1. bookVolume 22 (2016): Edizione 2 (June 2016)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2450-5781
Prima pubblicazione
30 Mar 2017
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Optimizing Outcome in the University-Industry Technology Transfer Projects

Pubblicato online: 15 Mar 2018
Volume & Edizione: Volume 22 (2016) - Edizione 2 (June 2016)
Pagine: 94 - 100
Ricevuto: 01 Feb 2016
Accettato: 01 Apr 2016
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2450-5781
Prima pubblicazione
30 Mar 2017
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

[1] Agrawal. „University-to-Industry Knowledge Transfer: Literature Review and Unanswered Questions”, in International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 3 (4), December 2001, pp. 285-302.10.1111/1468-2370.00069Search in Google Scholar

[2] Agrawal. „Engaging the Inventor: Exploring Licensing Strategies for University Inventions and the Role of Latent Knowledge”, in Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27(1), January 2006, pp. 63-79.10.1002/smj.508Search in Google Scholar

[3] N.S. Argyres and J.P. Liebeskind. „Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology”, in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 35(4), May 1998, pp. 427-454.10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00049-3Search in Google Scholar

[4] Arora. „Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and the Market for Know-How”, in Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 4(1), 1995, pp. 41-60.10.1080/10438599500000013Search in Google Scholar

[5] R.L. Beck. „Competition for Patent Monopolies”, in Research in Law and Economics, vol. 3, 1981, pp. 91-100.Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Bessen. „Patents and the Diffusion of Technical Information”, in Economics Letters, vol. 86(1), January 2005, pp. 121-128.10.1016/j.econlet.2004.07.005Search in Google Scholar

[7] D. Blumenthal. „Academic-Industrial Relationships in the Life Sciences”, in New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349(25), December 2003, pp. 2452-2459.10.1056/NEJMhpr035460Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Blumenthal et al., „Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry”, in New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335(23), December 1996, pp. 1734-1738.10.1056/NEJM199612053352305Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bozeman. „Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory”, in Research Policy, vol. 29(4-5), April 2000, pp. 627-655.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1Search in Google Scholar

[10] D.L. Burk and B.H. McDonnell. „The Goldilocks Hypothesis: Balancing Intellectual Property Rights at the Boundary of the Firm”, in University of Illinois Law Review, vol. 2007(2), 2007, pp. 575-636.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Burstein and D. Bok. Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education, Princeton University Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[12] CFMT, Inc. v. YieldUP Int'l Corp., 349 F.3d 1333, 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2003)Search in Google Scholar

[13] W.M. Cohen and D.A. Levinthal. „Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, in Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35(1), March 1990, pp. 128-152.10.2307/2393553Search in Google Scholar

[14] H.M. Collins. „The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks”, in Science Studies, vol. 4(2), April 1974, pp. 165-185.10.1177/030631277400400203Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ch.A. Cotropia. „The Folly of Early Filing in Patent Law”, in Hastings Law Journal, vol. 61(1), November 2009, pp. 72-82.Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. Cowan and D. Foray. „The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge”, in Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 6(3), February 1997, pp. 595-622.10.1093/icc/6.3.595Search in Google Scholar

[17] Di Gregorio and S. Scott. „Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-Ups Than Others?” in Research Policy, vol. 32(2), February 2003, pp. 209-227.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5Search in Google Scholar

[18] R.S. Eisenberg. „Academic Freedom and Academic Values in Sponsored Research”, in Texas Law Review, vol. 66, March 1988, pp. 1363-1404.Search in Google Scholar

[19] R.S. Eisenberg. „Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use”, in University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 56, 1989, pp. 1017-1086.10.2307/1599761Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Feldman et al., „Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities”, in Management Science, vol. 48(1), January 2002, pp. 105-121.10.1287/mnsc.48.1.105.14276Search in Google Scholar

[21] B.M. Frischmann. „Commercializing University Research Systems in Economic Perspective: A View from the Demand Side”, in University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Process, Design, and Intellectual Property, G.D. Libecap, Stamford (CT): JAI Press, pp. 155-186.10.1016/S1048-4736(05)16006-8Search in Google Scholar

[22] J.C. Fromer. „Patent Disclosure”, in Iowa Law Review, vol. 94(2), February 2009, pp. 539-606.Search in Google Scholar

[23] R.J. Gilson et al., „Contracting for Innovation: Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration”, in Columbia Law Review, vol. 109(3), April 2009, pp. 431-502.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Gorga and M. Halberstam. „Knowledge Inputs, Legal Institutions, and Firm Structure: Towards a Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm”, in Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 101(3), April 2007, pp. 1123-1144.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hippel. „Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation”, in ManagementScience, vol. 40(4), April 1994, pp. 429-439.10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429Search in Google Scholar

[26] T.R. Holbrook. „Possession in Patent Law”, in Southern Methodist University Law Review, vol. 59(1), January 2006, pp. 126-131.Search in Google Scholar

[27] J. Howells. „Tacit Knowledge. Innovation and Technology Transfer”, in Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 8(2), June 1996, pp. 91-106.10.1080/09537329608524237Search in Google Scholar

[28] H. Irwin and E. More. „Technology Transfer and Communication: Lessons from Silicon Valley, Route 128, Carolina's Research Triangle and Hi-Tech Texas”, in Journal of Information Science, vol. 17(5), October 1991, pp. 273-280.10.1177/016555159101700503Search in Google Scholar

[29] C. Jansen and H.F. Dillon. „Where Do the Leads for Licenses Come From? Source Data from Six Institutions”, in Industry and Higher Education, vol. 14(3), June 2000, pp. 150-156.10.5367/000000000101294995Search in Google Scholar

[30] R. Jensen and M. Thursby. „Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions”, in American Economic Review, vol. 91(1), March 2001, pp. 240-259.10.1257/aer.91.1.240Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. Kenney. Biotechnology: The University Industrial Complex, New Haven(CT): Yale University Press, 1986.10.2307/j.ctt1ww3vs6Search in Google Scholar

[32] E.W. Kitch. „The Nature and Function of the Patent System”, in Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 20(2), October 1977, pp. 265-290.10.1086/466903Search in Google Scholar

[33] B. Kogut and U. Zander. „Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology”, in Organization Science, vol. 3(3), August 1992, 383-397.10.1287/orsc.3.3.383Search in Google Scholar

[34] Krattiger et al. Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices, MIHR and PIPRA, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[35] L.R. de Larena. „The Price of Progress: Are Universities Adding to the Cost?”, in Houston Law Review, vol. 44, July 2006, pp. 1373-1375.Search in Google Scholar

[36] P. Lee. „Contracting to Preserve Open Science: Consideration- Based Regulation in Patent Law”, in Emory Law Journal, vol. 58(4), October 2009, pp. 889-976.Search in Google Scholar

[37] P. Lee. „Transcending the tacit dimension: Patents, relationships, and organizational integration in technology transfer”, in California Law Review, vol. 100(6), December 2012, pp. 1503-1572.Search in Google Scholar

[38] R.L. Lieberwitz. „The Marketing of Higher Education: The Price of the University's Soul”, in Cornell Law Review, vol. 89, March 2004, pp. 763-800.Search in Google Scholar

[39] K. Lim. „The Many Faces of Absorptive Capacity: Spillovers of Copper Interconnect Technology for Semiconductor Chips”, in Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 18(6), December 2009, pp. 1249-1284.10.1093/icc/dtp044Search in Google Scholar

[40] Lockett et al., „Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies”, in Small Business Economics, vol. 20(2), March 2003, pp. 185-200.10.1023/A:1022220216972Search in Google Scholar

[41] G.D. Markman et al., „Entrepreneurship and University- Based Technology Transfer”, in Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 20(2), March 2005, pp. 241-263.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[42] Marshall. Principles of Economics, 8th ed., London: Macmillan and Co., 1920.Search in Google Scholar

[43] R.P. Merges. „Of Property Rules, Coase, and Intellectual Property”, in Columbia Law Review, vol. 94(8), December 1994, pp. 2655-2673.10.2307/1123152Search in Google Scholar

[44] D.C. Moweryt et al., Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act, Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Murray. „Innovation as Co-evolution of Scientific and Technological Networks: Exploring Tissue Engineering”, in Research Policy, vol. 39(8-9), December 2002, 1389-1403.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00070-7Search in Google Scholar

[46] J.E. Oxley. „Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach”, in Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol. 13 (2), 1997, pp. 387-409.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023389Search in Google Scholar

[47] W.W. Powell. „Inter-organizational Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry”, in Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 152(1), March 1996, pp. 197-215.Search in Google Scholar

[48] J.B. Powers and P.P. McDougall. „University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms That Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship”, in Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 20 (3), May 2005, pp. 291-311.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008Search in Google Scholar

[49] E. Press and J. Washburn. „The Kept University”, in Atlantic Monthly, vol. 285(3), March 2000, pp. 39-54. Search in Google Scholar

[50] S.B. Seymore. „The Teaching Function of Patents”, in Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 85(2), 2010, pp. 621-669.Search in Google Scholar

[51] T. Sichelman. „Commercializing Patents”, in Stanford Law Review, vol. 62(2), January 2010, pp. 341-413.Search in Google Scholar

[52] D.S. Siegel et al., „Toward a Model of the Effective Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies”, in Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 21(1- 2), March-June 2004, pp. 115-142.10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[53] H.T. Stelfox et al., „Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel Antagonists”, in New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 338(2), January 1998, pp. 101-106.10.1056/NEJM1998010833802069420342Search in Google Scholar

[54] P.M. Swamidass and V. Vulasa. „Why University Inventions Rarely Produce Income? Bottlenecks in University Technology Transfer”, in The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 34(4), August 2009, pp. 343-363.10.1007/s10961-008-9097-8Search in Google Scholar

[55] L.G. Zucker and M.R. Darby. „Star Scientists and Institutional Transformation: Patterns of Invention and Innovation in the Formation of the Biotechnology Industry”, Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 93(23), November 1996, pp. 12709-12716.10.1073/pnas.93.23.12709341268917483Search in Google Scholar

[56] L.G. Zucker et al., „Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises”, in The American Economic Review, vol. 88(1), March 1998, pp. 290-306.Search in Google Scholar

[57] L.G. Zucker et al., „Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Finn Performance in Biotechnology”, in Management Science, vol. 48(1), January 2002, pp. 138-153.10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274Search in Google Scholar

[58] D.J. Teece. „Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How”, in The Economic Journal, vol. 87(346), June 1977, pp. 242-261.10.2307/2232084Search in Google Scholar

[59] J.G. Thursby and M.C. Thursby. „Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University-Industry Licensing”, in Contemporary Economic Policy, vol. 22(2), April 2004, pp.162-178.10.1093/cep/byh012Search in Google Scholar

[60] D.J. Triggle. „Patenting the Sun: Enclosing the Scientific Commons and Transforming the University - Ethical Concerns”, in Drug Development Research, vol. 63 (3), November 2004, pp. 139-149.10.1002/ddr.10404Search in Google Scholar

[61] J. Washburn. „Big Oil Buys Berkeley: The BP-UC Berkeley Research Deal Pushes Academic Integrity Aside for Profit”, in Los Angeles Times, 24 March 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo