Midline catheters – what could be done better? A retrospective evaluation of clinical registry

1 Moureau N, Chopra V. Indications for peripheral, midline and central catheters: summary of the MAGIC recommendations. Br. J. Nurs. 2016; 25(8): S15-24. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.8.S15. PMID: 27126759. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2 Adams DZ, Little A, Vinsant C, et al. The Midline Catheter: A Clinical Review. J. Emerg. Med. 2016 Sep; 51(3): 252-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.29. Epub. 2016 Jul 5. PMID: 27397766. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3 DeVries M, Lee J, Hoff man L. Infection free midline catheter implementation at a community hospital (2 years). Am. J. Infect. Control. 2019; 47(9): 1118-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 30. PMID: 31047692. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4 Position of the Polish Association of Anaesthetist and Intensive Care Nurses and the National Consultant in Anaesthetist and Intensive Care Nursing on the use of ultrasound by nursing staff in order to identify veins for cannulation and to perform the insertion of a peripheral midline catheter. [www]: https://www.ptpaio.pl/aktualnosci/dokumenty/139.pdf, dostęp: 20.03.2022. Search in Google Scholar

5 Galen B, Baron S, Young S, et al Reducing peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters by training nurses in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2020; 29: 245-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009923. Search in Google Scholar

6 Davis EM, Feinsmith S, Amick AE, et al. Difficult intravenous access in the emergency department: Performance and impact of ultrasound-guided IV insertion performed by nurses. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2021; 46: 539-544. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 7. PMID: 33191044. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7 Tripathi S, Kumar S, Kaushik S. The Practice and Complications of Midline Catheters: A Systematic Review. Crit. Care Med. 2021; 49(2): e140-e150. doi: 10.1097/ CCM.0000000000004764. PMID: 33372744. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8 Chopra V, Kaatz S, Swaminathan L, et al. Variation in use and outcomes related to midline catheters: results from a multicentre pilot study. BMJ. Qual. Saf. 2019; 28(9): 714-720. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008554. Epub 2019 Mar 18. PMID: 30886119; PMCID: PMC6860966. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9 Nickel B. Does the Midline Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Have a Place in Critical Care? Crit. Care Nurse. 2021; 41(6): e1-e21. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021818. PMID: 34851379. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10 Jeon MH, Kim CS, Han KD, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Midline Catheters with Integrated Wire Accelerated Seldinger Technique. Vasc. Specialist Int. 2022; 38: 2. doi: 10.5758/vsi.210062. PMID: 35307696. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11 Misiołek H, Karpe J, Jałowiecki P, et al. Usefulness of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterisation in patients with end-stage renal disease. Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. 2012; 44(4): 208-211. PMID: 23348488. Search in Google Scholar

12 Scoppettuolo G, Pittiruti M, Pitoni S, et al. Ultrasound-guided „short” midline catheters for diffi cult venous access in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 2016; 9(1): 3. doi: 10.1186/s12245-016-0100-0. Epub 2016 Feb 4. PMID: 26847572; PMCID: PMC4742453. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13 Spiegel RJ, Eraso D, Leibner E, et al. The Utility of Midline Intravenous Catheters in Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2020; 75(4): 538-545. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Dec 24. PMID: 31882244. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14 Amick AE, Feinsmith SE, Davis EM, et al. Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Improves Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Skills of Practicing Nurses. Simul. Healthc. 2022;17(1): 7-14. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000545. PMID: 33428356. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15 Amick AE, Feinsmith SE, Sell Jet al. Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Training Reduces Use of Midline Catheters in Hospitalized Patients With Difficult Intravenous Access. J. Patient Saf. 2022; 18(3): e697-e703. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000910. PMID: 34570003. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16 Bagley K. Development and Implementation of an Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Education Program for Critical Care Nurses. Dimens. Crit. Care Nurs. 2022; 41(4): 182-189. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000528. PMID: 35617582. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17 Zitek T, Busby E, Hudson H, et al. Ultrasound-guided Placement of Single-lumen Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in the Internal Jugular Vein. West J. Emerg. Med. 2018; 19(5): 808-812. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.6.37883 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18 Tran QK, Fairchild M, Yardi I, et al. Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation versus Standard of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2021; 47(11): 3068-3078. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Aug 3. PMID: 34353670. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19 Smith C. Should nurses be trained to use ultrasound for intravenous access to patients with difficult veins? Emerg. Nurse. 2018; 26(2): 18-24. doi: 10.7748/en.2018.e1733. Epub 2018 Jun 14. PMID: 29901315. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20 Good RJ, Rothman KK, Ackil DJ, et al. Hand motion analysis for assessment of nursing competence in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement. J. Vasc. Access. 2019; 20(3): 301-306. doi: 10.1177/1129729818804997. Epub 2018 Oct 14. PMID: 30318990. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21 Reeves T, Morrison D, Altmiller G. A Nurse-Led Ultrasound-Enhanced Vascular Access Preservation Program. Am. J. Nurs. 2017; 117(12): 56-64. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000527490.24610.51. PMID: 29189249. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22 Lisova K, Hromadkova J, Pavelková K, et al. The incidence of symptomatic upper limb venous thrombosis associated with midline catheter: Prospective observation. J. Vasc. Access. 2018; 19(5): 492-495. doi: 10.1177/1129729818761276. Epub 2018 Mar 16. PMID: 29546782. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23 Bahl A, Diloreto E, Jankowski D, et al. Comparison of 2 Midline Catheter Devices With Differing Antithrombogenic Mechanisms for Catheter-Related Thrombosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open. 2021; 4(10): e2127836. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27836. PMID: 34613402; PMCID: PMC8495531. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24 Magnani C, Calvieri A, Giannarelli D,et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter, midline, and „short” midline in palliative care: Patient-reported outcome measures to assess impact on quality of care. J. Vasc. Access. 2019; 20(5): 475-481. doi: 10.1177/1129729818814732. Epub 2018 Dec 3. PMID: 30501549. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25 Armenteros-Yeguas V, Gárate-Echenique L, Tomás-López MA, et al. Prevalence of difficult venous access and associated risk factors in highly complex hospitalised patients. J. Clin. Nurs. 2017; 26(23-24): 4267-4275. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13750. Epub 2017 Mar 28. PMID: 28165645; PMCID: PMC6084302. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26 Gilardi E, Giannuzzi R, WoldeSellasie K, et al. Mini-midline in difficult intravenous access patients in emergency department: A prospective analysis. J. Vasc. Access. 2020; 21(4): 449-455. doi: 10.1177/1129729819883129. Epub 2019 Oct 24. PMID: 31647. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar