[Apperly, I. (2013). Can theory of mind grow up? Mindreading in adults, and its implications for the development and neuroscience of mindreading. In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H. & Lombardo, M. (Eds.) Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 72–92). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Apperly, I. A. & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological review, 116(4), 953.10.1037/a0016923]Search in Google Scholar
[Astington, J. W. (1993). The child’s discovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baillargeon, R., Buttelmann, D., & Southgate, V. (2018). Invited commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological and theoretical considerations. Cognitive Development, 46, 112–124.10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, S. T., Leslie, A. M., Gallistel, C. R., & Hood, B. M. (2016). Bayesian change-point analysis reveals developmental change in a classic theory of mind task. Cognitive psychology, 91, 124–149.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.08.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Nijhof, A., Wiersema, J. R., & Brass, M. (2016). Brain activation for spontaneous and explicit false belief tasks overlaps: new fMRI evidence on belief processing and violation of expectation. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12(3), 391–400.10.1093/scan/nsw143]Search in Google Scholar
[Bardi, L., Six, P., & Brass, M. (2017). Repetitive TMS of the temporo-parietal junction disrupts participant’s expectations in a spontaneous Theory of Mind task. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12(11), 1775–1782.10.1093/scan/nsx109]Search in Google Scholar
[Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30(2), 285–297.10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00241.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?. Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Benson, J. E., Sabbagh, M. A., Carlson, S. M., & Zelazo, P. D. (2013). Individual differences in executive functioning predict preschoolers’ improvement from theory-of-mind training. Developmental Psychology, 49(9), 1615.10.1037/a0031056]Search in Google Scholar
[Birch, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2003). Children are cursed: An asymmetric bias in mental-state attribution. Psychological Science, 14(3), 283–286.10.1111/1467-9280.03436]Search in Google Scholar
[Birch, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false-beliefs. Psychological Science, 18(5), 382–386.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01909.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Biro, S., Csibra, G., Koos, O, & Gergely, G. (1998). Understanding rational action in infancy. Psychology of Language and Communication, 1(2), 29–38. Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false-belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77(1), B25–B31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buttelmann, D., Buttelmann, F., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2017). Great apes distinguish true from false-beliefs in an interactive helping task. PLoS one, 12(4), e0173793.10.1371/journal.pone.0173793]Search in Google Scholar
[Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Eighteen-month-old infants show false-belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition, 112(2), 337–342.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Buttelmann, D., Over, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Eighteen-month-olds understand false-beliefs in an unexpected-contents task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 120–126.10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Buttelmann, F., Suhrke, J., & Buttelmann, D. (2015). What you get is what you believe: Eighteen-month-olds demonstrate belief understanding in an unexpected-identity task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 94–103.10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Carruthers, P. (2017). Mindreading in adults: evaluating two-systems views. Synthese, 194(3), 673–688.10.1007/s11229-015-0792-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Carter, C. S., & Van Veen, V. (2007). Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 367-379.10.3758/CABN.7.4.367]Search in Google Scholar
[Charman, T., Swettenham, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Baird, G., & Drew, A. (1997). Infants with autism: An investigation of empathy, pretend play, joint attention, and imitation. Developmental Psychology, 33(5), 781.10.1037/0012-1649.33.5.781]Search in Google Scholar
[Clements, W. A., & Perner, J. (1994). Implicit understanding of belief. Cognitive Development, 9(4), 377–395.10.1016/0885-2014(94)90012-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (1998). The teleological origins of mentalistic action explanations: A developmental hypothesis. Developmental Science, 1(2), 255–259.10.1111/1467-7687.00039]Search in Google Scholar
[Dennett, D. C. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs [P&W, SR&B]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 568–570.10.1017/S0140525X00076664]Search in Google Scholar
[de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (2000). Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false. Children’s Reasoning and the Mind (Eds.), P. Mitchell and K. Riggs (Hove: Psychology Press), 191–228.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Villiers, J. G., & Pyers, J. E. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17(1), 1037–1060.10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00073-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2014). Relations between false-belief understanding and executive function in early childhood: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 85(5), 1777–1794.10.1111/cdev.12237]Search in Google Scholar
[Drayton, L. A., & Santos, L. R. (2018). What do monkeys know about others’ knowledge?. Cognition, 170, 201–208.10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Farrar, M. J., Benigno, J. P., Tompkins, V., & Gage, N. A. (2017). Are there different pathways to explicit false-belief understanding? General language and complementation in typical and atypical children. Cognitive Development, 43, 49–66.10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.02.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Flavell, J. H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective-taking. Piaget’s theory: Prospects and possibilities. (pp. 107–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum]Search in Google Scholar
[Flavell, J. H. (1993). The development of children’s understanding of false-belief and the appearance-reality distinction. International Journal of Psychology, 28(5), 595–604.10.1080/00207599308246944]Search in Google Scholar
[Fletcher, P. C., Happe, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition, 57(2), 109–128.10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-R]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 77–83.10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallagher, S., & Povinelli, D. J. (2012). Enactive and behavioral abstraction accounts of social understanding in chimpanzees, infants, and adults. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(1), 145–169.10.1007/s13164-012-0093-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Bíró, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56(2), 165–193.10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-H]Search in Google Scholar
[Grosse Wiesmann, C., Friederici, A. D., Disla, D., Steinbeis, N., & Singer, T. (2018). Longitudinal evidence for 4-year-olds’ but not 2-and 3-year-olds’ false-belief-related action anticipation. Cognitive Development, 46, 58–68.10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Grosse Wiesmann, C., Friederici, A. D., Singer, T., & Steinbeis, N. (2017). Implicit and explicit false-belief development in preschool children. Developmental Science, 20(5).]Search in Google Scholar
[Grosse Wiesmann, C., Schreiber, J., Singer, T., Steinbeis, N., & Friederici, A. D. (2017). White matter maturation is associated with the emergence of theory of mind in early childhood. Nature Communications, 8, 14692.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gut, A., Haman, M. & Gorbaniuk, O. (under review) The development of understanding opacity in preschoolers: A transition from a coarse- to fine-grained understanding of beliefs.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gweon, H., Dodell-Feder, D., Bedny, M., & Saxe, R. (2012). Theory of mind performance in children correlates with functional specialization of a brain region for thinking about thoughts. Child development, 83(6), 1853–1868.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01829.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Helming, K. A., Strickland, B., & Jacob, P. (2014). Making sense of early false-belief understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 167–170.10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Helming, K. A., Strickland, B., & Jacob, P. (2016). Solving the puzzle about early belief-ascription. Mind & Language, 31(4), 438–469.10.1111/mila.12114]Search in Google Scholar
[Henry, J. D., Phillips, L. H., Ruffman, T., & Bailey, P. E. (2013). A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. Psychology and Aging, 28(3), 826.10.1037/a0030677]Search in Google Scholar
[Heyes, C. (2014a). False-belief in infancy: a fresh look. Developmental Science, 17(5), 647–659.10.1111/desc.12148]Search in Google Scholar
[Heyes, C. (2014b). Submentalizing: I am not really reading your mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 131–143.10.1177/1745691613518076]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoehl, S., Wiese, L., & Striano, T. (2008). Young infants’ neural processing of objects is affected by eye gaze direction and emotional expression. PLoS One, 3(6), e2389.10.1371/journal.pone.0002389]Search in Google Scholar
[Hood, B. M., Willen, J. D., & Driver, J. (1998). Adult’s eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychological Science, 9(2), 131–134.10.1111/1467-9280.00024]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, C., & Leekam, S. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13(4), 590–619.10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00285.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyde, D. C., Aparicio Betancourt, M., & Simon, C. E. (2015). Human temporal- parietal junction spontaneously tracks others' beliefs: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Human Brain Mapping, 36(12), 4831–4846.10.1002/hbm.22953]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyde, D. C., Simon, C. E., Ting, F., & Nikolaeva, J. I. (2018). Functional Organization of the Temporal–Parietal Junction for Theory of Mind in Preverbal Infants: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(18), 4264–4274.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0264-17.2018]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacoby, N., Bruneau, E., Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2016). Localizing pain matrix and theory of mind networks with both verbal and non-verbal stimuli. NeuroImage, 126, 39–48.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (2000). Theory of mind and social behavior: Causal models tested in a longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 203–220.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kampis, D., Fogd, D., & Kovács, Á. M. (2017). Nonverbal components of Theory of Mind in typical and atypical development. Infant Behavior and Development, 48, 54–62.10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovács, Á. M., Kühn, S., Gergely, G., Csibra, G., & Brass, M. (2014). Are all beliefs equal? Implicit belief attributions recruiting core brain regions of theory of mind. PloS one, 9(9), e106558.10.1371/journal.pone.0106558]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A. D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330(6012), 1830–1834.]Search in Google Scholar
[El Kaddouri, R., Bardi, L., De Bremaeker, D., Brass, M., & Wiersema, J. R. (2019). Measuring spontaneous mentalizing with a ball detection task: putting the attention-check hypothesis by Phillips and colleagues (2015) to the test. Psychological Research, 1–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false-beliefs. Science, 354(6308), 110–114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2017). A test of the submentalizing hypothesis: Apes’ performance in a false-belief task inanimate control. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 10(4), e1343771.10.1080/19420889.2017.1343771]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.) Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 301–326). Hove: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kulke, L., & Rakoczy, H. (2018). Implicit theory of mind – An overview of current replications and non-replications. Data in Brief, 16, 101–104.10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Kulke, L., Reiß, M., Krist, H., & Rakoczy, H. (2018). How robust are anticipatory looking measures of theory of mind? Replication attempts across the life span. Cognitive Development, 46, 97–111.10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.09.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kulke, L., von Duhn, B., Schneider, D., & Rakoczy, H. (2018). Is implicit theory of mind a real and robust phenomenon? Results from a systematic replication study. Psychological Science, 0956797617747090.10.1177/0956797617747090]Search in Google Scholar
[Lackner, C., Sabbagh, M. A., Hallinan, E., Liu, X., & Holden, J. J. (2012). Dopamine receptor D4 gene variation predicts preschoolers’ developing theory of mind. Developmental Science, 15(2), 272–280.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01124.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lackner, C. L., Bowman, L. C., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2010). Dopaminergic functioning and preschoolers’ theory of mind. Neuropsychologia, 48(6), 1767–1774.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.027]Search in Google Scholar
[Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., & Scholl, B. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: developingwhat’andwhere’systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(1), 10–18.10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01113-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Lillard, A. (1998). Ethnopsychologies: cultural variations in theories of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 3.10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Low, J. (2010). Preschoolers’ implicit and explicit false-belief understanding: relations with complex syntactical mastery. Child Development, 81(2), 597–61510.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01418.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Low, J., Apperly, I. A., Butterfill, S. A., & Rakoczy, H. (2016). Cognitive architecture of reasoning in children and adults: A primer on the two-systems account. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 184-189.10.1111/cdep.12183]Search in Google Scholar
[Mars, R. B., Neubert, F. X., Noonan, M. P., Sallet, J., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. F. (2012). On the relationship between the “default mode network” and the “social brain”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 189.10.3389/fnhum.2012.00189]Search in Google Scholar
[Meert, G., Wang, J., & Samson, D. (2017). Efficient belief tracking in adults: The role of task instruction, low-level associative processes and dispositional social functioning. Cognition, 168, 91–98.10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Meltzoff, A. N. (1993). The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from Autism, 335–366.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moran, J. M., Young, L. L., Saxe, R., Lee, S. M., O’Young, D., Mavros, P. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2011). Impaired theory of mind for moral judgment in high-functioning autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2688–2692.10.1073/pnas.1011734108]Search in Google Scholar
[Moses, L. J. (2001). Executive accounts of theory-of-mind development. Child Development, 72(3), 688–690.10.1111/1467-8624.00306]Search in Google Scholar
[Naughtin, C. K., Horne, K., Schneider, D., Venini, D., York, A., & Dux, P. E. (2017). Do implicit and explicit belief processing share neural substrates? Human Brain Mapping, 38(9), 4760–4772.10.1002/hbm.23700]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, K. (1998). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, K., Plesa, D., & Henseler, S. (1998). Children’s theory of mind: An experiential interpretation. Human Development, 41(1), 7–29.10.1159/000022565]Search in Google Scholar
[Nijhof, A. D., Brass, M., Bardi, L., & Wiersema, J. R. (2016). Measuring mentalizing ability: A within-subject comparison between an explicit and implicit version of a ball detection task. PloS one, 11(10): e0164373. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.016437310.1371/journal.pone.0164373]Search in Google Scholar
[Nijhof, A. D., Bardi, L., Brass, M., & Wiersema, J. R. (2018). Brain activity for spontaneous and explicit mentalizing in adults with autism spectrum disorder: An fMRI study. NeuroImage: Clinical, 18, 475–484.10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Oktay-Gür, N., Schulz, A., & Rakoczy, H. (2018). Children exhibit different performance patterns in explicit and implicit theory of mind tasks. Cognition, 173, 60–74.10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false-beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255–258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peterson, C., Slaughter, V., Moore, C., & Wellman, H. M. (2016). Peer social skills and theory of mind in children with autism, deafness, or typical development. Developmental Psychology, 52(1), 46.10.1037/a0039833]Search in Google Scholar
[Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V. P., & Paynter, J. (2007). Social maturity and theory of mind in typically developing children and those on the autism spectrum. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(12), 1243–1250.10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01810.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, J., Ong, D. C., Surtees, A. D., Xin, Y., Williams, S., Saxe, R., & Frank, M. C. (2015). A second look at automatic theory of mind: Reconsidering Kovács, Téglás, and Endress (2010). Psychological Science, 26(9), 1353–1367.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poulin-Dubois, D., & Yott, J. (2018). Probing the depth of infants’ theory of mind: Disunity in performance across paradigms. Developmental Science, 21(4), e12600.10.1111/desc.12600]Search in Google Scholar
[Premack, D. (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36(1), 1–16.10.1016/0010-0277(90)90051-K]Search in Google Scholar
[Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526.10.1017/S0140525X00076512]Search in Google Scholar
[Priewasser, B., Rafetseder, E., Gargitter, C., & Perner, J. (2017). Helping as an early indicator of a theory of mind: Mentalism or teleology?. Cognitive Development, 46, 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.00210.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rabinowitz, N. C., Perbet, F., Song, H. F., Zhang, C., Eslami, S. M., & Botvinick, M. (2018). Machine theory of mind. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07740.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, H., Lisandrelli, G., Riobueno-Naylor, A., & Saxe, R. (2018). Development of the social brain from age three to twelve years. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1027.10.1038/s41467-018-03399-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Rubio-Fernández, P., & Geurts, B. (2013). How to pass the false-belief task before your fourth birthday. Psychological Science, 24(1), 27–33.10.1177/0956797612447819]Search in Google Scholar
[Rubio-Fernández, P., Jara-Ettinger, J., & Gibson, E. (2017). Can processing demands explain toddlers’ performance in false-belief tasks?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(19), E3750–E3750.10.1073/pnas.1701286114]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabbagh, M. A., Bowman, L. C., Evraire, L. E., & Ito, J. (2009). Neurodevelopmental correlates of theory of mind in preschool children. Child Development, 80(4), 1147–1162.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01322.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Samson, D., Apperly, I., Braithwaite, J., Andrews, B., & Bodley Scott, S. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1255–1266.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaafsma, S. M., Pfaff, D. W., Spunt, R. P., & Adolphs, R. (2015). Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 65–72.10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Scheeren, A. M., de Rosnay, M., Koot, H. M., & Begeer, S. (2013). Rethinking theory of mind in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(6), 628–635.10.1111/jcpp.12007]Search in Google Scholar
[Schick, B., de Villiers, P., de Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78(2), 376–396.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01004.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, D., Lam, R., Bayliss, A. P., & Dux, P. E. (2012). Cognitive load disrupts implicit theory-of-mind processing. Psychological Science, 23(8), 842–847.10.1177/0956797612439070]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., Becker, S. I., & Dux, P. E. (2014). Implicit false-belief processing in the human brain. NeuroImage, 101, 268–275.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, D., Nott, Z. E., & Dux, P. E. (2014). Task instructions and implicit theory of mind. Cognition, 133, 43–47.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Schurz, M., Tholen, M. G., Perner, J., Mars, R. B., & Sallet, J. (2017). Specifying the brain anatomy underlying temporo-parietal junction activations for theory of mind: A review using probabilistic atlases from different imaging modalities. Human Brain Mapping, 38(9), 4788–4805.10.1002/hbm.23675]Search in Google Scholar
[Schuwerk, T., Vuori, M., & Sodian, B. (2015). Implicit and explicit theory of mind reasoning in autism spectrum disorders: The impact of experience. Autism, 19(4), 459–468.10.1177/1362361314526004]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, R. M. (2014). Post hoc versus predictive accounts of children’s theory of mind: A reply to Ruffman. Developmental Review, 34(3), 300–304.10.1016/j.dr.2014.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, R. M., & Baillargeon, R. (2009). Which penguin is this? Attributing false beliefs about object identity at 18 months. Child Development, 80(4), 1172–1196.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01324.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, R. M., & Baillargeon, R. (2017). Early false-belief understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(4), 237–249.10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Shahaeian, A., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & Wellman, H. M. (2011). Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1239.10.1037/a0023899]Search in Google Scholar
[Slaughter, V. (2015). Theory of mind in infants and young children: a review. Australian Psychologist, 50(3), 169–172.10.1111/ap.12080]Search in Google Scholar
[Sodian, B. (2016). Is false-belief understanding continuous from infancy to preschool age? In D. Barner & A. S. Baron (Eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change (p. 301), Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sommerville, J. A., Bernstein, D. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2013). Measuring beliefs in centimeters: Private knowledge biases preschoolers’ and adults’ representation of others’ beliefs. Child Development, 84(6), 1846–1854.10.1111/cdev.12110]Search in Google Scholar
[Southgate, V. (2018). The puzzle of early mentalizing: A unitary theory of infants’ successes and preschoolers’ failures. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/Y2GHQ]Search in Google Scholar
[Spreng, R. N., & Grady, C. L. (2010). Patterns of brain activity supporting autobiographical memory, prospection, and theory of mind, and their relationship to the default mode network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1112–1123.10.1162/jocn.2009.21282]Search in Google Scholar
[Stojnić, G. (2017). Can two-year olds understand others’ false-beliefs about object identities? (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick).]Search in Google Scholar
[Stojnić, G. & Leslie, A. M. (2018). Poster presented at 9th Budapest Conference on Cognitive Development, Budapest, January 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thoermer, C., Sodian, B., Vuori, M., Perst, H., & Kristen, S. (2012). Continuity from an implicit to an explicit understanding of false-belief from infancy to preschool age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 172–187.10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02067.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development, 103–130.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomasello, M. (2018). How children come to understand false-beliefs: A shared intentionality account. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(34), 8491–8498.10.1073/pnas.1804761115]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, L., & Leslie, A. M. (2016). Is Implicit Theory of Mind the ‘Real Deal’? The Own-Belief/True-Belief Default in Adults and Young Preschoolers. Mind & Language, 31(2), 147–176.10.1111/mila.12099]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199334919.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellman, H. M. (2017). The development of theory of mind: Historical reflections. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 207–214.10.1111/cdep.12236]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523–541.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellman, H. M., & Woolley, J. D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35, 245–275.10.1016/0010-0277(90)90024-E]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellman, H. M., Fang, F., & Peterson, C. C. (2011). Sequential progressions in a theory-of-mind scale: Longitudinal perspectives. Child Development, 82(3), 780–792.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01583.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Yott, J., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2016). Are infants’ theory-of-mind abilities well integrated? Implicit understanding of intentions, desires, and beliefs. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17(5), 683–698.10.1080/15248372.2015.1086771]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaitchik, D. (1990). When representations conflict with reality: The preschooler’s problem with false-beliefs and “false” photographs. Cognition, 35(1), 41–68.10.1016/0010-0277(90)90036-J]Search in Google Scholar
[Zelazo, P. D., Carlson, S. M., & Kesek, A. (2008). The development of executive function in childhood. In C. A. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.), Developmental cognitive neuroscience. Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 553–574). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Pres]Search in Google Scholar
