[Adolph, K. E., & Kretch, K. S. (2015). Gibson’s theory of perceptual learning. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition, 2015, 127-134. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23096-110.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23096-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91-130. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-710.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Anderson, M. L. (2014). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10111.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, M. L. (2016). Précis of after phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1-45. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X1500063110.1017/S0140525X15000631]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Andrick, G., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1986). The acquisition of colour terms. Journal of Child Language, 13(1), 119-134. doi: 10.1017/S030500090000 033710.1017/S0305000900000337]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., Kuipers, J., & Thierry, G. (2009). The Whorfian mind. Electrophysiological evidence that language shapes perception. Journal Communicative & Integrative Biology, 2(4), 332-334. doi: 10.4161/cib.2.4.840010.4161/cib.2.4.8400]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Aristotle (1975). Categories and De Interpretatione. J.L. Ackrill (Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baggs, E. (2015). A radical empiricist theory of speaking: Linguistic meaning without conventions. Ecological Psychology, 27(3), 251-264. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2015.106865510.1080/10407413.2015.1068655]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bakhtin, M. M. (1982). The dialogical imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. California, CA: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bingham, G. P. (1988) Task-specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck. Human Movement Science, 2(2-4), 225-264. doi: 10.1016/0167- 9457(88)90013-910.1016/0167-9457(88)90013-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Boutonnet, B., Dering, B., Viñas-Guasch, N., & Thierry, G. (2013). Seeing objects through the language glass. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(10), 1702-1710. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00415 Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139 - 159.10.1162/jocn_a_00415]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(599), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.0059910.3389/fnhum.2014.00599]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruineberg, J., Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2016). The anticipating brain is not a scientist: the free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese, 1-28. doi: 10.1007/s11229-016-1239-110.1007/s11229-016-1239-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cairns, H. & Cairns, C. (1976) Psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 1-27. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X10.1017/S0140525X1500031X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Clark, A. (1996). Linguistic anchors in the sea of thought? Pragmatics & Cognition, 4(1), 93-103. doi: 10.1075/pc.4.1.09cla10.1075/pc.4.1.09cla]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101, 401-431.10.1007/BF01063896]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, E. V. (1981). Acquisitional principles in lexical development. In: S.A. Gelman & J.P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought interrelations in development (pp. 31-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511983689.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cowley, S. J. (2011a). Distributed language. In: Cowley, S. (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 185-210). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1017/CBO9780511806698]Search in Google Scholar
[Cowley, S. J. (2011b). Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23, 1-25. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2011.59127210.1080/10407413.2011.591272]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2015). From participatory sense-making to language: there and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1089-1125. doi: 10.1007/s11097-014-9404-910.1007/s11097-014-9404-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cruse, D. A. (2017). The Lexicon. In: M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics 2nd edition (pp. 235-254). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Davidoff, J., & Luzzatti, C. (2005). Language impairment and colour categories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(4), 494-495. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X05280081/10.1017/S0140525X05280081]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Davidoff, J., & Roberson, D. (2004) Preserved thematic and impaired taxonomic categorisation: A case study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(1), 137-174. doi: 10.1080/0169096034400012510.1080/01690960344000125]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Davidson, D., 1986. A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E. Lepore (Ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 433-446). Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, H.G., Taylor, T. J. (Eds.). (1990). Redefining linguistics. London/New York, NY: Routledge. Davis, H.G., Taylor, T. J. (Eds.). (2003). Rethinking linguistics. London/New York, NY RoutledgeCurzon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Degenaar, J., & Myin, E. (2014). Representation hunger reconsidered. Synthese, 191, 3639-3648. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0484-410.1007/s11229-014-0484-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Devitt, M. (2006). Ignorance of language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199250960.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[De Haan, S., Rietveld, E., Stokhof, M., & Denys, D. (2013) The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: An enactive affordance-based model. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013. 0065310.3389/fnhum.2013.00653]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[De Saussure, F. (2011). Cours de linguistique generale (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published in 1922).]Search in Google Scholar
[Drivonikou, G. V., Kay, P., Regier, T., Ivry, R. B., Gilbert, A. L., Franklin, A., & Davies, I. R. L., (2007). Further evidence that Whorfian effects are stronger in the right visual field than the left. PNAS, 104(3), 1097-1102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061013210410.1073/pnas.0610132104]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dummett, M. (1975). Wang’s paradox. Synthese, 3(4), 201-232. doi: 10.1007/ BF0048504810.1007/BF00485048]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Engel, K., Maye, A., Kurthen, M., & König, P. (2013). Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006 Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, S. J., Bates, E., Thal, D. J ., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, (5, serial No. 242).10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006Fenson..S.ReznickS.J..ThalD.J.,&Pethick,S.J.(1994)..59(5,serialNo.242)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J. A., (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J. A. (2008). LOT 2: The language of thought revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Franklin, A., Drivonikou, G. V., Clifford, A., Kay, P., Regier, T., Davies, I. R. L. (2008). Lateralization of categorical perception of color changes with color term acquisition. PNAS, 105(47), 18221-18225. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0809952105 Franklin, A., Drivonikou, G. V., Bevis, L., Davies, I. R. L., Kay, P., Regier, T. (2008). Categorical perception of color is lateralized to the right hemisphere in infants, but to the left hemisphere in adults. PNAS, 105(9), 3221-3225. doi:10.1073/pnas.071228610510.1073/pnas.0809952105.........(2008)..PNAS,105(9),3221-3225.doi:10.1073/pnas.0712286105]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gallagher, S. (2015). Seeing things in the right way: How social interaction shapes perception. In D. Maxime and Th. Breyer (Eds.), Normativity in perception (pp. 117-127). London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137377920_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, E. J. (1953). Improvement in perceptual judgments as a function of controlled practice or training. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 401-431.10.1037/h0055517]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, E.J. (1963). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 29- 59. Gibson, E. J. & Rader, N. (1979). Attention - The perceiver as performer. In G. Hale (Ed.), Attention and cognitive development (pp. 1-21). New York, NY: Plenum Press. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. PNAS, 103(2), 489-494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.050986810310.1073/pnas.0509868103]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2008). Support for lateralization of the Whorf effect beyond the realm of color discrimination. Brain and Language, 105(2), 91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.06.00110.1016/j.bandl.2007.06.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harris, R. (1980). The language-makers. London: Duckworth. Harris, R. (1990). On redefining linguistics. In H. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining Linguistics. London/New York, NY: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Pergamon, Oxford. Harvey, M. I. (2015). Content in languaging: why radical enactivism is incompatible with representational theories of language. Language Sciences, 48, 90-129. Haugeland, J. (2013). Dasein disclosed. Cambridge, MA.: The Harvard University Press.10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism. Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262018548.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2017). Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representation to the education of attention. In: H. Whitehouse (Ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113-153). New York, NY: Berg. Jackendoff, R. (1996). How language helps us thinks. Pragmatics & Cognition, 4(1), 1-34. doi: 10.1075/pc.4.1.03jac10.1075/pc.4.1.03jac]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ježek, E. (2016). The lexicon: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiverstein, J. & Clark, A. (2009) Introduction: Mind embodied, embedded, enacted: One church or many? Topoi, 28, 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11245-008- 9041-410.1007/s11245-008-9041-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kiverstein, J. & Rietveld, E. (2018). Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: an ecological-enactive proposal. Adaptive Behavior, 1-17. doi: 10.1177/10597123187727710.1177/105971231877277]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kravchenko, A. V. (2007). Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences, 29, 650-671. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci. 2007.01.00410.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kravchenko, A. V. (2009). The experiental basis of speech and writing as different cognitive domains. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 527-548. doi: 10.1075/ p&c.17.3.03kra10.1075/p&c.17.3.03kra]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kukla, R. (2017). Ostension and assertion. In: Z. Adams and J. Browning (Eds.) Giving a damn - Essays in dialogue with John Haugeland (pp. 103-130). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262035248.003.0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203342763]Search in Google Scholar
[Locke, J. (2004). An essay concerning human understanding. R. Woolhouse (Ed.). London: Penguin Books. (Original work published in 1690)10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020]Search in Google Scholar
[Love, N. (1990). The locus of languages in a redefined linguistics. In: H. G. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining Linguistics (pp. 53-118). London/ New York, NY: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525- 544. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.00310.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Love, N. (2007). Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, 29, 690-709. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.00810.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Love, N. (2017). On languaging and languages. Language Sciences, 61, 1-35. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.00110.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.0005410.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lupyan, G. (2016). The centrality of language in human cognition. Language Learning, 66(3), 516-553. doi: 10.1111/lang.1215510.1111/lang.12155]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LupyanG., & Spivey, M.J. (2010). Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2236- 2253. doi: 10.3758/BF0319669810.3758/BF03196698]Search in Google Scholar
[Lupyan, G. & Swingley, D. (2012). Self-directed speech affects visual search performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1068-1085. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.64703910.1080/17470218.2011.647039]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Markman, E.M. (1981). The whole-object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings. In: S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought Interrelations in development, 72-107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511983689.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller, G. A. & Lenneberg, E. (Eds.), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. New York, NY: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthews, R., (2003). Does linguistic competence require knowledge of language? In: Barber, A. (Ed.), Epistemology of Language (pp. 187-213). Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Myin, E. (2016). Perception as something we do. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(5-6), 80-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674063013]Search in Google Scholar
[Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. London/New York, NY: Routledge. O’Regan, J. K. & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 883-917. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X0100011510.1017/S0140525X01000115]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Papafragou, A. (2005). Relations between language and thought: Individuation and the count/mass distinction. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science (pp. 256-272). Oxford: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pilling, M., Wiggett, A., Özgen, E., & Davies, I.R.L. (2003). Is color “categorical perception” really perceptual? Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 538-551. doi: 10.3758/BF0319609510.3758/BF03196095]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company.10.1037/e412952005-009]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. London: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pitchford, N. J. & Mullen, K. T. (2002). Is the acquisition of basic-colour terms in young children constrained? Perception, 31, 1349-1370. doi: 10.1068/p340510.1068/p3405]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Proffitt, D. R., & Linkenauger, S. A. ( 2013 ). Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression. In: W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 171 - 197). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262018555.003.0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2009). Symbols as constraints: The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 653-676.10.1075/pc.17.3.09ras]Search in Google Scholar
[Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2011). Language as a system of replicable constraints. In H. Pattee (Ed.), Laws, language and life: Howard Pattee's classic papers on the physics of symbols (pp. 295-333). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5161-3_19]Search in Google Scholar
[Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2016) How does a word become a message? An illustration on a developmental time-scale. New Ideas in Psychology, 42, 46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.00110.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Reconciling symbolic and dynamic aspects of language: Toward a dynamic psycholinguistics. New Ideas in Psychology, 26(2), 193-207.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Nomikou, I., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2013). Young children's dialogical actions: the beginnings of purposeful intersubjectivity. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5(3), 210-221. doi: 10.1109/TAMD.2013.2273258.10.1109/TAMD.2013.2273258]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Reddy, M. J. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd Edition) (pp. 164-201). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Reed, E. S. (1995). The ecological approach to language development: A radical solution to Chomsky's and Quine's problems. Language & Communication, 15(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1016/0271-5309(94)E0010-910.1016/0271-5309(94)E0010-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology (1st ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Regier, T. & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(10), 439-446. doi: 10.1016/j.tics. 2009.07.00110.1016/j.tics.2009.07.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Rietveld, E. & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325-352. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2014. 95803510.1080/10407413.2014.958035]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Roberson, D. & Davidoff, J. (2000). The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions- the effect of verbal interference. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 977-986. doi: 10.3758/BF0320934510.3758/BF03209345]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. R. L., & Shapiro, L. R. (2005). The development of color categories in two languages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 554-571. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.55410.1037/0096-3445.133.4.554]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Roberson, D., Davies, I. R. L., & Davidoff, J., (2000). Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 369-398. doi: 10.1037//10 096-3445.129.3.36910.1037//10096-3445.129.3.369]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rosch Heider, E., & Olivier, D. C. (1972). The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 337-354.10.1016/0010-0285(72)90011-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Runeson, S. (1977).On the possibility of “smart” perceptual mechanisms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 172-179.10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00274.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryle, G. (1945a). Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 46, 1-16. http://www.jstor.org/stable/454440510.1093/aristotelian/46.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryle, G. (1945b) Philosophical arguments. In G. Ryle (2009) Collected Essays 1929-1968, 203-221. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203875308]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind 60th anniversary edition. J. Tanney (Ed.). London/New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published in 1949)10.4324/9780203875858]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart, J. (2010). Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: From the origin of life to consciousness and writing. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. 1-32). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014601.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Suegami, T., Aminihajibashi, S., & Laeng, B. (2014). Another look at category effects on colour perception and lateralisation. Cognitive Processing, 15(2), 217-226. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0595-810.1007/s10339-013-0595-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tanney, J. (2015) Gilbert Ryle. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), E. N. Zalta (Ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ryle/>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, T. J. (1990). Normativity and linguistic form. In H. G. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining Linguistics (pp. 118-148). London/New York, NY: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, T. J. (1992). Mutual misunderstanding: Scepticism and the theorizing of language and interpretation. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press/ Routledge.10.2307/j.ctv125jj2b]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, T. J. (2000). Language constructing language: the implications of reflexivity for linguistic theory. Language Sciences, 22, 483-499. doi: 10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00016-410.1016/S0388-0001(00)00016-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Taylor, T. J. (2010). Where does language come from? The role of reflexive enculturation in language development. Language Sciences, 32, 14-27. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.01410.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Taylor, T. J. (2013). Calibrating the child for language: Meredith Williams on a Wittgensteinian approach to language socialization. Language Sciences, 40, 308-320. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.00210.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wigget, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. PNAS, 106(11), 4567-4570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081115510610.1073/pnas.0811155106]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R., Reed, E., & Mace, W. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. Cognition, 9, 237- 304.10.1016/0010-0277(81)90002-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Van den Herik, J. C. (2017). Linguistic know-how and the orders of language. Language Sciences, 61, 17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.00910.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Dijk, L., Withagen, R., & Bongers, R. M. (2015). Information without content: A Gibsonian reply to enactivists’ worries. Cognition, 134, 210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.01210.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Elk, M., Slors, M., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Embodied language comprehension requires an enactivist paradigm of cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(234), 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.0023410.3389/fpsyg.2010.00234]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 615-628.10.1017/S0140525X98001733]Search in Google Scholar
[Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E., (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Verbrugge, R. R. (1985). Language and event perception: steps toward a synthesis. In W. H. Warren, & R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and change. Proceedings of the first international conference on event perception (pp. 157-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Voloshinov, V.N. (1930/1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). New York, NZ/London: Seminar Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. New York, NZ: Harper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.0005810.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636. doi: 10.3758/BF0319632210.3758/BF03196322]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. PNAS, 104(19), 7780-7785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.070164410410.1073/pnas.0701644104]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2009). Philosophical investigations (Revised 4th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhu, Q., & Bingham, G. P. (2010). Learning to perceive the affordance for long-distance throwing: smart mechanism or function learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 862-875. doi: 10.1037/a001873810.1037/a0018738]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zukow-Goldring, P. & Ferko, K. R. (1994). An ecological approach to the emergence of the lexicon: Socializing attention. In V. John-Steiner, C. Panofsky, & L. Smith (Eds.), Sociocultural approaches to language and literacy: an interactionist perspective (pp. 170-194). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511897047.008]Search in Google Scholar