[
Ali, A. J., Fuenzalida, J., Gómez, M., & Williams, M. J. (2021). Four lenses on people management in the public sector: An evidence review and synthesis. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(2), 335-366. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grab003
10.1093/oxrep/grab003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of Human Agency through Collective Efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
10.1111/1467-8721.00064
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Battaglio Jr, R.P., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N. & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral public administration ad fontes: A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 304-320. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12994
10.1111/puar.12994
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beal, D., J. Robin Cohen, M. J. Burke, & C. L. McLendon. (2003). Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-analytic Clarification of Construct Relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Behavioural Insights Team. (2014). EAST: Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights! Behavioural Insight Team, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhanot, S.P. & Linos, E. (2020). Behavioral public administration: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 168-171. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13129
10.1111/puar.13129
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bryson, J. M. & B. George (2020). Strategic management in public administration. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. http://doi.org/10.1093/acre-fore/9780190228637.013.1396
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Camerer, C.F. & Loewenstein, G. (2011). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future. In Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University Press, 3-52. http://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829118-004
10.1515/9781400829118-004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carless, S. A., & C. De Paola. (2000). The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams. Small Group Research, 31(1), 71–88. http://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100104
10.1177/104649640003100104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cartwright, D. & Zander, A. (1968). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Harper + Row.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, R.L., Maki, J.A. & Morrill, M. S. (2014). Can simple informational nudges increase employee participation in a 401 (k) plan? Southern Economic Journal, 80(3), 677-701. http://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-2012.199
10.4284/0038-4038-2012.199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Congdon, W.J. & Shankar, M. (2018). The role of behavioral economics in evidence-based policymaking. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 678(1), 81-92. http://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218766268
10.1177/0002716218766268
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Metcalfe, R. & Vlaev, I. (2012). Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 264-277. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.009
10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elyousfi, F., Anand, A. & Dalmasso, A. (2021). Impact of e-leadership and team dynamics on virtual team performance in a public organization. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(5), 508-528. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2020-0218
10.1108/IJPSM-08-2020-0218
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fu, J. S. (2020). Understanding the Internal and External Communicative Drivers of Organizational Innovativeness. Communication Research, http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220981299
10.1177/0093650220981299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friolina, D.G., Sudarsih, S., Endhiarto, T. & Musmedi, D. P. (2017). Do Competence, Communication, And Commitment Affect The Civil Servants Performance? International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 6(9), 211-215
]Search in Google Scholar
[
George, B. & Desmidt, S. (2018). Strategic-decision quality in public organizations: An information processing perspective. Administration and Society, 50(1), 131-156. http://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716647153
10.1177/0095399716647153
]Search in Google Scholar
[
George, B. (2020). Behavioral public strategy, Behavioural Public Policy, 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.30
10.1017/bpp.2020.30
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grissom, J. A. (2014). Is discord detrimental? Using institutional variation to identify the impact of public governing board conflict on outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 289–315. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus042
10.1093/jopart/mus042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hampton, S. & Adams, R. (2018). Behavioural economics vs social practice theory: Perspectives from inside the United Kingdom government. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, 214-224. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.023
10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled Interpersonal Communication: Research, Theory and Practice. Routledge, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2015). Public value and political astuteness in the work of public managers: The art of the possible. Public Administration, 93(1), 195-211. http://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12125
10.1111/padm.12125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hassan, S., & Rohrbaugh, J. (2012). Variability in the organizational climate of government offices and affective organizational commitment. Public Management Review, 14(5), 563-584. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.642568
10.1080/14719037.2011.642568
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hossan, C., Dixon, C. & Brown, D. (2013). Impact of group dynamics on eservice implementation: A qualitative analysis of Australian public sector organisational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(5), 853-873. http://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2012-0097
10.1108/JOCM-07-2012-0097
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, R. (2013). Communication in the real world: An introduction to communication studies. The Saylor Foundation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelvin-Iloafu, L. E. (2016). The role of effective communication in strategic management of organizations. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(12), 93-99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keyton, J., Beck, S.J., & Asbury, M. B. (2010). Macro-cognition: a communication perspective. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(4), 272-286. http://doi.org/10.1080/14639221003729136
10.1080/14639221003729136
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J. & Steijn, B. (2010). Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes. Administration & Society, 42(2), 193-221. http://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710362716
10.1177/0095399710362716
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kormos, C., Gifford, R. & Brown, E. (2015). The influence of descriptive social norm information on sustainable transportation behavior: A field experiment. Environment and Behavior, 47(5), 479-501. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513520416
10.1177/0013916513520416
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143-153. http://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
10.1177/001872674700100103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macgowan, M. J. (2009). Group dynamics: Practice intervention. In Encyclopedia of Social Work. New York, Oxford University Press, 279-287.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michailova, S., & Sidorova, E. (2011). From group-based work to organisational learning: the role of communication forms and knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9, 73-83. http://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2011.4
10.1057/kmrp.2011.4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitu, N. E. (2021). Importance of Communication in Public Administration. Revista de Stiinte Politice, 69, 134-145.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mullins, L. (2010). Management and Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education, Essex.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mutonyi, B.R., Slåtten, T. & Lien, G. (2020a). Organizational climate and creative performance in the public sector. European Business Review, 32(4), 615-631. http://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-02-2019-0021
10.1108/EBR-02-2019-0021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mutonyi, B.R., Slåtten, T. & Lien, G. (2020b). Empowering leadership, work group cohesiveness, individual learning orientation and individual innovative behaviour in the public sector: empirical evidence from Norway. International Journal of Public Leadership, 16(2), 175-197. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-07-2019-0045
10.1108/IJPL-07-2019-0045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliver, A. (2013). Behavioural public policy. Cambridge University Press, Campridge.10.1017/CBO9781107337190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patterson, M., West, M., Shackleton, V., Dawson, J., Lawthom, R., & Matlis, S. (2005). Validating the Organizational Climate Measure: Links to Managerial Practices, Productivity and Innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379-408. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.312
10.1002/job.312
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pokharel, M. P., & Choi, S. O. (2015). Exploring the relationships between the learning organization and organizational performance. Management Research Review, 38(2), 126-148. http://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0033
10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Powell, T.C., Lovallo, D. & Fox, C.R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1369-1386. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.968
10.1002/smj.968
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stake, R.E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, California.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tekleab, A., Quigley, N., & Tesluk, P. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34(2,) 170-205. http://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108331218
10.1177/1059601108331218
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thaler, R.H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thayer, A. L., Petruzzelli, A., & McClurg, C. E. (2018). Addressing the paradox of the team innovation process: A review and practical considerations. American Psychologist, 73(4), 363. http://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000310
10.1037/amp0000310
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van der Voet, J., & Steijn, B. (2021). Team innovation through collaboration: How visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1275-1294. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1743344
10.1080/14719037.2020.1743344
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vlaev, I., King, D., Darzi, A., & Dolan, P. (2019). Changing health behaviors using financial incentives: a review from behavioral economics. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1-9.10.1186/s12889-019-7407-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wakefield, J.R., Bowe, M., Kellezi, B., McNamara, N. & Stevenson, C. (2019). When groups help and when groups harm: Origins, developments, and future directions of the “Social Cure” perspective of group dynamics. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(3). http://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12440
10.1111/spc3.12440
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warrens, M.J. (2015). Five ways to look at Cohen’s kappa”. Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 5(4), 1-7. http://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0487.1000197
10.4172/2161-0487.1000197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, B. E. (2015). The science of public administration: Problems, presumptions, progress, and possibilities. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 795-805. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12468.10.1111/puar.12468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zainun, N.F.H., Johari, J. & Adnan, Z. (2020). Technos-tress and Commitment to Change: The Moderating Role of Internal Communication. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(15), 1327-1339. http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1672180.10.1080/01900692.2019.1672180
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2010). Organizational climate and its effects on organizational variables: An empirical study. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 2(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-07-2019-0045, https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-02-2019-0021
10.1108/IJPL-07-2019-0045
]Search in Google Scholar
