[Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2017). Opinion 2/2017 on data processing at work (WP249). European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2018). Guidelines on consent under Regulation 2016/679. Adopted on November 28, 2017. Revised and adopted on April 10, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2022). Essential jobs, remote work and digital surveillance: Addressing the COVID-19 pandemic panopticon. International Labour Review, 161(2), 289-314.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ball, K. (2022). Surveillance in the workplace: Past, present, and future. Surveillance and Society.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bodie, M. T. (2022). The law of employee data: privacy, property, governance. Ind. Lj, 97, 707.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Hert, P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2016). The new general data protection regulation: Still a sound system for the protection of individuals. Computer Law and Security Review, 32, 179–194.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ebert, I., Wildhaber, I., & Adams-Prassl, J. (2021). Big Data in the workplace: Privacy Due Diligence as a human rights-based approach to employee privacy protection. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211013051.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2017). Slave to the algorithm? Why a “right to an explanation” is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law & Technology Review, 16, 18-84.]Search in Google Scholar
[Isbasoiu, G. D. (2023). Tourists as stakeholders: For a better tourist involvement in promoting sustainable tourism. Jus et Civitas, 10, 41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Isbasoiu, G. D. (2024). From blame to prevention: The role of just culture and fault tree analysis in managing human errors. Jus et Civitas, A Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.51865/JETC.2024.1.03]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamarinou, D., & Van Alsenoy, B. (2020). Data protection law in the EU: Roles, responsibilities, and liability. International Data Privacy Law, 10(4), 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipaa014]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuner, C., Bygrave, L. A., Docksey, C., Drechsler, L., & Tosoni, L. (2021). The EU General Data Protection Regulation: A commentary/update of selected articles. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3839645,]Search in Google Scholar
[Law No. 190 of July 18, 2018, on measures for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 27, 2016, on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). (2018). Official Gazette of Romania, No. 651, July 26, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ogriseg, C. (2017). GDPR and personal data protection in the employment context. Labour & Law Issues, 3(2), R. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/7573]Search in Google Scholar
[Merrick, R., & Ryan, S. (2019). Data privacy governance in the age of GDPR. Risk Management, 66(3), 38-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seerden, X., Salmela, H., & Rutkowski, A. F. (2018). Privacy governance and the GDPR: How are organizations taking action to comply with the new privacy regulations in europe. In ECMLG 2018 14th european conference on management, leadership and governance (p. 371).]Search in Google Scholar
[Spiecker genannt Döhmann, I. (2021). The legal framework for access to data from a data protection viewpoint – Especially under the GDPR. In Data access, consumer interests, and public welfare (pp. 175–198). German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection (Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz), Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb), Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748924999-175]Search in Google Scholar
[Volosevici, D. (2018). Some considerations on video-surveillance and data protection. Jus et Civitas: A Journal of Social and Legal Studies, 69(2), 7-14.]Search in Google Scholar
