[
Albu, N., Albu, C. N., Apostol, O., & Cho, C. H. (2021). The past is never dead: The role of imprints in shaping social and environmental reporting in a post-communist context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(5), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2019-4131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alrazi, B., de Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. J. (2016). The environmental disclosures of the electricity generation industry: A global perspective. Accounting and Business Research, 46(6), 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1135781
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beusch, P., Frisk, J. E., Rosén, M., & Dilla, W. (2022). Management control for sustainability: Towards integrated systems. Management Accounting Research, 54, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100777
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blanco, C. C., Caro, F., & Corbett, C. J. (2020). Do carbon abatement opportunities become less profitable over time? A global firm-level perspective using CDP data. Energy Policy, 138, 111252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111252
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cotter, J., Najah, M., & Sophie Wang, S. (2011). Standardized reporting of climate change information in Australia. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(2), 294–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021111185420
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dragomir, V. D., Gorgan, C., Calu, D.-A., & Dumitru, M. (2022). The relevance and comparability of corporate financial reporting regarding renewable energy production in Europe. Renewable Energy Focus, 41, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2022.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dumitru, M., Dyduch, J., Gușe, R.-G., & Krasodomska, J. (2017). Corporate reporting practices in Poland and Romania – An ex-ante study to the new non-financial reporting European directive. Accounting in Europe, 14(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2017.1378427
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Escobar, L. F., & Vredenburg, H. (2011). Multinational oil companies and the adoption of sustainable development: A resource-based and institutional theory interpretation of adoption heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0534-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2012). Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 october 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32012L0027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, J., Manning, A. D., Steffen, W., Rose, D. B., Daniell, K., Felton, A., Garnett, S., Gilna, B., Heinsohn, R., Lindenmayer, D. B., MacDonald, B., Mills, F., Newell, B., Reid, J., Robin, L., Sherren, K., & Wade, A. (2007). Mind the sustainability gap. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22(12), 621–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.08.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, R., Luo, L., Shamsuddin, A., & Tang, Q. (2022). Corporate carbon accounting: A literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement. Accounting & Finance, 62(1), 261–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12789
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ioannou, I., Li, S. X., & Serafeim, G. (2016). The effect of target difficulty on target completion: The case of reducing carbon emissions. The Accounting Review, 91(5), 1467–1492. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51307
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ISO. (2006). ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment –Principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeswani, H. K., Wehrmeyer, W., & Mulugetta, Y. (2008). How warm is the corporate response to climate change? Evidence from Pakistan and the UK. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.569
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2008). A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: Learning from “an inconvenient truth”? Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.61
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumarasiri, J., & Jubb, C. (2016). Carbon emission risks and management accounting: Australian evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 29(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-03-2015-0040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ortiz, M., Cadarso, M., & López, L. (2020). The carbon footprint of foreign multinationals within the European Union. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(6), 1287–1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qian, W., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schaltegger, S., Zvezdov, D., Alvarez Etxeberria, I., Csutora, M., & Günther, E. (Eds.). (2015). Corporate Carbon and Climate Accounting. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27718-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Q., & Luo, L. (2016). Corporate ecological transparency: Theories and empirical evidence. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(4), 498–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-01-2015-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Guardian. (2023, January 18). Revealed: More than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by biggest provider are worthless, analysis shows. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/18/revealed-forest-carbon-offsets-biggest-provider-worthless-verra-aoe
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van der Hauwaert, E., Hoozée, S., Maussen, S., & Bruggeman, W. (2022). The impact of enabling performance measurement on managers’ autonomous work motivation and performance. Management Accounting Research, 55, 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100780
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, T. A. P., Börner, J., Sills, E. O., & Kontoleon, A. (2020). Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(39), 24188–24194. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004334117
]Search in Google Scholar
