Accesso libero

Stance-taking in Spanish-speaking Preschoolers’ Argumentative Interaction

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Berman, R. (2004). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route to language acquisition. In R. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp. 9–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.3.05berSearch in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S., & Snow, C. (2004). Introduction: The potential of peer-talk. Discourse Studies, 6(3), 291–306.10.1177/1461445604044290Search in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S., Huck-Taglicht, D., & Avni, H. (2004). The social and discursive spectrum of peer talk. Discourse Studies, 6(3), 307–328.10.1177/1461445604044291Search in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S., Hamo, M., & Habib, T. (2010). Explanations in naturally occurring peer talk: Conversational emergence and function, thematic scope, and contribution to the development of discursive skills. First Language, 30(3–4), 440–460.10.1177/0142723710370528Search in Google Scholar

Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C.-S., & Haynes, O. M. (2004). Specific and general language performance across early childhood: stability and gender considerations. First Language, 24, 267–304.10.1177/0142723704045681Search in Google Scholar

Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Investigating children’s why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713-734.10.1177/1461445613490013Search in Google Scholar

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Burdelski, M. (2010). Socializing politeness routines: Action, other-orientation, and embodiment in a Japanese preschool. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1606–1621.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing, (pp. 261–272). In W. Chafe and J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Cobb-Moore, C., Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2009). Young children as rule markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1477–1492.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013Search in Google Scholar

Dersley, I., & Wootton, A. J. (2000). Observations about complaint sequences within antagonistic arguments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 375–406.10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02Search in Google Scholar

Dersley, I., & Wootton, A. J (2001). In the heat of the sequence: Interactional features preceding walkouts from argumentative talk. Language in Society, 30, 611–638.10.1017/S0047404501004043Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, J. (2007). The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (Ed.). Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar

Dunn, J., & Munn, P. (1987). Development of justification in disputes with mother and siblings. Developmental Psychology, 23(6), 791–798.10.1037/0012-1649.23.6.791Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, A. (1987). Learning to argue with parents and peers. Argumentation, 1(2), 113–125.10.1007/BF00182256Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, A. (1992). Conflicts between mothers and their young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(1), 21–43.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, A., & Garvey, C. (1981). Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4, 149–170.10.1080/01638538109544512Search in Google Scholar

Goetz, P. J. (2010). The development of verbal justifications in the conversations of preschool children and adults. First Language, 30(3-4), 403–420.10.1177/0142723710370522Search in Google Scholar

Goetz, P. J., & Shatz, M. (1999). When and how peers give reasons: justifications in the talk of middle-school children. Journal of Child Language, 26, 721–48.10.1017/S0305000999003980Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2006). Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. Text & Talk, 26(4-5), 443–461.10.1515/TEXT.2006.018Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1990). Interstitial argument. In A. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk (pp. 85–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children’s arguing. In S. U. Philips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language. Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 200–248). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011Search in Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.10.1017/S0140525X0999152XSearch in Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M. L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1–29.10.1017/S0047404500017656Search in Google Scholar

Köymen, B., Rosenbaum, L., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Reasoning during joint decision-making by preschool peers. Cognitive Development, 32, 74–85.10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Köymen, B., Schmidt, M., Rost, L., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Teaching versus enforcing game rules in peer interactions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 135, 93–101.10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Küntay, A., Nakamura, K., & Sen, B. A. (2014). Crosslinguistic and crosscultural approaches to pragmatic development. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition, (pp. 317–342). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.10.18kunSearch in Google Scholar

Kyratzis, A., Ross, T. S., & Köymen, B. S. (2010). Validating justifications in preschool girls’ and boys’ friendship group talk: implications for linguistic and socio-cognitive development. Journal of Child Language, 37(1), 115–144.10.1017/S0305000908009069Search in Google Scholar

Leitão. S. (2007). Argumentação e desenvolvimento do pensamento reflexivo. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 20(3), 454–462.10.1590/S0102-79722007000300013Search in Google Scholar

Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.3Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Volume I: Transcription format and programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.1162/coli.2000.26.4.657Search in Google Scholar

Matsui, T. (2014). Children’s understanding of certainty and evidentiality. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition, (pp. 295–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.10.17matSearch in Google Scholar

Maynard, D. W. (1985). How children start arguments. Language in Society, 14, 1–30.10.1017/S0047404500010915Search in Google Scholar

Migdalek, M. J., & Rosemberg, C. R. (2013). Construcción multimodal de los argumentos de niños pequeños en disputas durante situaciones de juego. Papeles de Trabajo sobre Cultura, Educación y Desarrollo Humano, 9(4), 1–16.Search in Google Scholar

Migdalek, M.J, Rosemberg, C. R. & Arrúe, J. E. (2015). Argumentación infantil en situaciones de juego: diferencias en función del contexto. Propuesta Educativa, 44(2), 79–88.Search in Google Scholar

Migdalek, M. J., Rosemberg, C. R., & Santibáñez Yáñez, C. (2014a). La génesis de la argumentación. Un estudio con niños de 3 a 5 años en distintos contextos de juego. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 19(3), 251–267.10.17533/udea.ikala.v19n3a03Search in Google Scholar

Migdalek, M. J., Santibáñez Yáñez, C., & Rosemberg, C. R. (2014b). Estrategias argumentativas en niños pequeños: Un estudio a partir de las disputas durante el juego en contextos escolares. Revista Signos, 47(86), 435–462.10.4067/S0718-09342014000300005Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development. The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174619Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press10.4159/9780674041400Search in Google Scholar

Ninio, A., & Snow, C. (1996). Pragmatic development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, E. (1986). Introduction. In B. B. Schieffelin, E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures, (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620898.001Search in Google Scholar

Peronard, M. (1991). Antecedentes ontogenéticos de la argumentación. In E. L. Traill (Eds.), Scripta philologica: in honorem Juan M. Lope Blanch, 3 (pp. 417–443). México: UNAM.Search in Google Scholar

Phinney, J. S. (1986). The structure of 5-year-olds’ verbal quarrels with peers and siblings. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147(1), 47–60.10.1080/00221325.1986.9914479Search in Google Scholar

Rosemberg, C. R, Arrúe J. E., & Alam, F. (2005-2012). Home language environments of 4-year old Argentinean children from different socio-cultural groups. Buenos Aires: CONICET.Search in Google Scholar

Rosemberg, C. R., Silva, M. L., & Stein, A. (2011). Narrativas infantiles en contexto: un estudio en hogares de barrios urbano marginados de Buenos Aires. Revista del Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación Universidad de Buenos Aires, 28, 135–154.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff. E. A., & Jefferson G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–73510.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development, (pp.51–77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Shantz, C. U. (1987). Conflicts between children. Child Development, 58, 283–305.10.2307/1130507Search in Google Scholar

Shiro, M. (2003). Genre and evaluation in narrative development. Journal of Child Language, 30(1), 165–194.10.1017/S0305000902005500Search in Google Scholar

Shiro, M. (2004). Expressions of epistemic modality and construction of narrative stance in Venezuelan children’s narratives. Psychology of Language and Communication, 8(2), 35–56.Search in Google Scholar

Shiro, M. (2007). La construcción del punto de vista en los relatos orales de niños en edad escolar: un análisis discursivo de la modalidad. Caracas: UCV.Search in Google Scholar

Shiro, M. (2008). Narrative stance in Venezuelan children’s stories. In A. McCabe, A. Imbaley, & G. Melzi (Eds.), Spanish language narration and literacy: Culture, cognition and emotion, (pp. 213–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815669.012Search in Google Scholar

Shiro, M. (2012). “Y entonces le dijo….“ Representación del habla en las narraciones orales de niños venezolanos. Boletín de Lingüística, 37-38, 119–143.Search in Google Scholar

Sprott, R. A. (1992). On giving reasons in verbal disputes: The development of justifying. Argumentation & Advocacy, 29(2), 61–76.10.1080/00028533.1992.11951556Search in Google Scholar

Stein, N., & Albro, E. R. (2001). The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation. Discourse Processes, 32(2-3), 113–133.10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_02Search in Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840005Search in Google Scholar

Watts. R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615184Search in Google Scholar

Zadunaisky Ehrlich, S., & Blum-Kulka, S. (2010). Peer talk as a ‘double opportunity space’: The case of argumentative discourse. Discourse & Society, 21(2), 211–233.10.1177/0957926509353847Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology