Experimental Study of a Puncture Warning System for a Jack-Up Offshore Platform

1 Kong V, Cassidy MJ, Gaudin C. Failure mechanisms of a spudcan penetrating next to an existing footprint. Theor Appl Mech Lett 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2014.12.001 Search in Google Scholar

2 Jun MJ, Kim YH, Hossain MS, Cassidy MJ, Hu Y, Park SG. Geotechnical centrifuge investigation of the effectiveness of a novel spudcan in easing spudcan-footprint interactions. J Geotech Geoenviron 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002322 Search in Google Scholar

3 Fan LD, Purwana OA, Yuan Y, Duan ML, Gao J. Discrete element method for simulations of the jack-up foundation penetration. Ocean Eng 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113884 Search in Google Scholar

4 Yang XQ, Wang D, Zhang SQ. Probabilistic prediction of spudcan peak penetration resistance based on parameter estimation and sectionalized adaptive linear simplification. Ocean Eng 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117228 Search in Google Scholar

5 Xu J, Zhou Y, Xue QL, Liao QH, Cui GJ, Xie T, Li HY. Research on risk analysis method of jack-up drilling platform pile leg puncture. Chem Tech Fuels Oil 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-023-01519-3 Search in Google Scholar

6 Xie Y, Leung CF, Chow YK. Centrifuge modelling of spudcan-pile interaction in soft clay overlying sand. Geotechnique 2017. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.031 Search in Google Scholar

7 Xie YC, Huang JT, Li XK, Tian XJ, Liu GJ, Leng DX. Experimental study on hydrodynamic characteristics of three truss-type legs of jack-up offshore platform. Ocean Eng 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109305 Search in Google Scholar

8 He R, Kaynia AM, Zhang JS. A poroelastic solution for dynamics of laterally loaded offshore monopoles. Ocean Eng 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.068. Search in Google Scholar

9 Yi JT, Pan YT, Qiu ZZ, Liu F, Zhang XY, Zhang L. The post-installation consolidation settlement of jack-up spudcan foundations in clayey seabed soils. Comput Geotech 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103611 Search in Google Scholar

10 Michalowski RL, Shi L. Bearing capacity of footings over two-layer foundation soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 1995. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:5(421) Search in Google Scholar

11 Wang CX, Carter JP. Deep penetration of strip and circular footings into layered clays. Int J Geomech 2002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2002)2:2(205) Search in Google Scholar

12 Randolph MF, Hossain МS. Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: Centrifuge tests. Geotechnique 2010. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.039 Search in Google Scholar

13 Hossain MS, Randolph MF. Deep-penetrating spudcan foundation on layered clays: Numerical analysis. Geotechnique 2010. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.040 Search in Google Scholar

14 Zhao J, Jang BS, Duan ML, Liang CF. A finite element approach for predicting the full resistance profile of a spudcan deeply penetrating in dense sand overlying clay. Appl Ocean Res 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.03.026 Search in Google Scholar

15 Zhang QY, Liu ZJ. Influence of the spudcan angle on the ultimate bearing capacity of jack-up platform. China Ocean Eng 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-018-0050-9 Search in Google Scholar

16 Zhang QY, Zhang Y, Yan YQ, Liang F. Dynamic analysis of OWT foundation with large diameter monopile under transient storm loading. Ships Offshore Struc 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1861706 Search in Google Scholar

17 Thomas M, Theodosis T. Hydrodynamic loads on a semi-submersible platform supporting a wind turbine under a mooring system with buoys. Pol Marit Res 2024. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0003 Search in Google Scholar

18 Wang W, Fan SM, You YX, Zhao C, Xu LQ, Wang GB, Lu ZQ. Study on the influence of chamfer perforation on heave and pitch of a single floating platform. Pol Marit Res 2023. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2023-0005 Search in Google Scholar

19 Rozmarynowski B, Mikulski T. Selected problems of sensitivity and reliability of a jack-up platform. Pol Marit Res 2018. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0009 Search in Google Scholar

20 Rozmarynowski B. Spectral dynamic analysis of a stationary jack-up platform. Pol Marit Res 2019. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-0005 Search in Google Scholar

21 Rozmarynowski B, Jesien W. Spectral response of stationary jack-up platforms loaded by sea waves and wind using perturbation method. Pol Marit Res 2021. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0049 Search in Google Scholar

22 Ghazi ZM, Abbood IS, Hejazi F. Dynamic evaluation of jack-up platform structure under wave, wind, earthquake and tsunami loads. J Ocean Eng Sci 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2021.04.005 Search in Google Scholar

23 Xu HY, Wang W, Xie YH. Study of the hydrodynamic characteristics of anti-heave devices of wind turbine platforms at different water depths. Pol Marit Res 2024. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0004 Search in Google Scholar

24 Li JL, Xie YH, Wu WG, Zhang C. Analysis of the dynamic response of offshore floating wind power platforms in waves. Pol Marit Res 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-0062 Search in Google Scholar

25 IEC 61010-1: International Electro-technical Commission, Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and laboratory use. 2017 Search in Google Scholar