Accesso libero

Decision-making tool for a constructive relation between emblematic facilities and urban regeneration projects applied to the case of Riad El Feth Arts Centre in Algiers

Ouafida Bouallag-Azoui
Ouafida Bouallag-Azoui
 e 
Ewa Berezowska-Azzag
Ewa Berezowska-Azzag
   | 26 dic 2019
Quaestiones Geographicae's Cover Image
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Cita
Pubblicato online: 26 dic 2019
Pagine: 107 - 117
Ricevuto: 03 mar 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0044
© 2019 Ouafida Bouallag-Azoui, Ewa Berezowska-Azzag, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Fig. 1

The patio of the Riad El Feth Arts Centre.
The patio of the Riad El Feth Arts Centre.

Fig. 2

Potential dynamics between an object (EF) and the production (urban) system.
Potential dynamics between an object (EF) and the production (urban) system.

Fig. 3

Construction of the EFLUR tool.
Construction of the EFLUR tool.

Fig. 4

Location of Riad El Feth.
Location of Riad El Feth.

Fig. 5

Effects of the Riad El Feth Arts Centre on UR targets.
Effects of the Riad El Feth Arts Centre on UR targets.

Fig. 6

The positive contamination curve for the Riad El Feth.
The positive contamination curve for the Riad El Feth.

Evaluation of Eff (an example).

Eff9IndicatorsScoreWeighting %Eff valueInfluence Index InLeverage effect VEffn/3.5
strengthening safety and securityimproving safety in public spaces1.5501.501.742.61
reducing vulnerability by the creation of new spaces2.525
creation of new urban security services0.525

Components of the structural matrix.

Urban regeneration targetsChecklist of emblematic facility effects (Eff)
1. Integration of municipality development into the met- ropolitan renewal project.

1. Creation of a new pole of attractiveness.

2. Training of a new urban landscape.

2. Enhancement of local attractiveness for better visibility of the city.

3. Development of proximity.

4. Appearance of new nuisances.

3. Close proximity.5. New Urban icon.
4. Permeability of the locality and strengthening of links with the city.

6. New Model of partnership governance.

7. Training of an urban intruder.

5. Repositioning of the locality in the system of territo- ries creating economic values.

8. Promotion of diversity.

9. Strengthening safety.

6. Locality specialisation.10. Promotion of residential attractiveness.
7. Adapting urban planning to the new needs of the modern economy.

11. Initiated gentrification phenomenon.

12. Increase in economic value.

8. Enhancing heritage and recycling of existing build- ings.

13. Revitalisation of the land and real estate market.

14. Promotion of tourist attractiveness.

9. Enhancing cultural diversity.15. Contribution to the territory specialisation.
10. Conserving natural resources and reducing nuisances.16. Green transport.
11. Improving safety and risk management.17. Preservation of resources.
12. Cleanup of the degraded territories.18. Creation or increase of nuisances.
13. Setting up a local tool the RU strategy at the various phases.
14. Creation of establishment to federate all the actors around the RU project.
15. Reconsidering approaches and knowledge for more effective territorial management and greater flexibility.

Rating scale.

ScoreQualitative assessment
0–0.5insignificant
0.5–1.5not very important
1.5–2.5important reference value = 1.5
2.5–3.5very important

Economic and social indicators comparing El Madania to other Sidi M’Hamed municipalities.

MunicipalityArea (ha)PopulationPopulation densityWealth ratioCommercial activity rate% apartments of smallOccupancy
Alger-Centre37075,5419.7822,3104.6632.41.8
Sidi M’hamed21867,87316.5008,6103.1539.42.1
El Mouradia19022,8135.5812,1071.0036.72.0
El Madania21740,3015.9103,0761.0660.02.8
Algiers average12,604.371.7534.62.1
eISSN:
2081-6383
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Geosciences, Geography
Feed RSS della rivista