Accesso libero

Modelling of Ship’s Trajectory Planning in Collision Situations by Hybrid Genetic Algorithm

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

1. Bazarra M.S., Shetty L.M.: Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp. 1-360.Search in Google Scholar

2. Benjamin M. R., Curcio J. A.: COLREGS-based navigation of autonomous marine vehicles. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles IEEE/OES. IEEE, 2004, pp. 32-39.10.1109/AUV.2004.1431190Search in Google Scholar

3. Burmeister, H.C., Bruhn W. and Porathe T.: Autonomous unmanned merchant vessel and its contribution towards the e-navigation implementation. the MUNIN perspective. Ocean Engineering. 1, 2014, pp. 1-13.10.1016/j.enavi.2014.12.002Search in Google Scholar

4. Goldberg D.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989Search in Google Scholar

5. Hong X., Harris C. J., Wilson P. A.: Autonomous ship collision free trajectory navigation and control algorithms. Proceedings of 7th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 1999, pp. 923–929.Search in Google Scholar

6. Hwang C. N., Yang J. M., Chiang C. Y.: The design of fuzzy collision-avoidance expert system implemented by H (subscript∞)-autopilot. Journal of Marine Science and technology, 9(1), 2001, pp. 25-37.10.51400/2709-6998.2432Search in Google Scholar

7. Hwang C.N.: The integrated design of fuzzy collision-avoidance and h1-autopilots on ships. The Journal of Navigation, 55 (1), 2002, pp.117–136.10.1017/S0373463301001631Search in Google Scholar

8. Ito M., Zhang F. and Yoshida N.: Collision avoidance control of ship with genetic algorithm. Proceedings of 1999 IOOO international conference on control applications, 1999. pp. 1791-1796.Search in Google Scholar

9. Jokioinen E.: Remote and autonomous ships: the next steps. www.rolls-royce.com/marine, 2016Search in Google Scholar

10. Lazarowska A.: Ship’s trajectory planning for collision avoidance at sea based on ant colony optimization. Journal of Navigation, 68(2), 2015, pp. 291-307.10.1017/S0373463314000708Search in Google Scholar

11. Lee Y., Kim Y. G.: A collision avoidance system for autonomous ship using fuzzy relational products and COLREGs. Proceedings of Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning–IDEAL: 5th International Conference, Exeter, UK. 25–27 August, 2004, pp. 247-252.10.1007/978-3-540-28651-6_36Search in Google Scholar

12. Li, L.N., Yang S.H., Cao B.G. and Li, Z.F.: A summary of studies on the automation of ship Collision Avoidance Intelligence. Journal of Jimei University, China, 11(2), 2006, pp. 199-192.Search in Google Scholar

13. Liu, Y., Bucknall R.: Path planning algorithm for unmanned surface vehicle formations in a practical maritime environment. Ocean Engineering, 97, 2015, pp. 126–144.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.008Search in Google Scholar

14. Miele, A., Wang T., Chao C. S., et al.: Optimal control of a ship for collision avoidance maneuvers. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 103(3), 1999, pp. 495–519.10.1023/A:1021775722287Search in Google Scholar

15. Perera L. P., Carvalho J. P., Soares C. G.: Fuzzy logic based decision making system for collision avoidance of ocean navigation under critical collision conditions. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 16(1), 2011, pp. 84-99.10.1007/s00773-010-0106-xSearch in Google Scholar

16. Perera L. P., Carvalho J. P., Soares C. G.: Intelligent ocean navigation and fuzzy-bayesian decision action formulation. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 37(2), 2012, pp. 204-219.10.1109/JOE.2012.2184949Search in Google Scholar

17. Smierzchalski R.: Evolutionary trajectory planning of ships in navigation traffic areas. Journal of Marine Science and Technology. 4(1), 1999, pp. 1-6.10.1007/s007730050001Search in Google Scholar

18. Statheros T., Howells G. and McDonald-Maier K.: Autonomous ship collision avoidance navigation concepts, technologies and techniques. Journal of Navigation, 61, 2008, pp. 129-142.10.1017/S037346330700447XSearch in Google Scholar

19. Sun L. C.: The Model of close quarter situation. Proceedings of 96’ANTI-COLLISION, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

20. Szlapczynski, R.: A unified measure of collision risk derived from the concept of a ship domain. Journal of Navigation. 59, 2006, pp. 477-490.10.1017/S0373463306003833Search in Google Scholar

21. Szlapczynski, R.. A new method of ship routing on raster grids, with turn penalties and collision avoidance. Journal of Navigation, 59(1), 2006, pp. 27–42.10.1017/S0373463305003528Search in Google Scholar

22. Szlapczynski, R.: Evolutionary sets of safe ship trajectories: a new approach to collision avoidance. Journal of Navigation, 64(1), 2011, pp.169-181.10.1017/S0373463310000238Search in Google Scholar

23. Szlapczynski R., Szlapczynska J.: On evolutionary computing in multi-ship trajectory planning. Applied Intelligence, 37(2), 2012, pp. 155-174.10.1007/s10489-011-0319-7Search in Google Scholar

24. Szlapczynski R., Szlapczynska J.: Customized crossover in evolutionary sets of safe ship trajectories. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 22(4), 2012, pp. 999-1009.10.2478/v10006-012-0074-xSearch in Google Scholar

25. Szłapczynski R.: Evolutionary sets of safe ship trajectories with speed reduction manoeuvres within traffic separation schemes. Polish Maritime Research, 21(1), 2014, pp. 20-27.10.2478/pomr-2014-0004Search in Google Scholar

26. Tam C., Bucknall R., Greig A.: Review of collision avoidance and path planning methods for ships in close range encounters. Journal of Navigation. 62, 2009, pp. 455-476.10.1017/S0373463308005134Search in Google Scholar

27. Tam C., Bucknall R.: Collision risk assessment for ships. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 15, 2010, pp. 257-270.10.1007/s00773-010-0089-7Search in Google Scholar

28. Tam C. K., Bucknall R.: Path-planning algorithm for ships in close-range encounters. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 15(4), 2010, pp. 395-407.10.1007/s00773-010-0094-xSearch in Google Scholar

29. Tam C. K., Bucknall R.: Cooperative path planning algorithm for marine surface vessels. Ocean Engineering, 57, 2013, pp. 25–33.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.09.003Search in Google Scholar

30. Tsou M.C., Hsueh C.K.: The study of ship collision avoidance route planning by ant colony algorithm. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2010, 18(5), 2010, pp. 746-756.10.51400/2709-6998.1929Search in Google Scholar

31. Tsou, M. C., Kao S. L., Su C. M.: Decision support from genetic algorithms for ship collision avoidance route planning and alerts. Journal of Navigation, 63(1), 2010, pp. 167–182.10.1017/S037346330999021XSearch in Google Scholar

32. Tsou M.C.: Multi-target collision avoidance route planning under an ECDIS framework. Ocean Engineering. 121, 2016, pp. 268-278.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.05.040Search in Google Scholar

33. Xu Q. Y.: Collision avoidance strategy optimization based on danger immune algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 76, 2014, pp. 268-279.10.1016/j.cie.2014.08.010Search in Google Scholar

34. Xue Y., Clelland D., Lee B. S., et al.: Automatic simulation of ship navigation. Ocean Engineering, 38(17), 2011, pp. 2290–2305.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.10.011Search in Google Scholar

35. Zhang J, F., Zhang D., Yan X., et al.: A distributed anti-collision decision support formulation in multi-ship encounter situations under COLREGs. Ocean Engineering, 105, 2015, pp. 336-348.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.054Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-7429
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Engineering, Introductions and Overviews, other, Geosciences, Atmospheric Science and Climatology, Life Sciences