[
Bernet, R. (2007). «Heimweh und Nostalgie». In: I. Därmann & K. Busch (eds.). Pathos. Konturen eines kulturwissenschaftlichen Grundbegriffs. Bielefeld: transcript, 103–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernet, R. (2004). Conscience et Existence. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brough, J. B. (2005). «Translator’s Introduction». In: E. Husserl. Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898-1925). Translated by J. B. Brough. Edmund Husserl Collected Works XI. Dordrecht: Kluwer, xxix–lxviii.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Casey, E. S. (1971). «Imagination: Imagining and the Image». Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 31 (4): 475-490.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cavallaro, M. (2017). «The Phenomenon of Ego-Splitting in Husserl’s Phenomenology of Pure Phantasy». Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 48 (2): 162–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Warren, N. (2014). «Towards a Phenomenological Analysis of Virtual Fictions». Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, 2 (2): 91-112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U. (2009). «On the Ontology of Fictional Characters: A Semiotic Approach». Sign Systems Studies, 37 (1/2): 82-98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferencz-Flatz, C. (2009). «Gibt es perzeptive Phantasie? Als-Ob-Bewusstsein, Widerstreit und Neutralität in Husserls Aufzeichnungen zur Bildbetrachtung». Husserl Studies, 25 (3): 235–253.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (2005). Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898-1925). Translated by J. B. Brough. Edmund Husserl Collected Works XI. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (2001 [1900/1901]). Logical Investigations. Volume 2. Edited by D. Moran. Translated by J. N. Findlay. London -New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß . Erster Teil: 1905 - 1920. Edited by I. Kern. Husserliana XIII. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1965). Erste Philosophie (1923/24): Zweiter Teil: Theorie der Phänomenologischen Reduktion. Edited by R. Boehm. Husserliana VIII. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jansen, J. (2005a). «On the Development of Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology of Imagination and Its Use for Interdisciplinary Research». Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (2): 121–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jansen, J. (2005b). «Phantasy’s Systematic Place in Husserl’s Work». In: R. Bernet, D. Welton, & G. Zavota (eds.). Edmund Husserl: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. Routledge: New York, 221-243.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Künne, W. (2007). «Fiktion ohne fiktive Gegenstände: Prolegomena zu einer Fregeanischen Theorie der Fiktion». In: M. E. Reicher (ed.). Fiktion, Wahrheit, Wirklichkeit: Philosophische Grundlagen der Literaturtheorie. Paderborn: mentis, 54–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson, J. (2006). «Emotion in Response to Art». In: J. Levinson, Contemplating Art: Essays in Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 38-55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lotz, C. (2007). «Depiction and Plastic Perception. A Critique of Husserl’s Theory of Picture Consciousness». Continental Philosophy Review, 40 (2): 171–85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marbach, E. (2013). «Towards a Phenomenological Analysis of Fictional Intentionality and Reference». International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 21 (3): 428–47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melle, U. (1990). «Objektivierende und nicht-objektivierende Akte». In: S. Ijsseling (ed.). Husserl-Ausgabe und Husserl-Forschung. Phaenomenologica 115. Boston-London: Kluwer, 35–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moran, R. (1994). «The Expression of Feeling in Imagination». The Philosophical Review, 103 (1): 75-106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ni, L. (2007). «The Problem of the Phenomenology of Feeling in Husserl and Scheler». In: K.-Y. Lau & J. J. Drummond (eds.). Husserl’s Logical Investigations in the New Century: Western and Chinese Perspectives. Phaenomenologica 55. Dordrecht: Springer, 67–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peacocke, C. (1985). «Imagination, Experience, and Possibility. A Berkley-an View Defended». In: J. Foster & H. Robinson (eds.). Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon, 19-35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radford, C. (1975). «How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?». Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 4, 67–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rozzoni, Claudio (2017). «From Abbild to Bild?: Depiction and Resemblance in Husserl’s Phenomenology». Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico, 10 (1): 117–130.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sartre, J.-P. (2004 [1940]). The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. London-New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sokolowski, R. (1970). The Formation of Husserl’s Concept of Constitution. Phaenomenologica 18. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Summa, M. (2019). «Are Fictional Emotion Genuine and Rational? Phenomenological Reflections on a Controversial Question». New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 17: .
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vendrell Ferran, Í. (2014). «Das Paradoxon Der Fiktion». In: T. Klauk & T. Köppe (eds.). Fiktionalität. Ein intersdisziplinäres Handbuch. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 313–337.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vendrell Ferran, Í. (2010). «Ästhetische Erfahrung und Quasi-Gefühle». In: V. Raspa (ed.). The Aesthetics of the Graz School. Meinong Studies 4. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 129-168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar