1. bookVolume 14 (2021): Edizione 1 (June 2021)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1338-4309
Prima pubblicazione
03 Aug 2009
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia

Pubblicato online: 12 May 2021
Volume & Edizione: Volume 14 (2021) - Edizione 1 (June 2021)
Pagine: 261 - 283
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1338-4309
Prima pubblicazione
03 Aug 2009
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Aboal, Diego et al. 2018. “How Effective and Innovation Support Programs to Stimulate Innovation ? Evidence grom Paraguay.” Documentos de Trabajo LACEA 017233. Available at https://www.bcu.gub.uy/Comunicaciones/Jornadas%20de%20Economa/Diego_Aboal.pdf (last accessed 4. April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Albors-Garrigos, Jose and Rosa Rodrigues Barrera. 2011. “Impact of Public Funding on a Firm’s Innovation Performance: Analysis of Internal and External Moderating Factors.” International Journal of Innovation Management 15(6), 1297 – 1322. Search in Google Scholar

Alvarez, Roberto, Bravo, Claudio and Zahler, Andrés. 2013. “Impact Evaluation of Innovation Programs in the Chilean Services Sector.” Documento de trabajo / Working Paper No 2013 (SS-IP)-02. Available at http://www.cinve.org.uy/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DT-N%C2%B0-2013_SS-IP_-02-Zahler-U-Diego-Portales.pdf (last accessed 4. April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” Princeton University Press: 219 – 236.10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_13 Search in Google Scholar

Bondonio, Danielle et al. 2015. “Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Enterprise Support Programmes: Evidence from a Decade of Subsidies to Italian Firm.” ERSA conference papers, European Regional Science Association. Available at https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa15p1619.html (last accessed 4. April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Bronzini, Rafaello and Paolo Piselli. 2009. “Determinants of Long-Run Regional Productivity with Geographic Spillovers: The Role of R&D, Human Capital and Public Infrastructure.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 2(39), 187 – 199. Search in Google Scholar

Cerar Godec, Lucia and Jože Benčina. 2018. “Impact of Active Labour Market Policy Programs on Employment in the EU During the Crisis.” Central European Public Administration Review 16(1), 31 – 50. Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Joonwhan and Jaegul Lee. 2017. “Repairing the R&D Market Failure: Public R&D Subsidy and the Composition of Private R&D.” Research Policy 46(8), 1465 – 1478. Search in Google Scholar

Czarnitzki, Dirk and Cindy Lopes Bento. 2011. “Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Cohesion Policy: Examples from Support to Innovation and Research.” Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Work package 2 Final Report. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/information/evaluations/pdf/impact/ciewp2_final.pdf (last accessed DATE). Search in Google Scholar

Czarnitzki, Dirk, Bernd Ebersberger and Andreas Fier. 2007. “The Relationship between R&D Collaboration, Subsidies and R&D Performance: Empirical Evidence from Finland and Germany.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(7), 1347 – 1366. Search in Google Scholar

Czarnitzki, Dirk, Petr Hanel and Julio Miguel Rosa. 2011. “Evaluating the Impact of R&D Tax Credits on Innovation: A Microeconomic Study on Canadian Firms.” Research Policy 20(2), 217 – 229. Search in Google Scholar

Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 2017. “The Impact of Public Support for Innovation on Firm Outcomes.” Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/604841/innovation-public-support-impact-report-2017.pdf (last accessed 4. April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

D’Este, Pablo et al. 2012. “What Hampers Innovation ? Revealed Barriers versus Deterring Barriers.” Research Policy 41(2), 483 – 488. Search in Google Scholar

Dodgston, Mark and John Bessant. 1996. Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach. London: International Thomson Business Press. Search in Google Scholar

Dodgston, Mark, D. Gann and A. Satter. 2005. Think, Play, Do: Technology, Innovation and Organization. London: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Dodgston, Mark et al. 2011. “System Thinking, Market Failure, and the Development of Innovation Policy: The Case of Australia.” Reserach Policy 40(9), 1145 – 1156. Search in Google Scholar

Ďurčeková, Ina. 2020. Verejná podpora podnikových inovácií a jej účinnosť. Dizertačná práca. Banská Bystrica: Ekonomická fakulta UMB v Banskej Bystrici. Search in Google Scholar

Dvouletý, Ondřej and Ivana Blažkov. 2019. “Assessing the Microeconomic Effect of Public Subsidies on the Performance of Firms in the Czech Food Processing Industry: A Counterfactual Impact Evaluation.” Agribusiness 35(3), 394 – 422.10.1002/agr.21582 Search in Google Scholar

Edquist, Charles. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter. Search in Google Scholar

Edquist, Charles and Susana Borrás. 2013. “The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(8), 1513 – 1522. Search in Google Scholar

Eggink, Maria. 2013. “The Components of Innovation System: A Conceptual Innovation System Framework.” Journal of Innovation and Business Best Practices 1, 1 – 12. Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2013. Design and Commissioning of Counterfactual Impact Evaluations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2017. Community Innovation Survey 2014. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20170124-2 (last accessed 4. April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2020. “R&D Expenditure: Eurostat Statistics Explained.” Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=R_%26_D_expenditure (last accessed 4. April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Falk, Rahel. 2007. “Measuring the Effects of Public Support Schemes on Firms’ Innovation Activities: Survey Evidence from Austria.” Research Policy 36(5), 665 – 679. Search in Google Scholar

Government Office of the Slovak Republic. 2015. Hodnotenie vybraných intervencií ŠF a KF využitím metód Counterfactual Impact Evaluation. Záverečná správa. Úrad vlády SR. Centrálny koordinačný orgán. Available at http://www.nsrr.sk/download.php?FNAME=1444742081.upl&ANAME=Hodnotenie+vy-bran%C3%BDch+intervenci%C3%AD+%C5%A0F+a+KF+vyu%C5%BE-it%C3%ADm+met%C3%B3d+CIE+-+Z%C3%A1vere%C4%8D-n%C3%A1+spr%C3%A1va.pdf (last accessed 24 March 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Herrera, Liliana and Heijs, Joost. 2004. “The distribution of R&D subsidies and its effect on the final outcome if innovation policy.” The Druid Summer Conference 2004 od Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Devlopment. Elsinore Denmark, June 14 – 16. 2004. Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, István. 2018. “Some Thoughts on the Administration of the Regional Development in the Member States of the EU: In the Light of the Role of the Municipal Bodies.” Central European Public Administration 16(1), 7 – 29. Search in Google Scholar

Hud, Martin and Katrin Hussinger. 2015. “The Impact of R&D Subsidies during the Crisis.” Research Policy 44(10), 1844 – 1855. Search in Google Scholar

Khandker, Shahidur et al. 2009. Handbook on Impact Evaluation. London: Library Press.10.1596/978-0-8213-8028-4 Search in Google Scholar

Leibowicz, Benjamin D. 2018. “Welfare Improvement Windows for Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 47(2), 390 – 398. Search in Google Scholar

Lešková, Alexandra and Valéria Némethová. 2016. “Podpora vs. výsledky: Meranie dopadov regionálnej politiky Európskej únie.” Regionální rozvoj mezi teorií a praxí 4, 1 – 12. Search in Google Scholar

Mamede, Ricardo, et al. 2015. “Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of EU Funded Enterprise Support in Portugal.” WP 2015 / 05, Dinamia’cet. Available at https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/10729/1/DINAMIA_WP_2015-05.pdf (last accessed 27. October 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Mandl, Ulrike, Adriaan Dierx and Fabienne Ilzkovitz. 2008. “The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Public Spending.” Economic Paper 301. Brussels: European Communities. Search in Google Scholar

Marino, Marianna et al. 2016. “Additionality or Crowding-out ? An Overall Evaluation of Public R&D Subsidy on Private R&D Expenditure.” Research Policy 45(9), 1715 – 1730. Search in Google Scholar

Mihau, Diana, et al. 2010. “Efficiency, Effectiveness and Performance of the Public Sector.” Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 4(1), 132 – 147. Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic. 2014. Plán hodnotení Operačného programu Konkurencieschopnosť a hospodársky rast na programové obdobie 2007 – 2013. Ministerstvo hospodárstva SR. Available at https://www.economy.gov.sk/eu-a-fondy/eurofondy/po-2004-2006-a-2007-2013/operacny-program-konkurencieschopnost-a-hospodarsky-rast-zakladne-dokumenty/monitorovanie-a-hodnotenie/hodnotenie (last accessed 24 March 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Némethová, Valéria et al. 2019. “Public Support for Firms in Lagging Regions: Evaluation of Innovation Subsidy in Slovakia.” Science and Public Policy 46(2), 173 – 183. Search in Google Scholar

Nyikos, Györgyi and Zsuzsanna Kondor. 2019. “The Hungarian Experiences with Handling Irregularities in the Use of EU Funds.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 12(1), 113 – 134. Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2019. “Innovation Indicators.” Available at http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/innovation-indicators-2019.xlsx (last accessed 17. November 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Pisár, Peter et al. 2020. “The Contribution of Innovation Actors into Business R&D Funding: Does the Substitution Effect of Public Support Work in the EU ?” E a M: Ekonomie a Management 23(1), 121 – 134. Search in Google Scholar

Potluka, Oto and Milan Špaček. 2013. “Postupy a metody kontrafaktuálních dopadových evaluací pro Operační program Zaměstnanost v období 2014 – 2020.” Omega TA ČR TS010083. Available at https://www.mpsv.cz/documents/20142/848077/Metodika_CIE_MPSV_131015.pdf/cbe02b6d-4042-6801-14a5-1f40cd597a7d (last accessed 24. January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Radicic, Dragana et al. 2016. “The Impact of Innovation Support Programs on Small and Medium Enterprises Innovation in Traditional Manufacturing Industries: An Evaluation for Seven European Union Regions.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 34(8), 1425 – 1452. Search in Google Scholar

Reinkowski, Janina et al. 2011. “Do Public Subsidies Add to Private Sector R&D Activity ? Microeconomic Evidence for Regional Innovation Policy in East Germany.” GERFA. Available at http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa10/ERSA2010finalpaper1071.pdf (last accessed 10. March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Šipikal, Miroslav, Peter Pisár and Viera Labudová. 2013. “Are Subsidies Really Needed ? The Case of EU Regional Policy in the Czech and Slovak Republic.” E a M: Ekonomie a Management 16(4), 30 – 41. Search in Google Scholar

Šipikal, Miroslav and Valéria Szitásiová. 2020. Metódy hodnotenia programov a projektov. Bratislava: Ekonóm. Search in Google Scholar

Šipikal Miroslav et al. 2017. “Evaluation of Innovation Support from EU Funds in the Manufacturing of Wood and Wood Products in the Slovak Republic.” Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen 59(2), 167 – 180. Search in Google Scholar

Spielkamp, Alfred and Cyril Rammer. 2009. “Financing of Innovation: Thresholds and Options.” Management & Marketing 4(2), 3 – 18. Search in Google Scholar

White, Howard. 2009. “Theory Based Impact: Evaluation: Principles and Practice.” 3ie Working Papers 06(2009). Available at https://gwbweb.wustl.edu/Resources-and-Initiatives/Professional-Development/Documents/White-3ie-2009.pdf (last accessed 4. April 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Wing, Coady, Kosali Simon and Ricardo A. Bello-Gomez. 2018. “Designing Difference in Diferences Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.” Annual Review of Public Health 39, 453 – 469. Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo