Like it! Maps as a Subject and a Springboard for discussion in social media

Andrienko G., Andrienko N., Savinov A., 2001, Choropleth maps: Classification revisited. In: “Proceedings of the 20th International Cartographic Conference – ICA 2001, August 6−10, 2001, Beijing, China”, pp. 1209−1219. Search in Google Scholar

Blom J.N., Hansen K.R., 2015, Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. “Journal of Pragmatics” No. 76, pp. 87−100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010 Search in Google Scholar

Brandeis M.W., Carrera Zamanillo M.I., 2017, Finding meaningful participation in volunteer geographic information and citizen science: a case comparison in environmental application. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 539−550, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1221779 Search in Google Scholar

Brewer C.A., Pickle L., 2002, Evaluation of methods for classifying epidemiological data on choropleth maps in series. “Annals of the Association of American Geographers” Vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 662−681, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00310 Search in Google Scholar

Buckingham W.R., Dennis S.F. jr., 2009, Cartographies of participation: How the changing natures of cartography has opened community and cartographer collaboration. “Cartographic Perspectives” No. 64, pp. 55−61, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14714/CP64.150 Search in Google Scholar

Cosgrove D.E., della Dora V., 2005, Mapping Global War: Los Angeles, the Pacific, and Charles Owens’s pictorial cartography. “Annals of the Association of American Geographers” Vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 373−390, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00465.x Search in Google Scholar

Crampton J. W., 2001, Maps as social constructions: power, communication and visualization. “Progress in Human Geography” Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 235−252, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201678580494 Search in Google Scholar

Czepkiewicz M., Jankowski P., Młodkowski M., 2017, Geo-questionnaires in urban planning: recruitment methods, participant engagement, and data quality. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 551−567, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1230520 Search in Google Scholar

Dodge M., Kitchin R., 2011, Mapping experience: crowdsourcing cartography. “Environment and Planning A”, Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 19−36, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a44484 Search in Google Scholar

Faliszewska A., 2012, Badania czytelności kartograficznych anamorfoz powierzchni. “Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny” T. 44, nr 3, pp. 225−238. Search in Google Scholar

Field K., 2012, Mapping the London 2012 Olympics. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 281–296, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/0008704112Z.00000000033 Search in Google Scholar

Field K., 2014, The cacophony of cartography. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1−10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/0008704114Z.000000000120 Search in Google Scholar

Green D.R., 1999, Journalistic cartography: good or bad? A debatable point. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 141−153, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/caj.1999.36.2.141 Search in Google Scholar

Kent A., 2017, Trust me, I’m a cartographer: post-truth and the problem of acritical cartography. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 193−195, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2017.1376489 Search in Google Scholar

Kent A., Vujakovic P., 2017, Introduction. In: A.J. Kent, P. Vujakovic (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mapping and Cartography, pp. 1−5. Search in Google Scholar

Kraak M.-J., 2011, Is there a need for neo-cartography?. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 73−78, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1559/1523040638273 Search in Google Scholar

Liu S.B., Palen L., 2010, The new cartographers: crisis map mashups and the emergence of neogeographic practice. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 69−90, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1559/152304010790588098 Search in Google Scholar

Markowska A., Korycka-Skorupa J., 2015, An evaluation of GIS tools for generating area cartograms. “Polish Cartographical Review” Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 19−29, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pcr-2015-0002 Search in Google Scholar

McCartney E.A., 2015, Crowdsourcing the national map. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 54−57, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2015.1059187 Search in Google Scholar

Muehlenhaus I., 2012, If looks could kill: the impact of different rhetorical styles on persuasive geo-communication. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 361−375, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000032 Search in Google Scholar

Muehlenhaus I., 2014, Going viral: the look of online persuasive maps. “Cartographica” Vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 18−34, DOI: https://doi/org/10.3138/carto.49.1.1830 Search in Google Scholar

Pánek J., 2016, From mental maps to geoparticipation. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 300−307, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862 Search in Google Scholar

Robinson A.C., 2019, Elements of viral cartography. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 293−310, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2018.1484304 Search in Google Scholar

Sirko M., 1999, Zarys historii kartografii, Lublin. Search in Google Scholar

Slocum T.A., McMaster R.B., Kessler F.C., Howard H.H., 2009, Thematic cartography and geovisualization. Search in Google Scholar

Sun H., Li Z., 2010, Effectiveness of cartogram for the representation of spatial data. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 12−21, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/000870409X12525737905169 Search in Google Scholar

Tomaszewska M., 2009, Sposób ujęcia danych a poprawność map opracowanych metodą kartogramu. “Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny” T. 41, no. 3, pp. 209−220. Search in Google Scholar