[
Aquinas, T., 2005. Commentaries on Aristotle’s “On Sense and What Is Sensed” and “On Memory and Recollection. CUA Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aristotelis, 1596. Libelli Aristotelis de Sensu et Sensilibus Castigata versio et Analysis Logica. Francofurti: apud M. Zachariam Palthenium.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aristotelis, 1848. Opera omnia; graece et latine, cum indice nominum et rerum absolutissimo. P.: Didot.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austin, J. L., 1962a. How to Do Things with Words. In Urmson, J. O. (Ed.), The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austin, J. L., 1962b. Sense and sensibilia. Reconstructed from the manuscript notes by GJ Warnock. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bezemer, J., Jewitt, C., 2018. Multimodality: A guide for linguists. Research methods in linguistics, 28, 1–3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Binkelmann, C., 2019. Wechselwirkung im Spieltrieb. Schillers Konfliktuöser Bezug auf Fichte. (Briefe 14 bis 16). In Stiening, G. (Ed.), Friedrich Schiller: über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen in einer Reihe von Briefen. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, D., 2007. Is Descartes’ body a mode of mind? In Forming the Mind: Essays on the Internal Senses and the Mind/Body Problem from Avicenna to the Medical Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 263–281.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, D., 2014. The Sixth Meditation: Descartes and the embodied self. In Cunning, D. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Descartes’ Meditations. Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, D., 2016. Objective being in Descartes: that which we know or that by which we know? In Representation and objects of thought in medieval philosophy. Routledge, pp. 135–153.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buyssens, E., 1942. De l’abstrait et du concret dans les faits linguistiques: La parole—le discours—la langue. Acta linguistica, 3(1), 17–23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cartesius, 1641. Renati Des-Cartes Meditationes de prima philosophia, in qua Dei existentia et animae immortalitas demonstrantur. Parisiis apud Michaelem Soli.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cecchi, D., 2010. Heidegger on Schiller, Arendt on Kant. In Schreiben Dichten Denken. Klostermann, pp. 113–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chamberlain, C., 2020. What Am I? Descartes’s Various Ways of Considering the Self. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 2(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2009. Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & cognition, 17(3), 495–508.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J. (Ed.), 2011. Distributed Language. John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 1–230.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2021. Ecolinguistics reunited: Rewilding the territory. Journal of World Languages, 7(3), 405–427.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., Gahrn-Andersen, R., 2022. Simplexifying: harnessing the power of enlanguaged cognition. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 18(1), 97–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davidson, T. M., 2003. The Great Leap Forward: the anatomic basis for the acquisition of speech and obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep medicine, 4(3), 185–194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deligiorgi, K., 2020. Kant, Schiller, and the idea of a moral self. Kant-Studien, 111(2), 303–322.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diamond, J., 1989. Dawn of the Human Race: The Great Leap Forward. Discover, 10(5), 50–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Everett, D., 2017. How language began: The story of humanity’s greatest invention. Profile Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Everett, D. L., 2018. The role of culture in language and cognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(11), e12304.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halliday, M. A. K., 1978. Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. L.: Edward Allen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hjelmslev, L., 1969. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language: Transl. by Francis J. Whitfield. University of Wisconsin Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hjelmslev, L., 1993. Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlæggels. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague. Vol. XXV. Copenhagen: Reitzel.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hodge, B., Kress, G., 1988. Social semiotics. Ithaca (N.Y.): Cornell University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hodge, B., 2016. Social semiotics for a complex world: Analysing language and social meaning. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmeyer, J., 1998. Surfaces inside surfaces. On the origin of agency and life. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 5(1), 33–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huizinga, J., 1949. Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huizinga, J., 1940. Homo ludens. Proeve fleener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur. Haarlem: H. D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ilyin, M., 2020. Emergence and advancement of basic human capacities. Linguistic Frontiers, 3(2), 3–20, available at: < DOI: 10.2478/lf-2020-0010 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ilyin, M.V., 2022. People shaped themselves from animals by recursion, reference and linguistics. METHOD: Moscow Quarterly of Works from Social Science Disciplines. – M.: INION RAN, 2(2), 41–81, available at: < http://www.doi.org/10.31249/metodquarterly/02.02.05 >. (In Russian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kant, I., 1770. De Mundi Sensibilis atque Intelligibilis Forma et Principiis. Regiomonti: Impensis Io. Iac. Kanteri.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klein, R. G., 1995. Anatomy, behavior, and modern human origins. Journal of World Prehistory, 9(2), 167–198.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klein, R. G., 1999. The human career: human biological and cultural origins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Korisettar, R., 1998. Early Human Behaviour in Global Context. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kress, G., 2009. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehmann, W., 1986. A gothic etymological dictionary. Based on the third edition of Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der Gotischen Sprache by Sigmund Feist. Leiden: Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindly, J. M., Clark, G. A., Bar-Yosef, O. et al., 1990. Symbolism and Modern Human Origins [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology, 31(3), 233–261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Losev, A. F., 1982a. On the propositional functions of the oldest lexical structures. In Sign. Symbol. Myth. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, pp. 246–279. (In Russian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Losev, A. F., 1982b. On the types of grammatical sentences in connection with the history of thinking. In Sign. Symbol. Myth. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, pp. 280–407. (In Russian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehigan, T., 2020. Schiller after Kant: The “Unexpected Science” of the Briefe über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen. Kant-Studien, 111(2), 285–302.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mellars, P., Stringer (Eds.), 1989. The human revolution: Behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans, vol. I. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orel, V. E., 2003. “*þenʒaz ~ *þenxaz”. A handbook of Germanic etymology. Leiden: Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roebroeks, W., Conard, N. J., Van Kolfschoten, T. et al., 1992. Dense forests, cold steppes, and the palaeolithic settlement of Northern Europe [and comments and replies]. Current anthropology, 33(5), 551–586.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rozov, N. S., 2021. Origin of language: coevolution of communicative concerns and sign structures. METHOD: Moscow Yearbook of Works from Social Science Disciplines, 11, 162–193.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rozov, N. S., 2022. Origin of language and consciousness. How social orders and communicative concerns gave rise to speech and cognitive abilities. Novosibirsk: Manuscript. (In Russian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rozov, N. S., 2023. The Origin of Language and Consciousness: How Social Orders and Communicative Concerns Gave Rise to Speech and Cognitive Abilities. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Russell, B., 1918. Mysticism and Logic and other essays. Longmans, Green and Co., London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saussure, F., 1959. Course in general linguistics. N.Y.: Philosophical library.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schiller, F., 1795. Über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen in einer Reihe von Briefen. Die Horen, 1(1), 7–48, 2, 51–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sériot, P. (1986). Langue russe et discours politique soviétique: analyse des nominalisations. Langages, (81), 11-41
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sherratt, A., 1997. Climatic cycles and behavioural revolutions: the emergence of modern humans and the beginning of farming. Antiquity, 71(272), 271–287.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steffensen, S., Cowley, S. J., 2021. Thinking on behalf of the world: Radical embodied ecolinguistics. In Wen, X., Taylor, J. R. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 723–736.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sterelny, K., 2011. From hominins to humans: how sapiens became behaviourally modern. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1566), 809–822.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thibault, P.J., 2022a. Distributed languaging, affective dynamics, and the human ecology Volume I: The sense-making body. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thibault, P.J., 2022b. Distributed Languaging, Affective Dynamics, and the Human Ecology Volume II: Co-articulating Self and World. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waibel, V. L., 2020. Feelings, morality, human beings seen holistically: a dialogue between Kant and Schiller. Feelings, morality, human beings seen holistically: a dialogue between Kant and Schiller, 87–99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wittgenstein, L., 2009. Philosophical investigations. Anscombe, G.E.M., Hacker, P.M.S., Schulte, J. (Trans.). — Rev. 4th ed. Oxf.: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zolyan, S., 2019. General sociolinguistics, social semiotics and semiotics of culture–ex pluribus unum? Forty years after Language as Social Semiotic. Σημειωτκή – Sign Systems Studies, 47(3–4), 400–419.
]Search in Google Scholar
