1. bookVolume 12 (2019): Edizione 2 (December 2019)
Dettagli della rivista
Prima pubblicazione
03 Aug 2009
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
access type Accesso libero

Bounded Rationality of Individual Action in the Consumption of Public Goods

Pubblicato online: 11 Dec 2019
Volume & Edizione: Volume 12 (2019) - Edizione 2 (December 2019)
Pagine: 157 - 194
Dettagli della rivista
Prima pubblicazione
03 Aug 2009
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno

In order to gain a better understanding of human behaviour, Economics seeks to work with other disciplines such as Psychology, Sociology, or Anthropology (Behavioural Economics). Unlike neoclassical economic theory, behavioural economics does not assume a rational individual. On the contrary, it focuses on an irrational (bounded rational) individual while revealing what really influences his decision and his actions in order to respond more adequately to public needs, increasing the efficiency of public-service provision. The aim of the paper is to investigate the factors of willingness to pay for public services. The willingness of individuals to pay depends on factors such as affection and sympathy, conviction, compassion, regret, respect, warm glow, commitment to society, appreciation, invitation to participation, fundraising method and tax policy. The significance of the research conclusions lies in initiating a new perspective on the possibilities of securing public services.


JEL Classification

Aarts, Henk and Ap Dijksterhuis. 2003. “The Silence in Library: Environment, Situational Norm, and Social Behaviour.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 18 – 28.Search in Google Scholar

Alm, James and Sarah Jacobson. 2007. “Using Laboratory Experiments in Public Economics.” National Tax Journal 60(1), 129 – 152.Search in Google Scholar

Andreoni, James. 1995. “Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle: the Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperations in Experiments.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(1), 1 – 21.Search in Google Scholar

Andreoni, James and Andy Brownback. 2017. “All Pay Auctions and Group Size: Grading on a Curve and other Applications.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 137, 361 – 373.Search in Google Scholar

Andreoni, James, Abigail A. Payne, Justin Smith and David Karp. 2016. “Diversity and Donations: The Effect of Religious and Ethnic Diversity on Charitable Giving.” Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization 128, 47 – 58.Search in Google Scholar

Andreoni, James, Justin M. Rao and Hannah Trachtman. 2017. “Avoiding the Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving.” Journal of Political Economy 125(3), 625 – 653.Search in Google Scholar

Ariely, Dan. 2009. Jak drahé je zdarma ? Praha: Práh.Search in Google Scholar

Ariely, Dan and Jeff Kreisler. 2018. Psychológia peňazí: Akých omylov sa dopúšťame pri uvažovaní o peniazoch a ako útrácať rozumnejšie. Bratislava: Premedia.Search in Google Scholar

Baethge, Caroline, Martin Bækgaard, Jens Blom-Hansen, Patric Wolf et al. 2015. “Conducting Experiments in Public Management Research: A Practical Guide.” International Public Management Journal 18(2), 323 – 342.Search in Google Scholar

Behavioural Insights Team. 2015. EAST: Four Simple Ways to Apply Behavioural Insight. Cabinet Office. Available at https://www.bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/BIT-Publication-EAST_FA_WEB.pdf (last accessed 20 April 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bekkers, René and Pamala Wiepking. 2006. “To Give or not to Give, that is the Question: How Methodology is Destiny in Dutch Giving Data.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35(3), 533 – 540.10.1177/0899764006288286Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bekkers, René and Pamala Wiepking. 2010. “A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(5), 924 – 973.10.1177/0899764010380927Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Berlinski, Samuel and Matias Busso. 2016. “How Much are we Willing to Pay for Better Educational Outcomes ? Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” Economic Inquiry 54(1), 63 – 75.Search in Google Scholar

Bruni, Luigino, Vittorio Pelligra, Tommaso Reggiani and Matteo Rizzolli. 2019. “The Pied Piper: Prizes, Incentives, and Motivation Crowding-in.” Journal of Business Ethics 156, 1 – 16.Search in Google Scholar

Chakravarty, Surajeet and Miguel A. Fonseca. 2014. “The Effect of Social Fragmentation on Public Good Provision: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 54, 1 – 9.Search in Google Scholar

Cialdini, Robert B. 2016. Před-svědčovaní: Revoluční způsob, jak ovlivnit a přesvědčit. Brno: Jan Melvil Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Cox, James C., Vjollca Sadiraj and Ulrich Schmidt. 2015. “Paradoxes and Mechanisms for Choice under Risk.” Experimental Economics 18, 215 – 250.Search in Google Scholar

Cullis, John and Phillips Jones. 1998. Public Finance and Public Choice. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

DellaVigna, Stefano. 2009. “Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), 315 – 372.10.1257/jel.47.2.315Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Diamond, Peter A. and Hannu Vartiainen. 2007. Behavioral Economics and its Applications. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829149Search in Google Scholar

Dolan, Paul, Michael Hallsworth, David Halpern, Dominic King and Ivo Vlaev. 2009. MINDSPACE Influencing Behaviour through Public Policy. Institute for government. Discussion document – not a statement of government policy. Available at https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf (last accessed 20 April 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Duquette, Nicolas J. 2016. “Do Tax Incentives Affect Charitable Contributions ? Evidence from Public Charities’ Reported Revenues.” Journal of Public Economics 137, 51 – 69.Search in Google Scholar

Durantini, Marta R., Dolores Albarracín, Amy L. Mitchell, Allison N. Earl and Jeffrey C. Gillette. 2006. “Conceptualizing the Influence of Social Agents of Behavior Change: A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of HIV-Prevention Interventionists for Different Groups.” Psychological Bulletin 132, 212 – 248.10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.212Search in Google Scholar

Einolf, Christopher J. 2011. “Gender Differences in the Correlates of Volunteering and Charitable Giving.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40, 1092 – 1112.10.1177/0899764010385949Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Falk, Armin and Urs Fischbacher. 2006. “A Theory of Reciprocity.” Games and Economic Behavior 54(2), 293 – 315.10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fehr, Ernest. 2003. “Experimental and Behavioral Economics.” Lecture. Available at http://web.mit.edu/14.193/www/Fehr-MIT-Lecture1-2.pdf (last accessed 1 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, Ernst and Karla Hoff. 2011. “Introduction: Tastes, Castes and Culture: The Influence of Society on Preferences.” Economic Journal 121(556), 396 – 412.Search in Google Scholar

Frank, Robert H., Thomas Gilovich and Dennis T. Regan. 1993. “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperations ?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(2), 159 – 171.10.1257/jep.7.2.159Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Greitemeyer, Tobias. 2009. “Effects of Song with Prosocial Lyrics on Prosocial Behaviour: Further Evidence and a Mediating Mechanism.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35(11), 1500 – 1511.Search in Google Scholar

Guala, Francesco. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614651Search in Google Scholar

Halpern, David. 2016. Inside the Nudge Unit. London: Ebury.Search in Google Scholar

Hardisty, David J., Katherine F. Thompson, David H. Krantz and Elke U. Weber. 2013. “How to Measure Time Preferences: An Experimental Comparison of Th ree Methods.” Judgment and Decision Making 8(3), 236 – 249.Search in Google Scholar

Hardisty, David J. and Elke U. Weber. 2009. “Discounting Future Green: Money versus the Environment.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138, 329 – 340.Search in Google Scholar

Hewstone, Miles, Mark Rubin and Hazel Willis. 2002. “Intergroup Bias.” Annual Review of Psychology 53, 575 – 604.Search in Google Scholar

James, Oliver, Sebastian R. Jilke and Gregg G. Van Ryzyn. 2017. Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316676912Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel A. and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47(2), 263 – 291.10.2307/1914185Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Keizer, Kees, Siegwart Lindenberg and Linda Steg. 2008. “The Spreading of Disorder.” Science 322(5908), 1681 – 1685.Search in Google Scholar

Ledyard, J. O. 1995. “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research.” In John H. Kagel and Alvin E. Roth (eds). Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 195 – 252.Search in Google Scholar

Levav, Jonathan and A. Peter McGraw. 2009. “Emotional Accounting: How Feelings about Money Influence Consumer Choice.” Journal of Marketing Research 46(1), 66 – 80.10.1509/jmkr.46.1.66Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lussier, Jennifer P., Sarah H. Heil, Joan A. Mongeon, Gary J. Badger and Stephen T. Higgins. 2006. “A Meta-Analysis of Voucher-Based Reinforcement Therapy for Substance Use Disorders.” Addiction 101(2), 192 – 203.Search in Google Scholar

Luttmer, Erzo F. P. 2001. “Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution.” Journal of Political Economy 109, 500 – 528.Search in Google Scholar

Makýšová, Lucia and Gabriela Vaceková. 2017. “Profitable Nonprofits ? Reward-Based Crowdfunding in the Czech Republic.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 10(2), 203 – 227.Search in Google Scholar

Mandel, Naomi and Eric J. Johnson. 2002. “When Web Pages Influence Choice: Effects of Visual Primes on Experts and Novices.” Journal of Consumer Research 29, 235 – 245.10.1086/341573Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Markechová, Dagmar, Beáta Stehlíková and Anna Tirpáková. 2011. Štatistické metódy a ich aplikácie. Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína filozofa v Nitre.Search in Google Scholar

Mikušová Meričková, Beáta and Jan Stejskal. 2014. “Hodnota statku kolektívnej spotreby.” Politická ekonómia 62(2), 216 – 231.Search in Google Scholar

Mindworx. 2019. “Ako sme malou zmenou zvýšili efektivitu SMS kampane o 55 %.” Available at https://mindworx.net/sk/ako-sme-malou-zmenou-zvysili-efektivitu-sms-kampane-o-55. (last accessed 20 April 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Mullainathan, Sendhil and Richard H. Thaler. 2000. “Behavioral Economics.” National Bureau of economic research working paper 7948.10.3386/w7948Search in Google Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691144511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nosenzo, Daniele, Simone Quercia and Martin Sefton. 2015. “Cooperation in Small Groups: The Effect of Group Size.” Experimental Economics 18, 4 – 14.Search in Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 2002. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Revised edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, Lee. 1977. “The Intuitive Psychologist and his Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10, 173 – 220.Search in Google Scholar

Rothbard, Murray. 2001. Ekonomie státnich zásahů. Praha: Liberální institut.Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 36(4), 387 – 389.10.2307/1925895Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul. 1955. “A Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 37, 350 – 356.Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, Michael and Sarah Smith. 2015. “A Warm Glow in the Afterlife: Can Simple Prompts Increase Request Giving ?” Available at http://ernop.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Sarah-Smith.pdf (last accessed 19 June 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Shayo, Moses. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103(2), 147 – 174.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. 1982. “Microeconomics Systems as an Experimental Science.” American Economic Review 72(5), 923 – 955.Search in Google Scholar

Soukopová, Jana, Juraj Nemec, Lenka Maťejová and Michal Struk. 2014. “Municipality Size and Local Public Services: Do Economies of Scale Exist ?” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7(2), 151 – 171.Search in Google Scholar

Špalek, Jiří. 2011. Veřejné statky: Teorie a experiment. Praha: H. C. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Špalek, Jiří and Jan Řikovský. 2019. “Determinants of Decision-Making on the Mitigation of Global Environmental Issues in the Context of Subjective Rationality.” Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 28(1), 298 – 305.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, Richard and Cass R. Sunstein. 2010. Nudge (Šťouch): Jak postrčit lidi k lepšímu rozhodování o zdraví, majetku a štěstí. Zlín: Kniha Zlín.Search in Google Scholar

Webb, Thomas L. and Paschal Sheeran. 2006. “Does Changing Behavioral Intentions Engender Behavior Change ? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence.” Psychological Bulletin 13, 249 – 268.10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo