[1. Wulf G., Shea Ch.H., Lewthwaite R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Medical Education 44, 75-84.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x20078758]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Ste-Marie D.M., Vertes K.A., Law B., Rymal A.M. (2013). Learner-controlled self-observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1-10.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556355450523355826]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Ashford D., Davis K.W., Bennett S.J. (2007). Developmental effects influencing observational modelling: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences 25(5), 547-58. DOI: 10.1080/02640410600947025.10.1080/0264041060094702517365541]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Nogal M., Niźnikowski T. (2020). Feedback during learning gymnastic exercises. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury 8, 94-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. McCullagh P., Weiss M. (2001). Modeling: Considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. In R.N. Singer, H.A. Hausenblas, C.M. Janelle (eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 205-238). New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Ste-Marie D.M., Rymal A., Vertes K., Martini R. (2011). Self-modeling and competitive beam performance enhancement examined within a self-regulation perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 23, 292-307.10.1080/10413200.2011.558049]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Robertson R., St. Germain L., Ste-Marie D.M. (2018). The effects of self-observation when combined with a skilled model on the learning of gymnastics skills. Journal of Motor Learning and Development 6, 18-34.10.1123/jmld.2016-0027]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Clark S.E., Ste-Marie D.M. (2007). The impact of self-asa-model interventions on children’s self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences 25, 577-586.10.1080/0264041060094709017365543]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Anderson R., Campbell M.J. (2015). Accelerating Skill Acquisition in Rowing Using Self-Based Observational Learning and Expert Modelling during Performance. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 10(2-3), 425-437.10.1260/1747-9541.10.2-3.425]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Ste-Marie D.M., Law B., Rymal A.M., Jenny O., Hall C., McCullagh P. (2012). Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance: An applied model for the use of observation. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 5(2), 145-176.10.1080/1750984X.2012.665076]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Ste-Marie D.M., Lelievre N., St. Germain L. (2020). Revisiting the Applied Model for the Use of Observation: A Review of Articles Spanning 2011-2018. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport Jan 31, 1-24, Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1693489.10.1080/02701367.2019.169348932004119]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Sidaway B., Hand J. (1993). Frequency of modeling effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 64, 122-126.10.1080/02701367.1993.106087868451528]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Wrisberg C.A., Pein R.L. (2002). Note on learners’ control of frequency of model presentation during skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills 94, 792-794.10.2466/pms.2002.94.3.79212081283]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Wulf G., Raupach M., Pfeiffer F. (2005). Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 76, 107-111.10.1080/02701367.2005.1059926615810775]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Aiken C.A., Fairbrother J.T., Post P.G. (2012). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1-8.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00338343882022973257]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Sanli E.A., Patterson J.T., Bray S.R., Lee T.D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 611, 1-17.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611357688923430980]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 23(5), 1382-1414.10.3758/s13423-015-0999-926833314]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Ste-Marie D.M., Carter M.J., Law B., Vertes K., Smith V. (2016). Self-controlled learning benefits: Exploring contributions of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation via path analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences 34, 1650-1656.10.1080/02640414.2015.113023626707002]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Lemos A., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R., Chiviacowsky S. (2017). Autonomy support enhances performance expectancies, positive affect, and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 31, 28-34.10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.03.009]Search in Google Scholar
[20. St. Germain L., Lelievre N., Ste-Marie D.M. (2019). Variations in observation frequency in a self-controlled learning environment do not modulate learning of a pirouette en dehors. Journal of Sports Sciences 37, 2106-2113.10.1080/02640414.2019.162147731126221]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Winstein C.J., Pohl P.S., Lewthwaite R. (1994). Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 65, 316-323.10.1080/02701367.1994.106076357886280]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Park J.H., Shea C.H., Wright D.L. (2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: a test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior 32, 287-296.10.1080/0022289000960137910975276]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Ghorbani S., Bund A. (2016). Observational learning of a new motor skill: The effect of different model demonstrations. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 11(4), 514-522.10.1177/1747954116655049]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.G., Buchner A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods 39(2), 175-191.10.3758/BF03193146]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1), 155-159.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Wulf G., Shea Ch.H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9, 185-211.10.3758/BF03196276]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Marchal-Crespo L., van Raai M., Rauter G., Wolf P., Riener R. (2013). The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task. Experimental Brain Research 231, 277-291.10.1007/s00221-013-3690-224013789]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Badets A., Blandin Y. (2004). The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior 36, 62-70.10.3200/JMBR.36.1.62-7014766489]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Fagundes J., Chen D.D., Laguna P. (2013). Self-control and frequency of model presentation: Effects on learning a ballet passé relevé. Human Movement Science 32(4), 847-856.10.1016/j.humov.2013.03.00923973094]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Post P.G., Aiken C.A., Laughlin D.D., Fairbrother J.T. (2016). Self-control over combined video feedback and modeling facilitates motor learning. Human Movement Science 47, 49-59.10.1016/j.humov.2016.01.01426874750]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Shea C.H., Wulf G., Whitacre C. (1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior 31, 119-125.10.1080/0022289990960098311177626]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Porter C., Greenwood D., Panchuk D., Pepping G.J. (2020). Learner-adapted practice promotes skill transfer in unskilled adults learning the basketball set shot. European Journal of Sport Science 20(1), 61-71.10.1080/17461391.2019.161193131079552]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Sigrist R., Rauter G., Riener R., Wolf P. (2013). Terminal Feedback Outperforms Concurrent Visual, Auditory, and Haptic Feedback in Learning a Complex Rowing-Type Task. Journal of Motor Behavior 45, 455-472.10.1080/00222895.2013.82616924006910]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Sidaway B., Bates J., Occhiogrosso B., Schlagenhaufer J., Wilkes D. (2012). Interaction of Feedback Frequency and Task Difficulty in Children’s Motor Skill Learning. Physical Therapy 92(7), 948-956.10.2522/ptj.2011037822421736]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Wulf G., Shea Ch.H., Matschiner S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 30, 180-192.10.1080/0022289980960133520037033]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Wulf G., Chiviacowsky S., Schiller E., Ávila L.T.G. (2010). Frequent external-focus feedback enhances motor learning. Frontiers in Psychology 1, 190.10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00190315379921833250]Search in Google Scholar