Economic Analysis and the EEXI Reduction Potential of Parallel Hybrid Dual-Fuel Engine‒Fuel Cell Propulsion Systems for LNG Carriers

1 H. Huang et al., “Inland ship emission inventory and its impact on air quality over the middle Yangtze River, China,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 843, p. 156770, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156770. Search in Google Scholar

2 B. Ryu, P. A. Duong, and H. Kang, “Comparative analysis of the thermodynamic performances of solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine integrated systems for marine vessels using ammonia and hydrogen as fuels,” Int. J. Nav. Arch. Ocean Eng., p. 100524, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2023.100524. Search in Google Scholar

3 N. R. Ammar and I. S. Seddiek, “Hybrid/dual fuel propulsion systems towards decarbonization: Case study container ship,” Ocean Eng., vol. 281, p. 114962, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114962. Search in Google Scholar

4 M. M. Elgohary, I. S. Seddiek, and A. M. Salem, “Overview of alternative fuels with emphasis on the potential of liquefied natural gas as future marine fuel,” Proc. IMechE, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, vol. 229, no. 4, pp. 365-375, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1475090214522778. Search in Google Scholar

5 V. Yalama, O. Yakovleva, V. Trandafilov, and M. Khmelniuk, “Future sustainable maritime sector: Fishing carriers and their adoption to the environmental regulations. Part I,” Pol. Marit. Res., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 69-77, 2022, doi:10.2478/pomr-2022-0027. Search in Google Scholar

6 O. Konur, M. Bayraktar, M. Pamik, B. Kuleyin, and M. Nuran, “The energy efficiency gap in Turkish maritime transportation,” Pol. Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 98-106, 2019, doi:10.2478/pomr-2019-0050. Search in Google Scholar

7 IMO, “Resolution MEPC.254(67). Guidelines on survey and certification of the energy efficiency design index (EEDI). International Maritime Organization,” 2014. Search in Google Scholar

8 IMO, “Energy efficiency of ships, comments received by the correspondence group on possible introduction of EEDI Phase 4, Submitted by Japan. Marine environment protection committee, 75th session agenda item 6,” 2019. Search in Google Scholar

9 IMO, “Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2020: Safe, secure and efficient shipping on clean oceans,” London: International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2020. Search in Google Scholar

10 M. Kalajdžić, M. Vasilev, and N. Momčilović, “Evaluating an inland waterway cargo vessel’s energy efficiency indices,” Pol. Marit. Res., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 27-34, 2022, doi:10.2478/pomr-2022-0014. Search in Google Scholar

11 V. Yalama, O. Yakovleva, V. Trandafilov, and M. Khmelniuk, “Future sustainable maritime sector: Energy efficiency improvement and environmental impact reduction for fishing carriers older than 20 years in the fleet Part II,” Pol. Marit. Res., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 78-88, 2022, doi:10.2478/pomr-2022-0028. Search in Google Scholar

12 M. Bayraktar and O. Yuksel, “A scenario-based assessment of the energy efficiency existing ship index (EEXI) and carbon intensity indicator (CII) regulations,” Ocean Eng., vol. 278, p. 114295, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114295. Search in Google Scholar

13 E. Czermański et al., “Implementation of the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index: An important but costly step towards ocean protection,” Marine Policy, vol. 145, p. 105259, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105259. Search in Google Scholar

14 F. Baldi and A. Coraddu, “Appendix B - Towards halving shipping GHG emissions by 2050: the IMO introduces the CII and the EEXI,” in Sustainable Energy Systems on Ships, F. Baldi, A. Coraddu, and M. E. Mondejar, Eds. Elsevier, 2022, pp. 513-517. Search in Google Scholar

15 A. Farkas, N. Degiuli, I. Martić, and C. G. Grlj, “Is slow steaming a viable option to meet the novel energy efficiency requirements for containerships?” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 374, p. 133915, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133915. Search in Google Scholar

16 M. Schroer, G. Panagakos, and M. B. Barfod, “An evidence-based assessment of IMO’s short-term measures for decarbonizing container shipping,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 363, p. 132441, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132441. Search in Google Scholar

17 H. Wang, Y. Hou, Y. Xiong, and X. Liang, “Research on multi-interval coupling optimization of ship main dimensions for minimum EEDI,” Ocean Eng., vol. 237, p. 109588, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109588. Search in Google Scholar

18 S. E. Damian et al., “Review on the challenges of hybrid propulsion system in marine transport system,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 56, p. 105983, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105983. Search in Google Scholar

19 S. Hyeon, J. Lee, and J. Choi, “Evaluation of fuel gas supply system for marine dual-fuel propulsion engines using LNG and ammonia fuel,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 17, doi: 10.3390/en15176303. Search in Google Scholar

20 Á. Benet, A. Villalba-Herreros, R. d’Amore-Domenech, and T. J. Leo, “Knowledge gaps in fuel cell-based maritime hybrid power plants and alternative fuels,” J. Power Sources, vol. 548, p. 232066, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232066. Search in Google Scholar

21 J. Ahn, S. H. Park, S. Lee, Y. Noh, and D. Chang, “Molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC)-based hybrid propulsion systems for a liquefied hydrogen tanker,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., vol. 43, no. 15, pp. 7525-7537, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.015. Search in Google Scholar

22 L. van Biert and K. Visser, “Chapter 3 - Fuel cells systems for sustainable ships,” in Sustainable Energy Systems on Ships, F. Baldi, A. Coraddu, and M. E. Mondejar, Eds. Elsevier, 2022, pp. 81-121. Search in Google Scholar

23 S. A. Korkmaz, K. E. Erginer, O. Yuksel, O. Konur, and C. O. Colpan, “Environmental and economic analyses of fuel cell and battery-based hybrid systems utilized as auxiliary power units on a chemical tanker vessel,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.320. Search in Google Scholar

24 Z. Chen, Y. Chen, W. Wang, K. Lu, H. Yang, and W. Zhu, “Failure pressure analysis of hydrogen storage pipeline under low temperature and high pressure,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., vol. 45, no. 43, pp. 23142-23150, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.129. Search in Google Scholar

25 Y. Rong et al., “Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen storage and transportation from hydrogen plant to terminal refueling station,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.187. Search in Google Scholar

26 A. Farsi and M. A. Rosen, “PEM fuel cell-assisted lithium ion battery electric vehicle integrated with an air-based thermal management system,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., vol. 47, no. 84, pp. 35810-35824, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.153. Search in Google Scholar

27 A. Pramuanjaroenkij and S. Kakaç, “The fuel cell electric vehicles: The highlight review,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., vol. 48, no. 25, pp. 9401-9425, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.103. Search in Google Scholar

28 A. S. Mohammed, S. M. Atnaw, A. O. Salau, and J. N. Eneh, “Review of optimal sizing and power management strategies for fuel cell/battery/super capacitor hybrid electric vehicles,” Energy Reports, vol. 9, pp. 2213-2228, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.042. Search in Google Scholar

29 Marine Traffic, “MOZAH, LNG TankerLNG Tanker IMO: 9337755,” https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ships/shipid:712524/mmsi:538003212/imo:9337755/vessel:MOZAH (accessed 25 March 2023. Search in Google Scholar

30 Vessel tracking, “MOZAH (IMO 9337755) - LNG Tanker,” https://www.vesseltracking.net/ship/mozah-9337755 (accessed 25 March 2023. Search in Google Scholar

31 M. S. Khan et al., “Graphical approach for estimating and minimizing boil-off gas and compression energy consumption in LNG regasification terminals,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 101, p. 104539, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104539. Search in Google Scholar

32 Qatar Energy, “Ports Info rmation,” https://www.qatarenergy.qa/en/MarketingAndTrading/Pages/PortsInformation.aspx (accessed 3 March 2023. Search in Google Scholar

33 Statista, “Distribution of liquefied natural gas imported into India in 2021, by country of origin,” https://www.statista.com/statistics/1237488/lng-import-share-india-by-country/#:~:text=India’s%20primary%20supplier%20of%20liquefied,world’s%20fourth%2Dlargest%20LNG%20importer (accessed 2 March 2023. Search in Google Scholar

34 Ballard, “Fuel cell power module for marine applications,” https://www.ballard.com/docs/default-source/spec-sheets/fcwavetm-specification-sheet.pdf?sfvrsn=6e44dd80_12 (accessed 2 February 2023. Search in Google Scholar

35 M. Cavo, E. Gadducci, D. Rattazzi, M. Rivarolo, and L. Magistri, “Dynamic analysis of PEM fuel cells and metal hydrides on a zero-emission ship: A model-based approach,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., vol. 46, no. 64, pp. 32630-32644, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.104. Search in Google Scholar

36 S. Dirkes, J. Leidig, P. Fisch, and S. Pischinger, “Prescriptive lifetime management for PEM fuel cell systems in transportation applications, Part I: State of the art and conceptual design,” Energ. Convers. Manage., vol. 277, p. 116598, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116598. Search in Google Scholar

37 Y. Wang and L. A. Wright, “A comparative review of alternative fuels for the maritime sector: Economic, technology, and policy challenges for clean energy implementation,” World, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 456-481, 2021, doi: 10.3390/world2040029. Search in Google Scholar

38 R. Jing et al., “Economic and environmental multi-optimal design and dispatch of solid oxide fuel cell based CCHP system,” Energ. Convers. Manage., vol. 154, pp. 365-379, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.035. Search in Google Scholar

39 H. Xing, C. Stuart, S. Spence, and H. Chen, “Fuel cell power systems for maritime applications: Progress and perspectives,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13031213. Search in Google Scholar

40 X. Tian, W. Jiao, L. Ren, S. Liu, and T. Liu, “Research on climate zoning indicators for operating environment of liquefied natural gas ambient air vaporizer,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 60, p. 102186, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102186. Search in Google Scholar

41 M. Sermsuk, Y. Sukjai, M. Wiboonrat, and K. Kiatkittipong, “Feasibility study of a combined system of electricity generation and cooling from liquefied natural gas to reduce the electricity cost of data centres,” Energy, vol. 254, p. 124397, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124397. Search in Google Scholar

42 Y. Li and H. Luo, “Integration of light hydrocarbons cryogenic separation process in refinery based on LNG cold energy utilization,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 93, pp. 632-639, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.04.009. Search in Google Scholar

43 N. T. Stetson and R. C. Bowman, “ Fuel cell system cost. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record,” 2016. Search in Google Scholar

44 R. E. Ciez and J. F. Whitacre, “Comparison between cylindrical and prismatic lithium-ion cell costs using a process based cost model,” J. Power Sources, vol. 340, pp. 273-281, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.054. Search in Google Scholar

45 M. S. Peters, K. D. Timmerhaus, and R. E. West, Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. McGraw-Hill, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

46 MAN, “Hydrogen in shipping, MAN Energy Solutions,” https://www.man-es.com/campaigns/download-Q2-2023/Download/hydrogen-in-shipping/faffa612-4edc-4a2aa5f9-df89c632a431/Future-Fuels-Hydrogen (accessed 30 March 2023). Search in Google Scholar

47 EIA, US Energy Information Administration, Natural Gas Statistics, https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdD.htm (accessed 30 January 2023. Search in Google Scholar

48 IMO, Guidelines on the method of calculation of the attained Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI). Resolution MEPC.333(76), https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.333(76).pdf (accessed 10 May 2023. Search in Google Scholar

49 ABS, “Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI),” https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/regulatory-news/2022/ABS%20Regulatory%20News%20-%20EEXI.pdf (accessed 10 May 2023. Search in Google Scholar

50 IACS, “EEXI Implementation Guidelines,” https://iacs.org.uk/download/14308 (accessed 10 May 2023. Search in Google Scholar

51 IMO, “Report of the marine environment protection committee on its sixty-second session,” http://www.crs.hr/Portals/0/MEPC%2062-24.pdf (accessed 27 October 2018). Search in Google Scholar

52 J. Ahn, H. You, J. Ryu, and D. Chang, “Strategy for selecting an optimal propulsion system of a liquefied hydrogen tanker,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 5366-5380, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.037. Search in Google Scholar

53 N. R. Ammar, “Environmental and cost-effectiveness comparison of dual fuel propulsion options for emissions reduction onboard LNG carriers,” Brodogradnja/Shipbuilding, vol. 70(3), no. 3, pp. 61-77, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/221116. Search in Google Scholar

54 D. Dobrota, B. Lalić, and I. Komar, “Problem of boil-off in LNG supply chain,” Transactions on Maritime Science, vol. 2, pp. 91-100, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

55 J. Blazquez, R. Fuentes, and B. Manzano, “On some economic principles of the energy transition,” Energy Policy, vol. 147, p. 111807, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111807. Search in Google Scholar

56 D. Lukić et al., “Manufacturing cost estimation in the conceptual process planning,” Machine Design, vol. 8, pp. 83-90, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

57 Ihsan, “The analysis of the effect of indirect costs on the performance of construction project implementation,” Jurnal PenSil, vol. 12, pp. 100-119, 2023, doi: 10.21009/jpensil.v12i1.30978. Search in Google Scholar

58 N. R. Ammar and I. S. Seddiek, “An environmental and economic analysis of emission reduction strategies for container ships with emphasis on the improved energy efficiency indexes,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 23342-23355, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08861-7. Search in Google Scholar

59 N. R. Ammar and I. S. Seddiek, “Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., vol. 28, no. 28, pp. 37851-37866, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13271-4. Search in Google Scholar

60 P. Thoft-Christensen, “Infrastructures and life-cycle cost-benefit analysis,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 507-516, 2012, doi: 10.1080/15732479.2010.539070. Search in Google Scholar