[
Ashton John (2007) Second Thoughts on the Fourth Gospel. In What We Have Heard from the Beginning. The Past, Present and Future of Johannine Studies, ed. Tom Thatcher, 1-18. Waco: Baylor University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barker JW (2015) John’s Use of Matthew. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauckham Richard (1998) John for Readers of Mark. In The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences, ed. Richard Bauckham, 147-71. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauckham Richard (2007) The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple: Narrative, History, and Theology in the Gospel of John. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauckham Richard (2008) The Fourth Gospel as the Testimony of the Beloved Disciple. In The Gospel of John and Christian Theology, eds. Richard Bauckham and Carl Mosser, 120-140. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauckham Richard (2017) Jesus and the Eyewitnesses. The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. Second ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barrett CK (1978) The Gospel According to St. John: An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Westminster.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barrett CK (1992) The Place of John and the Synoptics within the Early History of Christian Thought. In John and the Synoptics. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101, ed. Adelbert Denaux, 63-79. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beasley-Murray GR (1987) John. Word Biblical Commentary vol. 36. Waco: Word.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker Eve-Marie, Helen Bond, and Catrin Williams, eds. (2021) John’s Transformation of Mark. London: T&T Clark.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beutler Johannes SJ (2007) In Search of a New Synthesis. In What We Have Heard from the Beginning. The Past, Present and Future of Johannine Studies, ed. Tom Thatcher, 23-34. Waco: Baylor University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bird MF (2013) Synoptics and John. In Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. 2nd edition, eds. Joel B. Green, Jeannine K. Brown and Norman Perrin, 920-924. Downers Grove: IVP Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blomberg Craig (2001) The Historical Reliability of the Gospels. Downers Grove, InterVarsity.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blomberg Craig (2016) The Saying of Jesus in Mark: Does Mark Ever Rely on a Pre-Johannine Tradition? In The Origins of John’s Gospel, eds. S.E. Porter and H.T. Ong, 81-100. Leiden: Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borchert Gerald L (1996) John 1-11. The New American Commentary vol. 25A. Nashville: Broadman & Holman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borgen P (1987) John and the Synoptics: Can Paul Offer Help? In Tradition and Interpretation in the New Testament: Essays in Honor of E. Earle Ellis for His 60th Birthday, eds. Gerald F. Hawthorne with Otto Betz, 80-94. Grand Rapids: Eerd-mans; Tilbingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borgen P (1990) John and the Synoptics. In The Interrelations of the Gospels: A Symposium Led by M-E. Boismard, W. R. Farmer and F. Neirynck, ed. David L. Dungan, 408-37. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bowes Wiliam B (2023) The Relationship between John and the Synoptics Gospels Revisited JETS 66.1: 113-32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown Raymond E (1979) Community of the Beloved Disciple: The Life, Loves and Hates of an Individual Church in New Testament Times. NY: Paulist Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown Raymond E (2003) An Introduction to the Gospel of John. The Anchor Bible Reference Library. Edited, Updated, Introduced, and Concluded by Francis J. Moloney. New York: Double Day.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bultmann Rudolf (1971) The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Trans. G. R. Beasley-Murray, R. W. N. Hoare and J. K. Riches. Philadelphia: Westminster.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calvin John (1995) The Gospel According to St. John 1-10. Calvin’s Commentaries; trans. T. H. L. Parker; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carson DA (1981) Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel: After Dodd, What? In Gospel Perspectives, Studies of History and Tradition in the Four Gospels vol. 2, eds. R.T. France & David Wenham, 83-145. Sheffield: JSNT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carson DA (1991) The Gospel According to John. The Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carson DA, Douglas J Moo, and Leon Morris (2005) An Introduction to the New Testament. 2nd edition. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpepper R Alan (1983) Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design. Philadelphia: Fortress.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpepper R Alan (1998) The Gospel and Letters of John. Interpreting Biblical Texts. Nashville: Abingdon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dowell Thomas M (1992) Why John Rewrote the Synoptics. In John and the Synoptics. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101, ed. Adelbert Denaux, 453-57. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunn James DG (1991) Let John Be John: A Gospel for Its Time. In The Gospel and the Gospels, ed. Peter Stuhlmacher, 293-322. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunn James DG (1991) John and the Oral Tradition. In Jesus and the Oral Gospel Tradition, JSNTSupp 64, ed. Henry Wansbrough, 351-79. Sheffield: JSOT.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunn James DG (1996) John and the Synoptics as a Theological Question. In Exporing the Gospel of John: In Honor of D. Moody Smith, eds. R. Alan Culpepper and C. Clifton Black, 301-16. Lousville: Westminster John Knox.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunn James DG (2011) John’s Gospel and the Oral Gospel Tradition. In The Fourth Gospel in First Century Media Culture, eds. A. Le Donne and T. Thatcher, 157–85. London: T&T Clark.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dvorak James D (1998) The Relationship Between John and the Synoptic Gospels. JETS 41: 201-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Egger Wilhelm (1999) Methodenlehre zum Neuen Testament. Einführung in linguistische und historisch-kritische Methoden. Herder, Freiburg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Jonge Henk J (1992) The Loss of Faith in the Historicity of the Gospels. H. S. Reimarus (ca 1750) on John and the Synoptics. In John and the Synoptics, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101, ed. Adelbert Denaux; 409-21. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans C Stephen (2008) The Historical Reliability of John’s Gospel: From What Perspective Should It Be Assessed? In The Gospel of John and Christian Theology, eds. Richard Bauckham and Carl Mosse, 120-141. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fortuna Robert (1988) The Fourth Gospel and its Predecessor. Philadelphia: Fortress.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gardner-Smith P (1938) Saint John and the Synoptic Gospels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenberg Gary (2020) The Case for a Proto-Gospel: Recovering the Common Written Source Behind Mark and John. SBL 172. NY: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guthrie D (1990) New Testament Introduction. 4th ed. Downers Grove: InterVarsity.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keener Craig S (2003) The Gospel of John. A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keener Craig S (2007) Genre, Sources, and History. In What We Have Heard from the Beginning. The Past, Present and Future of Johannine Studies, ed. Tom Thatcher, 321-24. Waco: Baylor University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keener Craig S (2013) Gospel of John. In Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, eds. Joel B. Green, Jeannine K. Brown and Norman Perrin. Second edition, 419-36. Downers Grove: IVP Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koester Helmut (1982) Introduction to the New Testament. Vol. 2: History and Literature of Early Christianity. Hermeneia Foundations and Facets Series. Philadelphia: Fortress.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köstenberger Andreas J (2009) A Theology of John’s Gospel and Letters. BTNT. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köstenberger Andreas J (2012) John’s Transposition Theology: Retelling the Story of Jesus in a Different Key. In Earliest Christian History: History, Literature, and Theology. Essays from the Tyndale Fellowship in Honor of Martin Hengel, ed. by Michael F. Bird and Jason Maston, 191–226. WUNT 2/320. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köstenberger Andreas J (2013) Encountering John: The Gospel in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective. 2nd edition. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kysar R (1983) The Gospel of John in Current Research. Religious Studies Review 9: 315-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacKay ID (2004) John’s Relationship with Mark: An Analysis of John 6 in Light of Mark 6-8. WUNT 2/128. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morris Leon (1969) Studies in the Fourth Gospel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neirynck F (1977) John and the Synoptics. In L’évangile de Jean: Sources, rédaction, théologie. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 45, ed. M. De Jonge, 73–106. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neirynck F (1990) John and the Synoptics: Response to P. Borgen. In The Interrelations of the Gospels: A Symposium Led by M-E. Boismard, W. R. Farmer and F. Neirynck. ed. David L. Dungan, 438-50. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neirynck F (1992) John and the Synoptics 1975-1990. In John and the Synoptics. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101. Ed. Adelbert Denaux, 3-62. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neirynck F (1992) John and the Synoptics. Response to P. Borgen. In John and the Synoptics. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101, ed. Adelbert Denaux, 438-50. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
North Wendy ES (2007) Why Should Historical Criticism Continue to Have a Place in Johannine Studies? In What We Have Heard from the Beginning. The Past, Present and Future of Johannine Studies, ed. Tom Thatcher, 19-21. Waco: Baylor University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
North Wendy ES (2020) What John Knew and What John Wrote: A Study in John and the Synoptics. Interpreting Johannine Literature vol.2. Lanham: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Powell Mark Allan (2018) Supplement to Introducing the New Testament. A Historical, Literary, and Theological Survey (2nd ed., Grand Rapids: Baker Academics), found on http://cdn.bakerpublishinggroup.com/processed/esource-assets/files/1799/original/9.7.Comparison_of_John_and_the_Synoptic_Gospels.pdf?1524155201.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramsey Michaels J (2010) The Gospel of John. NICNT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson John (1985) The Priority of John. London: SCM.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanders J and ED Mastin (1969) The Gospel According to St. John. New York: Harper.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michael Labahn (2016) ‘Secondary Orality’ in the Gospel of John: A ‘Post-Gutenberg’ Paradigm for Understanding the Relationship between Written Gospel Texts. In The Origins of John’s Gospel, eds. S.E. Porter and H.T. Ong, 43-80. Leiden: Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramelli Ilaria (2016) John the Evangelist’s Work: An Overlooked Redaktionsgeschichtleche Theory from the Patristic Age. In The Origins of John’s Gospel, eds. S.E. Porter and H.T. Ong, 30-52. Leiden: Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (1965) The Composition and Order of the Fourth Gospel: Bultmann’s Literary Theory. Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (1980) John and the Synoptics: Some Dimensions of the Problem. NTS 26: 425–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (1982) John and the Synoptics. Biblica 63: 102-113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (1984) John and the Synoptics: Some Dimensions of the Problem. In Johannine Christianity: Essays on Its Setting, Sources, and Theology. 145-72. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (1984) The Presentation of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel.” In Johannine Christianity: Essays on Its Setting, Sources, and Theology, 175-89. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (1987) John, the Synoptics, and the Canonical Approach to Exegesis. In Tradition and Interpretation in the New Testament: Essays in Honor of E. Earle Ellis for His 60th Birthday, eds. Gerald F. Hawthorne with Otto Betz, 166-80. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans; Tiibingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (1992) The Problem of John and the Synoptics in Light of the Relation Between Apocryphal and Canonical Gospels. In John and the Synoptics. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101, ed. Adelbert Denaux, 147-62. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (1995) The Theology of the Gospel of John. New Testament Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith DM (2001) John among the Gospels. 2nd edition. Columbia: South Carolina University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tenney MC (1948) John—the Gospel of Belief: An Analytical Study of the Text. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Belle Gilbert (2007) Tradition, Formation, and the Leuven Hypothesis. In What We Have Heard from the Beginning. The Past, Present and Future of Johannine Studies, ed. Tom Thatcher, 325-34. Waco: Baylor University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verheyden J (1992) P. Gardner-Smith and ‘the Turn of the Tide.’ In John and the Synoptics. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101, ed. Adelbert Denaux, 423-52. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Windisch Hans (1926) Johannes und die Synoptiker. J. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung.
]Search in Google Scholar
