This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Angelidou M., Psaltoglou A., 2017. An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society 33: 113–125.AngelidouM.PsaltoglouA.2017An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development3311312510.1016/j.scs.2017.05.016Search in Google Scholar
Bock B.B., 2012. Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development. Studies in Agricultural Economics 114 (1316-2016-102759): 57–63.BockB.B.2012Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development114(1316-2016-102759):576310.7896/j.1209Search in Google Scholar
Bock B.B., 2016. Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis 56(4): 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119BockB.B.2016Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection56455257310.1111/soru.12119Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bosworth G., Rizzo F., Marquardt D., Strijker D., Haartsen T., Aagaard Thuesen A., 2016. Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29(4): 442–461.BosworthG.RizzoF.MarquardtD.StrijkerD.HaartsenT.Aagaard ThuesenA.2016Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives29444246110.1080/13511610.2016.1176555Search in Google Scholar
Dax T., Fischer M., 2018. An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline. European Planning Studies 26(2): 297–315.DaxT.FischerM.2018An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline26229731510.1080/09654313.2017.1361596Search in Google Scholar
Dax T., Strahl W., Kirwan J., Maye D., 2016. The LEADER programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(1): 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.DaxT.StrahlW.KirwanJ.MayeD.2016The LEADER programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland231566810.1177/0969776413490425Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Di Iacovo F., Moruzzo R., Rossignoli C., Scarpellini P., 2014. Transition management and social innovation in rural areas: Lessons from social farming. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 20(3): 327–347.Di IacovoF.MoruzzoR.RossignoliC.ScarpelliniP.2014Transition management and social innovation in rural areas: Lessons from social farming20332734710.1080/1389224X.2014.887761Search in Google Scholar
Dobele L., Grinberga-Zalite G., Kelle L., 2015. Sustainable economic development: Scenarios for promotion of social innovation in Latvia. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues 5(2): 149–158. DOI: 10.9770/jssi.2015.5.2(2).DobeleL.Grinberga-ZaliteG.KelleL.2015Sustainable economic development: Scenarios for promotion of social innovation in Latvia5214915810.9770/jssi.2015.5.2(2)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dargan L., Shucksmith M., 2008. LEADER and innovation. Sociologia ruralis 48(3): 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.DarganL.ShucksmithM.2008LEADER and innovation48327429110.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
European Commission 2008. The EU Rural Development Policy: Facing the Challenges. Online: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/fms/pdf/2067BB37-F930-016B-4338-41FC992B5F58.pdf (accessed: 5 November 2019).European Commission2008Online: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/fms/pdf/2067BB37-F930-016B-4338-41FC992B5F58.pdf (accessed: 5 November 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Eurostat 2016. Rural development statistics by urban-rural typology. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Rural_development_statistics_by_urban-rural_typology&oldid=294503 (accessed: 15 November 2019).Eurostat2016Online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Rural_development_statistics_by_urban-rural_typology&oldid=294503 (accessed: 15 November 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Eurostat 2019. Database. Online: ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (accessed: 25 October 2019).Eurostat2019Online: ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (accessed: 25 October 2019).Search in Google Scholar
García-Llorente M., Rossignoli C., Di Iacovo F., Moruzzo R., 2016. Social farming in the promotion of social-ecological sustainability in rural and periurban areas. Sustainability 8(12): 1–15. DOI: 10.3390/su8121238.García-LlorenteM.RossignoliC.Di IacovoF.MoruzzoR.2016Social farming in the promotion of social-ecological sustainability in rural and periurban areas81211510.3390/su8121238Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gobattoni F., Pelorosso R., Leone A., Ripa M.N., 2015. Sustainable rural development: The role of traditional activities in Central Italy. Land Use Policy 48: 412–427.GobattoniF.PelorossoR.LeoneA.RipaM.N.2015Sustainable rural development: The role of traditional activities in Central Italy4841242710.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.013Search in Google Scholar
Hulgard L., Ferreira S., 2019. Social innovation and public policy. In: Howaldt J., Kaletka C., Schröder A., Zirngiebl M. (eds), Atlas of social innovation. 2nd volume – A world of new practices. oekom Verlag GmbH: Munich.HulgardL.FerreiraS.2019Social innovation and public policyIn:HowaldtJ.KaletkaC.SchröderA.ZirngieblM.(eds),oekom Verlag GmbHMunichSearch in Google Scholar
Margaras V., 2019. Demographic trends in EU regions. European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/633160/EPRS_BRI(2019)633160_EN.pdf (accessed: 17 December 2019).MargarasV.2019European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/633160/EPRS_BRI(2019)633160_EN.pdf (accessed: 17 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Marques P., Morgan K., Richardson R., 2018. Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(3): 496–512. DOI: 10.1177/2399654417717986.MarquesP.MorganK.RichardsonR.2018Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept36349651210.1177/2399654417717986Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moulaert F., Sekia F., 2003. Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies 37(3): 289–302. DOI: 10.1080/0034340032000065442.MoulaertF.SekiaF.2003Territorial innovation models: A critical survey37328930210.1080/0034340032000065442Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moulaert F., Martinelli F., Swyngedouw E., Gonzalez S., 2005. Towards alternative model (s) of local innovation. Urban Studies 42(11): 1969–1990. DOI: 10.1080=00420980500279893.MoulaertF.MartinelliF.SwyngedouwE.GonzalezS.2005Towards alternative model (s) of local innovation42111969199010.1080=00420980500279893Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moulaert F., 2010. Social innovation and community development: Concepts, theories and challenges. In: Moulaert F., Swyngedouw E., Martinelli F., Gonzalez S. (eds), Can neighbourhoods save the city? Routledge, Oxford: 20–32.MoulaertF.2010Social innovation and community development: Concepts, theories and challengesIn:MoulaertF.SwyngedouwE.MartinelliF.GonzalezS.(eds),RoutledgeOxford203210.4324/9780203849132Search in Google Scholar
Navarro F., Labianca M., Cejudo E., de Rubertis S., Salento A., Maroto J.C., Belliggiano A., 2018. Interpretations of innovation in rural development. The cases of LEADER Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period. European Countryside 10(1): 107–126. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0007.NavarroF.LabiancaM.CejudoE.de RubertisS.SalentoA.MarotoJ.C.BelliggianoA.2018Interpretations of innovation in rural development. The cases of LEADER Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period10110712610.2478/euco-2018-0007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Neumeier S., 2012. Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1): 48–69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x.NeumeierS.2012Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research521486910.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Neumeier S., 2017. Social innovation in rural development: Identifying the key factors of success. The Geographical Journal 183(1): 34–46. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12180.NeumeierS.2017Social innovation in rural development: Identifying the key factors of success1831344610.1111/geoj.12180Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Noack A., Federwisch T., 2019. Social innovation in rural regions: Urban impulses and cross-border constellations of actors. Sociologia Ruralis 59(1): 92–112. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12216.NoackA.FederwischT.2019Social innovation in rural regions: Urban impulses and cross-border constellations of actors5919211210.1111/soru.12216Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Phillips W., Lee H., Ghobadian A., O’Regan N., James P., 2015. Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management 40(3): 428–461. DOI: 10.1177/1059601114560063.PhillipsW.LeeH.GhobadianA.O’ReganN.JamesP.2015Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review40342846110.1177/1059601114560063Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pol E., Ville S., 2009. Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics 38(6): 878–885.PolE.VilleS.2009Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?38687888510.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011Search in Google Scholar
Ray C., 2006. Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In: Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P. (eds), Handbook of rural studies. SAGE Publications Ltd: 278–291.RayC.2006Neo-endogenous rural development in the EUIn:ClokeP.MarsdenT.MooneyP.(eds),SAGE Publications Ltd27829110.4135/9781848608016.n19Search in Google Scholar
Richter R., 2019. Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural communities with supra-regional networks. Journal of Rural Studies 70: 179–187.RichterR.2019Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural communities with supra-regional networks7017918710.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.005Search in Google Scholar
Statistics Portugal 2019. Database. Online: https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_main (accessed: 18 December 2019).Statistics Portugal2019Online: https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_main (accessed: 18 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Strahl W., Dax T., 2010. Leader mainstreaming – new challenges to innovative local activities. Case study Austria, RuDI report, Work package 8. Vienna, Bundesanstalt fuer Bergbauernfragen: Wien, Austria.StrahlW.DaxT.2010Case study Austria, RuDI report, Work package 8.ViennaBundesanstalt fuer BergbauernfragenWien, AustriaSearch in Google Scholar
Shucksmith M., Cameron S., Merridew T., Pichler F., 2009. Urban–rural differences in quality of life across the European Union. Regional Studies 43(10): 1275–1289.ShucksmithM.CameronS.MerridewT.PichlerF.2009Urban–rural differences in quality of life across the European Union43101275128910.1080/00343400802378750Search in Google Scholar
Schumpeter J.A., 1911. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle, transaction books (1983). New Brunswick/New Jersey.SchumpeterJ.A.1911New Brunswick/New JerseySearch in Google Scholar
Tregear A., Cooper S., 2016. Embeddedness, social capital and learning in rural areas: The case of producer cooperatives. Journal of Rural Studies 44: 101–110.TregearA.CooperS.2016Embeddedness, social capital and learning in rural areas: The case of producer cooperatives4410111010.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.011Search in Google Scholar