Accesso libero

The Limit of the Non-dictatorship Index

Pure Mathematics and Applications's Cover Image
Pure Mathematics and Applications
Special issue dedicated to 70th anniversary of prof. Peter Tallos
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

[1] Arrow, K. (1951), Social choice and individual values, Wiley, New York. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Aleskerov, F. and E. Kurbanov (1999), Degree of Manipulability of Social Choice Procedures, in: A. Alkan et.al. (eds.), Current Trends in Economics, Springer, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-662-03750-8_2 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bednay, D., Moskalenko, A. and Tasnádi, A. (2017), Does avoiding bad voting rules lead in good ones? Operations Research Letters, 45, 448-451.10.1016/j.orl.2017.07.001 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bednay, D., Moskalenko, A. and Tasnádi, A. (2019), Dictatorship versus manipulability, Mathematical Social Sciences, 101, 72-76.10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2019.07.001 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Elkind, E., P. Faliszewski and A. Slinko (2015), Distance rationalization of voting rules, Social Choice and Welfare 45, 345-377.10.1007/s00355-015-0892-5 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Farkas, D. and S. Nitzan (1979), The Borda rule and pareto stability: A comment, Econometrica 47, 1305-1306.10.2307/1911965 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gibbard, A. (1973), Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result, Econometrica, 41, 587-601.10.2307/1914083 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kelly, J. (1988), Minimal manipulability and local strategy-proofness, Social Choice and Welfare, 5, 81-85.10.1007/BF00435499 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kelly, J. (1993), Almost all social choice rules are highly manipulable, but few aren’t, Social Choice and Welfare, 10, 161-175.10.1007/BF00183344 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Nitzan, S. (1985), The vulnerability of point-voting schemes to preference variation and strategic manipulation, Public Choice, 47, 349-370.10.1007/BF00127531 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Peleg, B. (1979), A note on manipulability of large voting schemes, Theory and Decision, 11, 401-??412.10.1007/BF00139450 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Satterthwaite, M. (1975), Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions, Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 187-217.10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Slinko, A. (2002) On asymptotic strategy-proofness of classical social choice rules. Theory and Decision 52: 389-398.10.1023/A:1020240214900 Search in Google Scholar