[1. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 1899; 41: 248–264.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod. 1972; 62(3): 296–309.10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Andrews LF, Andrews WA. The six elements of orofacial harmony. Andrews J. 2000; 1: 13–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Qadeer S, et al. Relationship between articulation pa per mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 4(1): 7–12.10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Dr. Jin-Hwan Kim, DDS Article 1. Computerized Occlusal Analysis Utilizing the T-Scan III System.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Julia Cohen-Lévy, Nicolas Cohen. Computerized occlusal analysis in dentofacial orthopedics: indications and clinical use of the T-scan III system. Journal of Dentofacial Anomalies and Orthodontics. Vol. 15, Issue 02, January 2012.10.1051/odfen/2012103]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Baldini, A. Beraldi, A. Nanussi. Importanza clinica della valutazione computerizzata dell'occlusione. DEN TAL CADMOS. 2009, April; 77(4).]Search in Google Scholar
[8. An W, Wang B, Bai Y. Occlusal contacts during pro trusion and lateral movements after orthodontic treat ment. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Za Zhi. 2011 Dec; 29(6): 614–7.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. He Shu-zhen, Li Song, Gao Xiao-hui, An Wei-wei. A preliminary study on the occlusal contact changes du ring retention in adolescent patients. Chinese Journal of Stomatology. 2010; 45(9): 556–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Koos B, Höller J, Schille C, Godt A. Time-depen dent analysis and representation of force distribution and occlusion contact in the masticatory cycle. J Orofac Orthop. 2012 May; 73(3): 204–14.10.1007/s00056-012-0075-2]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Koos B, Godt A, Schille C, Goz G. Precision of an instrumentation-based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch. J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Nov; 71(6): 403–10.10.1007/s00056-010-1023-7]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kerstein RB, Radke J. Masseter and temporalis excur sive hyperactivity decreased by measured anterior guidance development. The Journal of Craniomandibular Practice, Publisher: Chroma, Inc. Audience: Acade mic Format: Magazine/Journal. 2012 Oct; 30(4): 243–54.10.1179/crn.2012.038]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Wang C, Yin X. Occlusal risk factors associated with temporomandibular disorders in young adults with normal occlusions. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Patho. Radiol. 2012 Oct; 114(4): 419–23.10.1016/j.oooo.2011.10.039]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Ciancaglini R, Gherlone E.F., Radaelli G. Association between loss of occlusal support and symptoms of functional disturbances of the masticatory system. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26(3): 248–53.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00368.x]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Conti P.C, et al. A cross-sectional study of preva lence and etiology of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in high school and university students. J Orofac Pain.1996; 10(3): 254–62.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Marklund S, Wanman A. Risk factors associated with incidence and persistence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 Sep; 68(5): 289–99.10.3109/00016357.2010.494621]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kahn J, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Ross ME, Murphy WC. Prevalence of dental occlusal variables and intra-articular temporomandibular disorders: molar relationship, lateral guidance, and nonworking side con tacts. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Oct; 82(4): 410–5.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70027-2]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Akoren AC, Karaagaclioglu L. Comparison of the electromyographic activity of individuals with canine guidance and group function occlusion. J Oral Rehabil. 1995; 22(1): 73–7.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00213.x7897562]Search in Google Scholar