This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C., Rebelo, M., Parkin, D. M., Forman, D., & Bray, F. (2015). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer, 136(5), E359–E386. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210.FerlayJ.SoerjomataramI.DikshitR.EserS.MathersC.RebeloM.ParkinD. M.FormanD.BrayF.2015Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012Int. J. Cancer1365E359E38610.1002/ijc.2921025220842Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2018). Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin., 68, 7–30.SiegelR. L.MillerK. D.JemalA.2018Cancer statisticsCA Cancer J. Clin.6873010.3322/caac.2144229313949Search in Google Scholar
Brem, R. F., Petrovitch, I., Rapelyea, J. A., Young, H., Teal, C., & Kelly, T. (2007). Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer – a comparative study. Breast J., 13(5), 465–469. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00466.x.BremR. F.PetrovitchI.RapelyeaJ. A.YoungH.TealC.KellyT.2007Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer – a comparative studyBreast J.13546546910.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00466.x17760667Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bushberg, J. T., Seibert, J. A., Leidholdt, E. M. Jr., Boone, J. M., & Goldschmidt, E. J. (2003). The essential physics of medical imaging. Med. Phys., 30, 1936.BushbergJ. T.SeibertJ. A.LeidholdtE. M. Jr.BooneJ. M.GoldschmidtE. J.2003The essential physics of medical imagingMed. Phys.30193610.1118/1.1585033Search in Google Scholar
Lewin, J. M., D’Orsi, C. J., Hendrick, R. E., Moss, L. J., Isaacs, P. K., Karellas, A., & Cutter, G. R. (2002). Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol., 179(3), 671–677. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.3.1790671.LewinJ. M.D’OrsiC. J.HendrickR. E.MossL. J.IsaacsP. K.KarellasA.CutterG. R.2002Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancerAm. J. Roentgenol.179367167710.2214/ajr.179.3.179067112185042Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Obenauer, S., Luftner-Nagel, S., von Heyden, D., Munzel, U., Baum, F., & Grabbe, E. (2002). Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur. Radiol., 12(7), 1697–1702. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-001-1269-y.ObenauerS.Luftner-NagelS.von HeydenD.MunzelU.BaumF.GrabbeE.2002Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesionsEur. Radiol.1271697170210.1007/s00330-001-1269-y12111060Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Niklason, L. T., Christian, B. T., Niklason, L. E., Kopans, D. B., Castleberry, D. E., Opsahl-Ong, B. H., Landberg, C. E., Slanetz, P. J., Giardino, A. A., Moore, R., Albagli, D., DeJule, M. C., Fitzgerald, P. F., Fobare, D. F., Giambattista, B. W., Kwasnick, R. F., Liu, J., Lubowski, S. J., Possin, G. E., Richotte, J. F., Wei, C. Y., & Wirth, R. F. (1997). Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology, 205(2), 399–406. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620.NiklasonL. T.ChristianB. T.NiklasonL. E.KopansD. B.CastleberryD. E.Opsahl-OngB. H.LandbergC. E.SlanetzP. J.GiardinoA. A.MooreR.AlbagliD.DeJuleM. C.FitzgeraldP. F.FobareD. F.GiambattistaB. W.KwasnickR. F.LiuJ.LubowskiS. J.PossinG. E.RichotteJ. F.WeiC. Y.WirthR. F.1997Digital tomosynthesis in breast imagingRadiology205239940610.1148/radiology.205.2.93566209356620Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Skaane, P., Bandos, A. I., Gullien, R., Eben, E. B., Ekseth, U., Haakenaasen, U., Izadi, M., Jebsen, I. N., Jahr, G., Krager, M., Niklason, L. T., Hofvind, S., & Gur, D. (2013). Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology, 267(1), 47–56. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12121373.SkaaneP.BandosA. I.GullienR.EbenE. B.EksethU.HaakenaasenU.IzadiM.JebsenI. N.JahrG.KragerM.NiklasonL. T.HofvindS.GurD.2013Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programRadiology2671475610.1148/radiol.1212137323297332Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rafferty, E. A., Park, J. M., Philpotts, L. E., Poplack, S. P., Sumkin, J. H., Halpern, E. F., & Niklason, L. T. (2013). Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: Results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology, 266(1), 104–113. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120674.RaffertyE. A.ParkJ. M.PhilpottsL. E.PoplackS. P.SumkinJ. H.HalpernE. F.NiklasonL. T.2013Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: Results of a multicenter, multireader trialRadiology266110411310.1148/radiol.12120674541094723169790Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alyassin, A. M., Maqsoud, H. A., Mashat, A. M., Al-Mohr, A. -S., & Abdulwajid, S. (2013). Feasibility study of gamma-ray medical radiography. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 72, 16–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.apraiso.2012.11.001.AlyassinA. M.MaqsoudH. A.MashatA. M.Al-MohrA. -S.AbdulwajidS.2013Feasibility study of gamma-ray medical radiographyAppl. Radiat. Isot.72162910.1016/j.apraiso.2012.11.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Taha, E. E. M., & Alyassin, A. M. A. (2016). Feasibility of a novel gamma radiography mammo system. Insights Med. Phys., 1, 1–8.TahaE. E. M.AlyassinA. M. A.2016Feasibility of a novel gamma radiography mammo systemInsights Med. Phys.118Search in Google Scholar
Wagenaar, D. J., Chowdhury, S., Engdahl, J. C., & Burckhardt, D. D. (2003). Planar image quality comparison between a CdZnTe prototype and a standard NaI(Tl) gamma camera. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 505(1/2), 586–589. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01153-7.WagenaarD. J.ChowdhuryS.EngdahlJ. C.BurckhardtD. D.2003Planar image quality comparison between a CdZnTe prototype and a standard NaI(Tl) gamma cameraNucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip.5051/258658910.1016/S0168-9002(03)01153-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Taillefer, R. (2021). Scintillation cameras: A new clinical era has come. J. Nucl. Cardiol. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-021-02660-4.TailleferR.2021Scintillation cameras: A new clinical era has comeJ. Nucl. Cardiol.10.1007/s12350-021-02660-434254249Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Green, F. H., Veale, M. C., Wilson, M. D., Seller, P., Scuffham, J., & Pani, S. (2016). Scatter free imaging for the improvement of breast cancer detection in mammography. Phys. Med. Biol., 61(20), 7246–7262. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/20/7246.GreenF. H.VealeM. C.WilsonM. D.SellerP.ScuffhamJ.PaniS.2016Scatter free imaging for the improvement of breast cancer detection in mammographyPhys. Med. Biol.61207246726210.1088/0031-9155/61/20/724627694716Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Russo, P. (2002). Hybrid semiconductor pixel detectors for low- and medium-energy X- and gamma-ray single photon imaging using the Medipix Read-Out Chip. In J. P. Hornak (Ed.), Encyclopedia of imaging science and technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.RussoP.2002Hybrid semiconductor pixel detectors for low- and medium-energy X- and gamma-ray single photon imaging using the Medipix Read-Out ChipInHornakJ. P.(Ed.),Encyclopedia of imaging science and technologyNew YorkJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471443395.img115Search in Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, K. -F. G., Giersch, J., & Anton, G. (2004). How good is better? A comparison between the Medipix1 and the Medipix2 chip using mammographic phantoms. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 531(1/2), 246–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2004.06.012.PfeifferK. -F. G.GierschJ.AntonG.2004How good is better? A comparison between the Medipix1 and the Medipix2 chip using mammographic phantomsNucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip.5311/224625010.1016/j.nima.2004.06.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Manuilskiy, A., Norlin, B., Nilsson, H. -E., & Fröjdh, C. (2004). Spectroscopy applications for the Medipix photon counting X-ray system. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 531(1/2), 251–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2004.06.013.ManuilskiyA.NorlinB.NilssonH. -E.FröjdhC.2004Spectroscopy applications for the Medipix photon counting X-ray systemNucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip.5311/225125710.1016/j.nima.2004.06.013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Procz, S., Lubke, J., Zwerger, A., & Fauler, A. (2010). Energy selective X-ray imaging with Medipix. In IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference 2010, pp. 3846–3851. DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874533.ProczS.LubkeJ.ZwergerA.FaulerA.2010Energy selective X-ray imaging with MedipixInIEEE Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference 20103846385110.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874533Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yang, Q., Wang, X., Kuang, Z., Zhang, Ch., Yang, Y., & Du, J. (2021). Evaluation of two SiPM arrays for depth-encoding PET detectors based on dual-ended readout. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci., 5(3), 315–321. DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3008710.YangQ.WangX.KuangZ.ZhangCh.YangY.DuJ.2021Evaluation of two SiPM arrays for depth-encoding PET detectors based on dual-ended readoutIEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci.5331532110.1109/TRPMS.2020.3008710Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McLelland, R., Hendrick, R. E., Zinninger, M. D., & Wilcox, P. A. (1991). The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program. Am. J. Roentgenol., 157(3), 473–479. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.157.3.1872231.McLellandR.HendrickR. E.ZinningerM. D.WilcoxP. A.1991The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation ProgramAm. J. Roentgenol.157347347910.2214/ajr.157.3.18722311872231Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Basunia, M. S. (2006). Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 237. Nucl. Data Sheets, 107, 2323–2422.BasuniaM. S.2006Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 237Nucl. Data Sheets1072323242210.1016/j.nds.2006.07.001Search in Google Scholar
Jan, S., Santin, G., Strul, D., Staelens, S., Assie, K., Autret, D., Avner, S., Barbier, R., Bardies, M., Bloomfield, P. M., Brasse, D., Breton, V., Bruyndonckx, P., Buvat, I., Chatziioannou, A. F., Choi, Y., Chung, Y. H., Comtat, C., Donnarieix, D., Ferrer, L., Glick, S. J., Groiselle, C. J., Guez, D., Honore, P. -F., Kerhoas-Cavata, S., Kirov, A. S., Kohli, V., Koole, M., Krieguer, M., van der Laan, D. J., Lamare, F., Largeron, G., Lartizien, C., Lazaro, D., Maas, M. C., Maigne, L., Mayet, F., Melot, F., Merheb, C., Pennacchio, E., Perez, J., Pietrzyk, U., Rannou, F. R., Rey, M., Schaart, D. R., Schmidtlein, C. R., Simon, L., Song, T. Y., Vieira, J. -M., Visvikis, D., Van de Walle, R., Wieers, E., & Morel, C. (2004). GATE -Geant4 application for tomographic emission: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. Phys. Med. Biol., 49(19), 4543–4561.JanS.SantinG.StrulD.StaelensS.AssieK.AutretD.AvnerS.BarbierR.BardiesM.BloomfieldP. M.BrasseD.BretonV.BruyndonckxP.BuvatI.ChatziioannouA. F.ChoiY.ChungY. H.ComtatC.DonnarieixD.FerrerL.GlickS. J.GroiselleC. J.GuezD.HonoreP. -F.Kerhoas-CavataS.KirovA. S.KohliV.KooleM.KrieguerM.van der LaanD. J.LamareF.LargeronG.LartizienC.LazaroD.MaasM. C.MaigneL.MayetF.MelotF.MerhebC.PennacchioE.PerezJ.PietrzykU.RannouF. R.ReyM.SchaartD. R.SchmidtleinC. R.SimonL.SongT. Y.VieiraJ. -M.VisvikisD.Van de WalleR.WieersE.MorelC.2004GATE -Geant4 application for tomographic emission: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECTPhys. Med. Biol.49194543456110.1088/0031-9155/49/19/007326738315552416Search in Google Scholar