<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The concept of metaphysical grounding refers to a dependence relation—a relation between facts that is asymmetrical and non-causal. I aim to apply this concept to a Divine Command Theory (DCT) of moral obligations. Divine command theorists say that moral obligations arise from God’s commands. I argue that the three main views on the relation between the divine command and the obligation—causal, supervenience, and identity—do not capture all that we desire in a moral theory of obligations. After attempting to clarify metaphysical grounding in general, I articulate the distinction between what I call normative grounding and metaethical grounding. I then use this distinction to criticize Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s discussion of DCT and to highlight the compatibility of DCT with other ethical theories.</p>
</abstract>

The concept of metaphysical grounding refers to a dependence relation—a relation between facts that is asymmetrical and non-causal. I aim to apply this concept to a Divine Command Theory (DCT) of moral obligations. Divine command theorists say that moral obligations arise from God’s commands. I argue that the three main views on the relation between the divine command and the obligation—causal, supervenience, and identity—do not capture all that we desire in a moral theory of obligations. After attempting to clarify metaphysical grounding in general, I articulate the distinction between what I call normative grounding and metaethical grounding. I then use this distinction to criticize Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s discussion of DCT and to highlight the compatibility of DCT with other ethical theories.

An Exploration of Metaphysical Grounding and Divine Command Theory

Perichoresis

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"An Exploration of Metaphysical Grounding and Divine Command Theory"}

The concept of metaphysical grounding refers to a dependence relation—a relation between facts that is asymmetrical and non-causal. I aim to apply this concept...

An Exploration of Metaphysical Grounding and Divine Command Theory

Pubblicato online: 27 feb 2023

Pagine: 52 - 69

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2023-0004

Parole chiave
Metaphysical Grounding, Divine Command Theory, Moral Obligation, Dependence, Relation

© 2023 Jesse Mileo, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

An Exploration of Metaphysical Grounding and Divine Command Theory

Pubblicato online: 27 feb 2023

Pagine: 52 - 69

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2023-0004

Parole chiaveMetaphysical Grounding, Divine Command Theory, Moral Obligation, Dependence, Relation

© 2023 Jesse Mileo, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Parole chiave
Metaphysical Grounding, Divine Command Theory, Moral Obligation, Dependence, Relation