The Market Functioning of Polish Higher Education Institutions in the Context of the Implementation of the Concept of Social Responsibility

1. Alzyoud, S.A., & Bani-Hani, K. (2015). Social responsibility in higher education institutions: Application case from the Middle East. European Scientific Journal, 11(8), 122–129. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/5259.Search in Google Scholar

2. Babbie, E.R. (1990). Survey research methods. Wadsworth Publishing Company: Belmonton.Search in Google Scholar

3. Buchat, K., Jakubiak, M., Skiert, M., & Wilczewski, A. (2018). University’s social responsibility — labour market perspective. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 18(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2018-0018.10.2478/foli-2018-0018Search in Google Scholar

4. Carroll, A. B. (1976). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850.10.2307/257850Search in Google Scholar

5. Commission of the European Communities. (2001, July 19). Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, p. 19. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/DOC_01_9 (accessed on 16th August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

6. Cornelius, N., Wallace, J., & Tassabehji, R. (2007). An analysis of corporate social responsibility, corporate identity and ethics teaching in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9271-6.10.1007/s10551-006-9271-6Search in Google Scholar

7. Crowther, D., & Aras, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility. Ventus Publishing ApS: Denmark. https://archive.org/details/CorporateSocialResponsibility/page/n1. (accessed 5th September 2019).Search in Google Scholar

8. CSR — Finance Institute. (n.d.). H-CSR-M: Hopkins CSR/Sustainability Model: Rapid CSR/Sustainability reporting with H-CSR-M. https://www.csrfi.com/hopkinscsrmodel. (accessed on 5th September 2019).Search in Google Scholar

9. Cygler, J., Sroka, W., Solesvik, M., & Dębkowska, K. (2018). Benefits and drawbacks of coopetition: The role of scope and durability in coopetitive relationships. Sustainability, 10(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082688.10.3390/su10082688Search in Google Scholar

10. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132.10.1002/csr.132Search in Google Scholar

11. Fundacja Rektorów Polskich. (2007). Kodeks “Dobre praktyki w szkołach wyższych.”. Konferencja Rektorów Akademickich Szkół Polskich & Fundacja Rektorów Polskich: Kraków, Poland, 1–16. https://arch.krasp.org.pl/pl/kdp/kodeks_dobre_praktyki. (accessed on 16th August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

12. Giuffre, L., & Ratto, S.E. (2014, March). A new paradigm in higher education: University social responsibility (USR). Journal of Education & Human Development 3(1), 231–238. http://jehdnet.com/vol-3-no-1-march-2014-abstract-15-jehd.Search in Google Scholar

13. Gourova, E., Todorova, Y., & Gourov, N. (2009). Skills for future engineers: Challenges for universities in Bulgaria. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 6, 385–399. https://www.academia.edu/25220889/Skills_for_future_engineers_challenges_for_universities_in_Bulgaria.Search in Google Scholar

14. Hamidu, A.A., Haron, H.M., & Amran, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: A review on definitions, core characteristics and theoretical perspectives. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 6, 83–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83.10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83Search in Google Scholar

15. Ibom, A., & Akpan, U. (2014). The survey communication research. International Journal of Education and Research 2(10), 461–478. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2014/October-2014/36.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

16. KRASP. (2019). Deklaracja Społecznej Odpowiedzialności Uczelni. https://www.krasp.org.pl/resources/upload/dokumenty/prezentacje/UWMOlsztyn/P7-11dok15_Spoleczna_Odpowiedzialnosc_Uczelni.pdf (accessed on 11th August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

17. Konferencja Rektorów Akademickich Szkół Polskich /KRASP/ (2019). https://www.krasp.org.pl/pl/Aktualnosci/?id=20530/KRASP_wsrod_sygnatariuszy_deklaracji_ (accessed on 16th August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

18. Pabian, A. (2016). Od konwergencji sektorów poprzez konkurencję wśród polskich uczelni publicznych i niepublicznych po rozwiązania hybrydowe. Marketing i Rynek, 4, 2–10.Search in Google Scholar

19. Pabian A. (2016). Rynkowa orientacja szkół wyższych w Polsce — uwarunkowania, wyznaczniki, prawidłowości. Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Biznesu w Dąbrowie Górniczej: Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland; 93–163.Search in Google Scholar

20. Pabian, A.M. (2019). University social responsibility in the opinion of students. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(4), 101–117. DOI: 10.23762/FSO_VOL7_NO4_7.Search in Google Scholar

21. Pędziwiatr, E., Czaplicka-Kotas, A., & Kulczycka, J. (2018). Działania realizowane przez szkoły wyższe w ramach społecznej odpowiedzialności — dobre praktyki. Ekonomika Społeczna, 1, 45–56. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.15678%2FES.2018.1.04.10.15678/ES.2018.1.04Search in Google Scholar

22. Sawasdikosol, S. /P. Moral/ (2009). Driving universities’ collaboration toward the new era of sustainable social responsibility. Presented at the University-Community Engagement Conference, 23–26 November 2009, Penang, Malaysia. http://www.globalusrnetwork.org/resources/Driving_Universities.pdf (accessed on 3rd September 2019).Search in Google Scholar

23. Statistics Poland, Statistical O?ce in Gdańsk. (2018). Higher education institutions and their finances in 2017; Statistics Poland, Statistical O?ce in Gdańsk: Warszawa, Gdańsk, Poland, 299–320.Search in Google Scholar

24. Tetřevová, L., & Sabolová, V. (2010). University Stakeholder Management and University Social Responsibility. WSEAS transactions on advances in engineering education, 7(7), 224–233. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/education/2010/88-330.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

25. European University Association. (2007, April 13). The Lisbon Declaration. Europe’s Universities beyond 2010: Diversity with a Common Purpose. https://bmbwf.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Bologna_Grundsatzdok/Von_Bergen_bis_London/EUA_Lisbon_declaration_Mai_07.pdf (accessed on 15th August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

26. Tien, H.T. (2014). What is the difference between CSR1, CSR2, CSR3 and CSR4? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261133486_What_is_the_difference_between_CSR1_CSR2_CSR3_and_CSR4 (accessed on 5th September 2019).Search in Google Scholar

27. Universities for Enlightenment. (2018, December 13). http://www.rkrs.si/gradiva/Dokumenti_RKRS/Priloga_k_sklepu_S22_joint_statement_ORIGINAL.PDF (accessed on 16th August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

28. Vallaeys, F. (2018). Defining social responsibility: A matter of philosophical urgency for universities. The Global University Network for Innovation. http://www.guninetwork.org/articles/defining-social-responsibility-matter-philosophical-urgency-universities (accessed on 14th August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

29. Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., & Baicu, C. (2010). Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4177–4182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660Search in Google Scholar

30. European Commission. (2017, March 1). White paper on the future of Europe: Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025, p. 10. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf (accessed on 16th August 2019).Search in Google Scholar