Comparing eDQE and eNEQ metrics – is there an alternative approach to assessing image quality in digital mammography?

1 https://profilaktykaraka.pib-nio.pl/kontrola-jakosci/, in Polish, access: May 2023 Search in Google Scholar

2 Wysocka-Rabin A, Dobrzyńska M, Pasicz K, Skrzyński W, Fabiszewska E. Determination of DQE as a quantitative assessment of detectors in digital mammography: Measurements and calculation in practice. Pol J Med Phys Eng. 2021;27(3):223-232. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2021-0027 Search in Google Scholar

3 Dobrzyńska M, Wysocka-Rabin A, Fabiszewska E, Pasicz K, Skrzyński W. New Software for DQE Calculation in Digital Mammography Compliant with IEC 62220–1-2. J Dig Imag 2022;35(5):1069-1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00546-y Search in Google Scholar

4 Van Engen R, Young K, Bosmans H, Thijssen H. The European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspect of mammography screening, Luxembourg. 2006 Search in Google Scholar

5 Young K, Johnson B, Bosmans H, Van Engen R. Development of minimum standards for image quality and dose in digital mammography. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2005, 149-154. Search in Google Scholar

6 Young K, Alsager A, Oduko J, Bosmans H, et al. Evaluation of software for reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems. In: Medical Imaging 2008: Physics of Medical Imaging. Edited by Hsieh, Jiang; Samei, Ehsan. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 6913, article id. 69131C. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770571 Search in Google Scholar

7 Cunningham, I. (2000) Applied Linear-Systems Theory. In: Van Metter RL, Beutel J, Kundel HR (Eds). Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics. Bellingham: Press SPIE, 79-159. https://doi.org/10.1117/3.832716.ch2 Search in Google Scholar

8 Samei E, Ranger N, MacKenzie A, Honey I, Dobbins J, Ravin C. Detector or System? Extending the Concept of Detective Quantum Efficiency to Characterize the Performance of Digital Radiographic Imaging Systems. Radiology. 2008;249(3):926-937. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2492071734 Search in Google Scholar

9 Samei E, Ranger N, Mackenzie A, Honey I, Dobbins J, Ravin C. Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: An experimental methodology. Med Phys. 2009;36(8):3806-3817. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3171690 Search in Google Scholar

10 Kyprianou I, Rudin S, Bednarek D, Hoffmann K. Study of the Generalized MTF and DQE for a New Microangiographic System. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2004;5368:349-360. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.533512 Search in Google Scholar

11 Kyprianou I, Rudin S, Bednarek D, Hoffmann K. Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: Application to a new microangiographic system. Medical Physics. 2005;32(2):613-626. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1844151 Search in Google Scholar

12 Bertolini M, Nitrosi A, Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Pattacini P, Gonocchi V Iori M. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency. Med Phys. 2021;39(5):2617-2627. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4704500 Search in Google Scholar

13 Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW. Effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) and effective noise equivalent quanta (eNEQ) for system optimization purposes in digital mammography. Proc SPIE 8313, Medical Imaging: Physics of Medical Imaging. 2012;8313:83130H. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.911193 Search in Google Scholar

14 Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics. Med Phys. 2013;40(1):101916. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4820362 Search in Google Scholar

15 International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment - Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices - Part 1-2: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency - Detectors used in mammography. IEC 62220-1-2:2007. Search in Google Scholar

16 Saunders RS, Samei E, Jesneck JL, Lo JY. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector. Med Phys. 2005;32(2):588-599. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1855033 Search in Google Scholar

17 Carton AK, Acciavatti R, Kuo J, Maidment ADA. The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(Tl) full-field flat panel detector. Med Phys. 2008;36(3):920-928. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3077922 Search in Google Scholar

18 Siemens Healthcare GmbH. Online tool for the simulation of X-ray Spectra. https://www.oem-products.siemens-healthineers.com//xray-spectra-simulation. access: May 2023, https://bps.healthcare.siemens-healthineers.com/booneweb/index.html Search in Google Scholar

19 Thomas JA, Chakrabarti K, Kaczmarek R, Romanyukha A. Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology. Med Phys. 2005;32:807-814. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1862097 Search in Google Scholar

20 European Commission. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Fourth edition, supplements, 2013. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2772/13196 Search in Google Scholar

21 Rowlands J, Yorkston J. Flat Panel Detectors for Digital Radiography. In: Van Metter RL, Beutel J, Kundel HR (Eds). Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics. Bellingham: Press SPIE, 223-329. https://doi.org/10.1117/3.832716.ch4 Search in Google Scholar