[
Zahn Theodore (1953), Introduction to the New Testament, 3. Repr. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Klock & Klock.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harnack Adolf (1987) Über den dritten Johannesbrief’, Texte und Untersuchungen 15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taeger Jens-W. Der konservative Rebell: Zum Widerstand des Diotrephes gegen den Presbyter, Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Storm Melvin R. (1993) Diotrephes: A Study of Rivalry in the Apostolic Church, Restoration Quarterly 35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauer Walter (1971) Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonsack Bernhard (1988) Der Presbyteros des dritten Briefs und der geliebte Jünger des Evangeliums nach Johannes, Zeitshrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Käsemann Ernst (1951) Ketzer und Zeuge. Zum johanneischen Verfasserproblem, Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirxhe 48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strecker Georg (1996) The Johannine Letters. Hermeneia, Philadelphia: Fortress.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Price Robert M. (1989) The Sitz-im-Leben of Third John: A New Reconstruction, Evangelical Quarterly 61.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown Raymond E. (1991) The Epistles of John. Anchor Bible 30, New York: Doubleday.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lieu Judith (1991) The Theology of the Johannine Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griffith Terry (1998) A non-polemical reading of 1 John: sin, Christology and the limits of Johannine Christianity, Tyndale Bulletin 49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Law Robert (1968) The Tests of Life: A Study of the First Epistle of St. John. Grand Rapids: Baker.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bogart John (1977) Orthodox and Heretical Perfectionism in the Johannine Community as evident in the First Epistle of John. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 33, Missoula, Montana: Scholars Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swadling Harry C. (1982) Sin and Sinlessness in I John, Scottish Journal of Theology 35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubo Sakae (1969) I John 3:9: Absolute or Habitual, Andrews University Seminary Studies 7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kotzé P. P. A. (1979) The Meaning of 1 John 3:9 with Reference to 1 John 1:8 and 10, Neotestamentica 13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ignace de la Potterie (1971) Sin Is Iniquity (I Jn 3, 4). In: Ignace de la Potterie and Stanislaus Lyonnet, The Christian Lives by the Spirit. New York: Alba House.
]Search in Google Scholar
