[Al-Najjar, B. (1996). Total quality maintenance. An approach for continuous reduction in costs of quality products. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 2(3), 4-20, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/1355251961013041310.1108/13552519610130413]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Najjar, B. (1997). Condition-based maintenance: Selection and improvement of a cost-effective vibration-based policy in rolling element bearings. Doctoral thesis, ISSN 0280-722X, ISRN LUTMDN/TMIO-1006-SE, ISBN 91-628-2545-X, Lund University, Inst. of Industrial Engineering, Sweden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Najjar, B. (2007). The lack of maintenance and not maintenance which costs: A model to describe and quantify the impact of vibration-based maintenance on company's business. International Journal of Production Economics, 107(1), 260–273, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.09.00510.1016/j.ijpe.2006.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Najjar, B. (2012). On establishing cost-effective condition-based maintenance: Exemplified for vibration-based maintenance in case companies. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 18(4), 401 – 416, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/1355251121128156110.1108/13552511211281561]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Najjar, B., & Alsyouf, I. (2000). Improving effectiveness of manufacturing systems using total quality maintenance. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11(4), 267-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/0957606001032639310.1108/09576060010326393]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Najjar, B., & Alsyouf, I. (2003). Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. Journal of Production Economics, 83(3), 81–96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-810.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Najjar, B., & Alsyouf, I. (2004). Enhancing a company's profitability and competitiveness using integrated vibration-based maintenance: a case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 157(3), 643–657, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00258-310.1016/S0377-2217(03)00258-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Alsyouf, I. (2004). Cost effective maintenance for competitive advantages. Ph.D. dissertation (Terotechnology), School of Industrial Engineering, Vaxjo University Press, Acta Wexionensia, Vaxjo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arts, R.H.P.M., Knapp, G.M.J., & Lawrence, M. (1998). Some aspects of measuring maintenance performance in the process industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 4(1), 6-11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1355251981020152010.1108/13552519810201520]Search in Google Scholar
[Aslani, A., & Aslani, F. (2012). Application of Fuzzy AHP Approach to Selection of Organizational Structure with Consideration to Contextual Dimensions. Organizacija, 45(5), 246 - 254, http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10051-012-0025-110.2478/v10051-012-0025-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Azadivar, F., & Shu, V. (1999). Maintenance policy selection for JIT production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 37(16), 3725-3738, http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/00207549919001310.1080/002075499190013]Search in Google Scholar
[Backlund, F., & Akersten, P.A. (2003). RCM introduction: process and requirements management aspects. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 9(3), 250 – 264, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/1355251031049370110.1108/13552510310493701]Search in Google Scholar
[Bayazit, O. (2005). Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(7), 808-819, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/1741038051062620410.1108/17410380510626204]Search in Google Scholar
[Bevilacqua, M., & Braglia, M. (2000) The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 70(1), 71-83, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00047-810.1016/S0951-8320(00)00047-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertolini, M., & Bevilacqua, M. (2006). A combined goal program-ming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91(7), 839–848, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.08.00610.1016/j.ress.2005.08.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Dekker, R. (1996). Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 51(3), 229-240, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00076-310.1016/0951-8320(95)00076-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunn, R. (1987). Advanced maintenance technologies. Plant Engineering, 40(12), 80-2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gits, C.W. (1992). Design of maintenance concepts. International Journal of Production Economics, 24(3), 217-26, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(92)90133-R10.1016/0925-5273(92)90133-R]Search in Google Scholar
[Gits, C.W. (1994). Structuring maintenance control systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(7), 5-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/0144357941006212110.1108/01443579410062121]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaca, C., Viles, E., Paipa-Galeano, L., & Santos, J. (2014). Learning 5S principles from Japanese best practitioners: case studies of five manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0 0207543.2013.878481]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaca, C., Viles, E., Mateo, R., & Santos, J. (2012). Components of sustainable improvement systems: theory and practice. The TQM Journal, 24(2), 142-154, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/1754273121121508010.1108/17542731211215080]Search in Google Scholar
[Jardine, A.K.S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–510, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ymssp.2005.09.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Karapetrovic, S,. & Rosenbloom, E.S. (1999). A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 119(3), 704-718, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00334-810.1016/S0377-2217(98)00334-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Lane, E.F., & Verdini, W.A. (1989). A consistency test for AHP decision makers. Decision Sciences, 20(3), 575-590, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01568.x10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01568.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ljungberg, O. (1998). Measurement of overall equipment effectiveness as a basis for TPM activities. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18(5), 495-507, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/0144357981020633410.1108/01443579810206334]Search in Google Scholar
[Luxhoj, J., Riis, J., & Thorsteinsson, U. (1997). Trends and perspectives in industrial maintenance management. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 16(6), 437-53, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0278-6125(97)81701-310.1016/S0278-6125(97)81701-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Löfsten, H. (1999). Management of industrial maintenance-economic evaluation of maintenance policies. International Journal of Operations &Production Management, 19(7), 716-737, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/0144357991027168310.1108/01443579910271683]Search in Google Scholar
[Maletič, D., Maletič, M., Al-Najjar, B., & Gomišček, B. (2014). The role of maintenance in improving company's competitiveness and profitability: A case study in a textile company. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(4), 441–456, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2013-003310.1108/JMTM-04-2013-0033]Search in Google Scholar
[Mann, L., Saxena, A., & Knapp, G. (1995). Statistical-based or condition-based preventive maintenance? Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 1(1), 46-59, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/13552519510083156]Search in Google Scholar
[Moubray, J. (1997). Reliability-centered maintenance, 2nd ed. New York: Industrial Press Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Muchiri, P., Pintelon, L., Gelders, L., & Martin, H. (2011). Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 295 - 302, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.03910.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.039]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, C.K. (1993). Limits on the analytic hierarchy process from its consistency index. European Journal of Operational Research, 65(1), 138-139, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90148-G10.1016/0377-2217(93)90148-G]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakajima, S. (1989). TPM Development Program: Implementing Total Productive Maintenance, Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakajima, S. (1988). TPM: Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance, Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowlan, F.S., & Heap, H.F. (1978). Reliability Centered Maintenance. San Fransisco: United Airlines Publications.10.21236/ADA066579]Search in Google Scholar
[Okumura, S., & Okino, N. (2003). A maintenance policy selection method for a critical single-unit item in each workstation composing a FMS with CBM optimization. International Journal of COMADEM, 6(2), 3-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parida, A., & Chattopadhyay, G. (2007). Development of a multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM). Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 13(3), 241-258, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/1355251071078027610.1108/13552510710780276]Search in Google Scholar
[Pintelon, L., & Parodi, A. (2008). Maintenance: an evolutionary perspective. In: Kobbacy, K.A.H., & Murthy, D.N.P (Eds), Complex System Maintenance Handbook, London: Springer, pp. 21-48.10.1007/978-1-84800-011-7_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Reineke, D., Murdock, W., Pohl, E., & Rehmert, I. (1999). Improving Availability and Cost Performance for Complex Systems with Preventive Maintenance. Proceedings of the10.1109/RAMS.1999.744148]Search in Google Scholar
[Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804]Search in Google Scholar
[Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98, http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.01759010.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharabi, M. (2014). Today's quality is tomorrow's reputation (and the following day's business success). Total Quality Management, 25(3-4), 183 – 197, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1 4783363.2013.858877]Search in Google Scholar
[Talib, F., Rahman, Z., & Qureshi, M.N. (2011). Prioritising the practices of total quality management: An analytic hierarchy process analysis for the service industries. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(12), 1331-1351, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.62519210.1080/14783363.2011.625192]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsang, A.H.C., & Chan, P.K., (2000). TPM implementation in China: a case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(2), 144 – 157, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/0265671001030455510.1108/02656710010304555]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, L., Chu, J. and Wu, J. (2007). Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 107(1), 151-63, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.00510.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Waeyenbergh, G., & Pintelon, L. (2002). A framework for maintenance concept development. International Journal of Production Economics, 77(3), 299–313, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00156-610.1016/S0925-5273(01)00156-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaim, S., Turkyilmaz, A., Acar, M.F., Al-Turki, U., & Demirel, O.F. (2012). Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 18(1), 16 – 29, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/1355251121122616610.1108/13552511211226166]Search in Google Scholar