| Land attractiveness and suitability for tourism and investment projects (benefit) |
| Tourism attractions (1) |
Environmental: crocus scepusiensis – frequent and widespread appearance |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0.2 |
| Scenic values: visibility of the Tatra peaks |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
0.4 |
| Scenic values – contrasting land cover: zone of 150m between forest and lower land cover |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1 |
0.2 |
| Cultural: occurrence of traditional architecture |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
1 |
| Land cover/use suitability (2) |
Forest |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0.2 |
| Meadows and pastures |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
0.2 |
| Arable lands |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1 |
0 |
0.2 |
| Built-up areas and tourism services |
0.6 |
0.6 |
EXCL |
1 |
1 |
| Proximity of roads 6–20 m |
0.8 |
0.8 |
EXCL |
1 |
1 |
| Proximity of roads up to 6 m |
0.6 |
0.6 |
EXCL |
0 |
0.8 |
| Flat areas (6) |
Flat areas and slight terrain slope (< 2.9°) |
1 |
1 |
EXCL |
1 |
1 |
| Limitations on the development of tourism and investment (cost) |
| 3. Nature and landscape protection (3) |
Natura 2000 – ecological corridor protection |
0.2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| Preservation of traditional land uses: meadows and pastures, forests outside the Natura 2000 area, arable lands |
0 |
0 |
0.4 |
0 |
0.8 |
| 4. Scenic value (4) |
Areas with landform and traditional use, creating scenic value |
areas visible from 10–32 observer points |
0 |
0 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
| 32+ observer points |
0 |
0 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
| 5. Erosion and flooding risk (5) |
Faint (2.9 – 9°) and moderate (>9°) slope |
0.2 |
0.6 |
NE |
0.6 |
0.8 |
| Main rivers valley floors |
0.2 |
0.2 |
EXCL |
0.4 |
1 |
| Stream valleys with a surrounding of 15 m |
0.4 |
0.8 |
EXCL |
1 |
1 |
e 
