scientific and educational values VSE consist of 4 sub-indicators proposed by (Pereira 2010, Pereira et al. 2007, Reynard et al. 2007), which cannot be understood by a wide audience without additional components.
Scientific and educational values include the level of rarity, representativeness, knowledge and interpretation (Vujicić et al. 2011). Scenic and aesthetic values VSA are included in the MV, because they are very important over time. This indicator includes viewpoints of sub-indicators, surfaces, surrounding landscapes and environmental fitting of sites. Protection VPr is seen as a main value, because it is an important activity before the promotion and development of tourism as a whole (Vijicić et al. 2011). The features that make geosites to have a high level of protection are current conditions, the level of protection, vulnerability and number of visitors allowed.
AV, are divided into two indicators, functional values VFn and touristic values VTr. Functional values VFn consist of several subindicators, such as accessibility, additional natural values, additional cultural values, distance to emissive centre and vicinity of important roads. These aren’t direct elements of tourism, but directly affect the development of geotourism. Touristic values VTr, assess the current state of tourist services, including promotion, organised visits, vicinity of visitors centre, interpretive panels, number of visitors, tourism infrastructure, tour guide service, hostelry and restaurant service. In this method, there are 12 subindicators of MV in total and 15 subindicators of AV, which can take numerical values : 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 (for more details of model see Vujicić et al. 2011). For determining the MV the following formula is used:
The formula that is used to determine the AV is:
Based on the results of quantitative evaluation, a graph is created (Fig. 8), where the MVs are placed on the X-axis and the AVs are placed on the Y-axis. The graph is divided into 9 zones, called Z (i, j), where (i, j = 1,2,3) based on the values they receive from the GAM method. The thickest lines, which create 9 zones, have 4 values for the X-axis, and 5 values for the Y-axis. Passing from zone Z11 to zone Z33, the MV and the AV of geosites increase.
Based on GAM method, a qualitative assessment has been done for each of the geosites of Durres municipality. Table 1 presents the numerical estimation for indicators and subindicators, for each of geosites. Table 2 presents numerical value of MV and AV. Figure 8 presents the position occupied by each geosite in the graph.
Geosite assessment of Durrës municipality, based on the GAM method of Vujicić et al. 2011.
Indicator/Subindicator | Values given by expert (0.00–1.00) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cape of Rodon | St’ Peter beach | Kallmi beach | Rock of Kavaja | Cape of Pali | |
GS 1 | GS 2 | GS 3 | GS 4 | GS 5 | |
Main Values (MV) | |||||
I. Scientific/Educational | |||||
Values ( |
0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
Rarity ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Representativeness ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
Knowledge on geoscientific issues ( |
0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 |
Level of interpretation ( |
0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
II. Scenic/Aesthetic values ( |
|||||
Viewpoint ( |
0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Surface ( |
0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Surrounding landscapes and nature ( |
0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Environmental fitting of sites ( |
1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 |
III. Protection ( |
|||||
Current condition ( |
0.50 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Protection level ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
Vulnerability ( |
0.25 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Suitable number of visitors ( |
0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Additional Values (AV) | |||||
I. Functional Values (VFn) | |||||
Accessibility ( |
0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.75 |
Additional natural values ( |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Additional anthropogenic values ( |
0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Vicinity of emissive centres* ( |
0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Vicinity of important road network ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
Additional functional values ( |
0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
II. Touristic values (VTr) | |||||
Promotion ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Organised visits ( |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Vicinity of visitors centres ( |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Interpretative panels ( |
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Number of visitors ( |
0.50 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Tourism infrastructure ( |
0.25 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Tour guide service ( |
0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Hostelry service ( |
0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Restaurant service ( |
0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Emissive centre is taken as Tirana (the capital of Albania) with the highest number of inhabitant.
Classification of the geosites in different zones based on GAM model.
Geosite | Main Values |
Additional Values |
Zone | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cape of Rodon | GS1 | 2.50 + 2.25 + 2.00 = 6.75 | 2.50 + 4.50 = 7.00 | Z 22 |
St.Pjeter Beach | GS2 | 2.75 + 3.00 + 3.25 = 9.00 | 2.75 + 5.25 = 8.00 | Z 32 |
Kallmi Beach | GS3 | 2.25 + 2.50 + 2.00 = 6.75 | 3.75 + 3.25 = 7.00 | Z 22 |
Rock of Kavaja | GS4 | 2.75 + 2.50 + 2.25 = 7.50 | 2.50 + 3.00 = 5.50 | Z 22 |
Cape of Pali | GS5 | 2.00 + 2.25 + 2.50 = 6.00 | 2.75 + 2.50 = 5.25 | Z 22 |
Progress is made in the qualitative evaluation for each of geosites found in Durrës municipality.
What complements the tourist offer is the presence of the Gate Walls (Porto Romano) along the road to Cape Paul. The surface of the cape enables the participation of many tourists, who have to travel not more than 5 km distance from the city centre of Durrës. The partially flat terrain enables the creation of parking spaces, even for bus type vehicles. To visit the whole cape, one has to walk in an almost natural terrain. It is important to note that, one can observe the bay of Lalëz, the cape of Rodon and the bay of Durrës from the highest point of Paul's cape.
Table 2 illustrated the main and addition values of each of geosites of Durres municipality. From the numerical data, it is observed that St. Peter Beach and Kavaja rock have the highest scientific and educational values. The highest scenic and aesthetic values are found in St. Peter Beach. Also, this geosite has the highest protection values. The geosite with the highest functional values is Kallmi beach.
The highest touristic values are in St. Peter's Beach, which is positioned in zone Z32 of the graph. Cape of Rodon, cape of Pali, Kallmi Beach and Kavaja Rock are positioned in the graphic zone Z22, presenting average MV and AV. Paul's Cape is represented by lower MV and AV. This is due to the lack of legal, institutional, and financial protection, but also because of the lack of infrastructure and services.
The municipality of Durrës is characterised by a complexity of geological and geomorphological features, developed throughout the period of Quaternary. Maritime activity, climatic elements, and tectonic activity enabled the presence of capes, sea beaches and rock masses with scientific, educational, and tourist values. Application of GAM method helped to identify the level of geotourism development. The highest and lowest values of geosites are identified by GAM that promote or prevent the development of geotourism in the future.
The Municipality of Durrës is the second urban centre in Albania (afar the capital, Tirana) and has a high population density that should be educated in geoheritage. Tourist trip to Cape of Rodon, with a focus in natural landscape and cultural objects should be accompanied by education about natural processes. Sun and sand tourism on Kallmi beach, St. Peter beach and Cape of Paul, should be integrated with environmental education. Cape of Paul has scenic, aesthetic and functional values, but the level of industrial pollution is high due to the presence of the biggest fuel port in the country. It is important to promote all geosites regardless of their values.
The municipality of Durrës should create additional functional values (brochures, orientation boards, creation of paths, etc.) by including the geosites in its local management planning.